Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hubbard v. Sheffield”
United States v. Hubbardpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge. A magistrate judge ordered that defendant William Hubbard be detained pending trial. Hubbard moved for review of the magistrate judge’s detention order. After a hearing, Hubbard’s motion was denied. This Memorandum Opinion sets forth in further detail the basis for that ruling.
Hubbard v. Wansleypublic domain
954 So.2d 951 (2007) Ruby Angela HUBBARD and Pinkie J. Hubbard, Individually and On Behalf of and In her Capacity as Guardian of her Daughter Ruby Angela Hubbard. v. Billy M. WANSLEY, M.D. No. 2005-CA-01055-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 26, 2007. *954 R. Allen Smith, Jr., Lance Paul Bradley, for appellants. Mary
Sheffield v. City of Fort Thomas, Ky.public domain
620 F.3d 596 (2010) William SHEFFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FORT THOMAS, KENTUCKY; Mary Brown, Mayor; Barbara Runge, James Doepker, Roger Peterman, Barbara Thompson-Levine, and Tom Lampe, Council Members; and Eric Haas, Mayor Pro-Tem; in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-5619. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued:
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Hubbardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 10, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER HUBBARD Appeal from the Shelby County Criminal Court No. 1004027 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge No. W2011-01078-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 15, 2012 Christopher Hubbard (“the Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of aggr
State of Tennessee v. Eric Hubbardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ERIC HUBBARD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 07-06938 W. Mark Ward, Judge No. W2009-00977-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 27, 2010 A Shelby County jury found the defendant guilty of carjacking, a Class B felony, and the trial
Trans Rail America, Inc. v. Hubbard Townshippublic domain
{¶ 44} With regard to appellant's first assignment of error, I concur with the majority's conclusion that appellant did not properly effectuate the 1983 zoning resolution, and therefore, it was of no force and effect. Accordingly, the trial court properly declared that the 1954 "industrial" zoning designation was applicable to the subject property. {¶ 45} Unlike the majority, however, I believe that the trial court exceeded its authority by
Ruby Angela Hubbard v. Billy M. Wansleypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2005-CA-01055-SCT RUBY ANGELA HUBBARD AND PINKIE J. HUBBARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF AND IN HER CAPACITY AS GUARDIAN OF HER DAUGHTER RUBY ANGELA HUBBARD v. BILLY M. WANSLEY, M.D. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/25/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KOSTA N. VLAHOS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS:
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Hubbardpublic domain
BROWN, J. (1) The case was submitted to the jury on the issues presented by the second count of the complaint, and the defendant’s plea of the general issue. This count alleged that, while plaintiff was rightfully in the defendant’s mine as a workman in the employ of one Baker, who was working for defendant as a contractor engaged in and about mining iron ore for defendant in its mine, a large rock const
Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.public domain
LEAHY, Senior District Judge. This is a declaratory judgment action brought by plaintiff praying that certain of defendant’s patents be declared invalid and not infringed by plaintiff. Defendant answered and counterclaimed that plaintiff is infringing defendant’s 2,370,219; 2,403,897; and 2,593,957. The parties have been engaged in pretrial discovery. The present matter arises on six pending motions. <
Sheffield v. GIBBS BROS. AND CO.public domain
This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in a declaratory judgment action. The trial court construed a mineral reservation to include coal and lignite, and this appeal resulted. On August 4, 1955, the appellee, Gibbs Brothers, conveyed by deed 1,127 acres of land located in Grimes County, Texas, to E.E. Townes. All of the defendants trace their title to this deed. Two tracts carved out of the conveyance to Townes, known as the Sheffield and Werneke tracts, were leased
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Wilkespublic domain
This is an action for damages to plaintiff's land which is alleged to adjoin that of defendant Sloss-Sheffield Steel Iron Company, and claimed to be due to the drainage of surface water out of the springs and wells on plaintiff's land produced by a falling in of the roofs of two closely connected mines of said defendant, also causing cracks and crevices to occur on the surface of plaintiff's land in places. One Immler was sued with the company, as well as another employee. A judgment
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Wilkespublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 175 This is a second appeal in this case. See 231 Ala. 511,165 So. 764, 770, 109 A.L.R. 385. After it was reversed, and on the second trial, the complaint was amended so as to charge the wrongful act against
Finerson v. Hubbardpublic domain
This is a statutory action in ejectment for 1 1/2 acres of land located near Dolomite in Jefferson County, Alabama. The plaintiffs are Mattie Cora Young and Dora Finerson. The defendants are Melvin Hubbard, Roy Hubbard and Lois Wright Foster. Trial of the cause resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants. This suit was filed on the 15th day of September, 1948. The plaintiffs claim the property sued for as the sole heirs at law of Dave Bell who died in 1911. Tendencies
Jim Beard and Hubbard Beard v. Melvin Stephenspublic domain
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: This is an action for damages under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343, filed pro se by two inmates of Kilby Prison, Alabama, for alleged wrongs claimed to arise under the Civil Rights Acts. 1 Appellants allege the following. On or about June 14,
Belcher v. Hubbardpublic domain
Plaintiff below obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorney's fee, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938,29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. From this judgment defendant below brings this appeal. During the time in question, appellant was engaged in the manufacture of lumber and appellee was employed as a common laborer, as distinguished from a skilled workman. It is without c
Curtiss v. Inhabitants of Sheffieldpublic domain
Hammond, J. The general findings of the master that none of the taxes have been paid and that no tender of the amounts due has been made are justified by the subsidiary findings set out in the report, and must stand. So far therefore as the plaintiff relies upon payment or tender he fails. He contends, however, that the deeds are void by reason of irregularities in the proceedings of assessment and sale; and
Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. Jacobspublic domain
Eschweiler, J. (dissenting). By the affirmance of the judgment of the court below judicial sanction and thereby judicial approval is given .to the allowance as stipulated damages of an amount of not less than $4 per barrel for breach of a contract to buy such a staple necessary essential as flour, sold at the agreed price of $12.10 per barrel. This item of so-called damages necessarily includes the profits of th
Woodward Iron Co. v. Hubbardpublic domain
A full statement of the facts necessary to an understanding of the question here treated is found in the dissenting opinion of Justice GARDNER, and such statement of facts is here adopted by reference thereto, without being here repeated. The majority are of the opinion that the track upon which the "coke pusher machine" in question was operated is not a "railway," nor "any part of the track of a railway," within the meaning of subdivision 5 of the Employers' Liability Act (Code 1907,
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Jonespublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 9 O. L. Jones sues the Sloss-Sheffield Steel Iron Company, claiming damages for personal injuries received by him caused by a rock falling from the face of the room in its coal mine in which plaintiff had been assigned to work by the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on three counts. They were lett
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Deanpublic domain
The facts in this case relative to the operation of the mine in question are very similar to the statement of facts as set out in the opinion of Mr. Justice Thomas in the case of Amerson v. Corona Coal Coke Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 So. 601, in which the Supreme Court held that the question as to whether the contract of lease was a subterfuge was properly submitted to the jury. Upon similar statements of fact, the decision in