Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1116 GAIL STOCKTON, individually and as Special Administrator of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL MADDEN, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

08/10/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 21, 2018 Session IN RE THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARY RUTH DAVIS HUDSON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 189670-3 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor No. E2017-00810-COA-R3-CV In thi

181 S.E.2d 443 (1971) 279 N.C. 156 TOWN OF HUDSON v. CITY OF LENOIR. ATLANTIC INVESTMENT COMPANY, Inc. et al. v. TOWN OF HUDSON, a Municipal Corporation and City of Lenoir, a Municipal Corporation. No. 104. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 10, 1971. *445 West & Groome, by H. Houston Gr

Cite as 2025 Ark. 48 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-558 Opinion Delivered: April 24, 2025 MICHAEL W. GATES AND SUSAN J. GATES APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26CV-21-100] V. HONORABLE GARY M. ARNOLD,

210 F.Supp.2d 545 (2002) Abel GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. The RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY, The Board of Trustees of the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, The State of New Jersey, and President Vera King Farris, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-4467. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 11, 2002. *546

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

402 S.E.2d 196 (1991) Dennis Waldon STOCKTON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 901320. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 1, 1991. *198 Karen I. Meyer, Barry L. Johnson (William E. Cook, Jr., Carolyn M. Landever, Kevin L. Anderson, Kathy Gear Owens, Arnold & Porter, on briefs), for appellant. Virginia B. Theisen, A

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

ORDER GRANTING IN PART CITY AND COUNTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants City of Grandview, Michael Akins, Kal Fuller, John Arraj, Rick Abarca, Mitch Fairchild, Kevin Glasenapp, Travis Shepard, Seth Bailey, Robert Tucker, and Therese Murphy (“City and County Defendants”), ECF No. 79. The Co

301 S.E.2d 129 (1983) John T. McKENZIE, Jr., et al. v. CITY OF HIGH POINT. No. 8218SC407. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 5, 1983. *130 Herbert L. Hyde, Asheville, for petitioners-appellants. Knox Walker, High Point, for respondent-appellee. WELLS, Judge. Part Three of chapter 160A of the General St

268 S.E.2d 190 (1980) 300 N.C. 651 CITY OF THOMASVILLE v. LEASE-AFEX, INC. No. 107. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 15, 1980. *193 Richard M. Pearman, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant. Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson by W. Thompson Comerford, Jr., Winston-Salem, for d

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge. Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages to a bulldozer owned by it, those damages having been allegedly caused by the defective design, installation and operation of a fire suppressant system placed by defendant on plaintiff’s bulldozer. The claims for damages were pled under theories of breach of express and implied warranties and negligence. After substantial discovery, defendant moved for and got sum

417 S.E.2d 305 (1992) William Ivory FAISON, et al. v. Gail M. HUDSON, Administrator of the Estate of Ulus Grant Hudson, Jr., Deceased. Record No. 910968. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 17, 1992. *306 Trent S. Kerns, Richmond (Bradford T. Johnson, Kerns & Kastenbaum, on briefs), for appellants. Larry A. Pochucha, Rich

84 S.W.3d 439 (2002) 350 Ark. 12 CITY OF CORNING, Arkansas v. Bob COCHRAN, Tina Woods, Harry W. Hudson. No. 02-139. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 12, 2002. *440 Branch, Thompson, Philhours, Warmath & Hitt, by: Robert F. Thompson III, Paragould, for Appellant. Richard Whiffen, P.C., Sikest

209 S.E.2d 743 (1974) 286 N.C. 80 Leon KAPLAN and wife, Renee M. Kaplan, trading as Tiny Town v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM. No. 27. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 26, 1974. *745 Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson by Norwood Robinson and George L. Little, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaint

Opinion BORDEN, J. The named plaintiff, the city of Waterbury (Waterbury), appeals1 and the named defendant, the town of Washington (Washington),2 cross *510appeals3 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a court trial, granting a permanent inj

BROCK, Chief Judge. Defendant contends that plaintiffs’ cause of action, not being on behalf of a member of the travelling public, is barred by the doctrine of governmental immunity. It is generally held that the duty of keeping sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition rests primarily on a municipality. A municipality may not undertake a task of street improvement or repair in a careless or negligent fashi

VAUGHN, Judge. We find no merit in plaintiff’s argument that the court erred when it refused to grant his oral motion to continue so that other discovery might be completed. The motion, made on the very day of the hearing, came over three years after the fire, twelve months after the suit was started and nearly two months after defendant had moved for summary judgment. The motion was properly denied. Moreover, it should be not

371 F.3d 1137 RUI ONE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF BERKELEY, Defendant-Appellee,Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union Local 2850, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 02-15762. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 11, 2003. Filed June 16, 2004.

893 F.Supp. 589 (1995) Robert BURKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 2:93-3001-22. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. June 23, 1995. *590 *591 Gregory S. Forman, William J. Hamilton, III, Charleston, SC, for plaintiff. John Ham