Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Huang v. United States Of America”
United States v. Biao Huangpublic domain
OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Biao Huang, a native and citizen of China residing in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute various quantities of methamphetamine, including one quantity of more than 900 grams. The district court sentenced Huang to 135
United States v. Huangpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Guo Xin Huang appeals his federal jury convictions and sentence for conspiracy to import marijuana, attempted smuggling of marijuana, and attempted importation of marijuana. As the parties are familiar with the facts, procedural history, and arguments, we will not recount them here. We reverse Huang’s convictions on all counts and remand for a new trial or further proceedings consistent herewi
United States v. Fu Jen Huangpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * The United States appeals the sentence of Frank Fu Jen Huang following his guilty plea to seven counts of conspiracy, trafficking in counterfeit goods, and manufacturing and selling counterfeit goods. The Presentence Report recommended a Guidelines sentencing offense level of 28 which provides a sentencing range of 78-97 months of imprisonment. The district court sentenced Huang to six months
Yu Yun Huang v. Attorney General of United Statespublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Yu Yun Huang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). For the following reasons, we will deny the petition. I. Huang entered the United States in November 2001. Shortly thereafter, she was placed in removal proceedings and charged under
United States v. Guo Xin Huangpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Guo Xin Huang appeals from his jury conviction and sentence for conspiracy to import marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, attempted importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952, and attempting to smuggle marijuana, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545. As the parties are familiar with the facts and prior proeeedings, we will not recount them here. Huang raises several arguments
United States v. Long Huang Youpublic domain
198 F.Supp.2d 393 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. LONG HUANG YOU, Defendant. No. 01 CR 960(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 28, 2002. *394 *395 W.S. Wilson Leung, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, New
United States v. Da Ping Huangpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises a question of first impression in this circuit, and apparently the nation, relating to the enforcement of a cooperative plea agreement in the course of the sentencing proceedings under the United States Guidelines. In determining whether the Government breached its agreement under the plea agree
United States v. Huangpublic domain
827 F.Supp. 945 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. George HUANG, William Chen and, Ho-Hsin Fan, Defendants. No. 92 Cr. 996 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 22, 1993. *946 Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y. by Michael Gertzman, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for the U.S. Roger Bernstein, Ne
Yafei Huang v. Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Yafei Huang appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment on claims related to a denial of life insurance benefits by Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”), the ERISA plan administrator for her deceased husband’s former employer. LINA denied benefits, determining th
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-3204 ____________ JATHURSAN THANKARASA, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES ____________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Imm
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted defendants William Chen and George Huang under 18 U.S.C. § 371 of conspiracy to bring 150 aliens into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A), (1)(D), and (2)(B)(ii). They appeal from a sentence imposed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert P. Patterson, Jr., Judge) under th
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-1854 ____________ YAHYE HERROW, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency No. A0
United States v. Henry Huang, A/K/A Kok Kheng Tanpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellant Huang brings this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3742(a)(2), (b)(2), (a)(3)(A) and (a)(3)(B), contending that the district court incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines and imposed a sentence which is greater than the sentence specified in the applicable guideline range for 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), smuggling
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Mike Huang, John Chu, Paul Park, and Kwan Yue Cheoi appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, *1130 Robert P. Patterson, Jr., Judge, entered upon declaration of a mistrial, denying their mo
Franchise Svc of North America v. United States Trpublic domain
Case: 18-60093 Document: 00514512729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 REVISED June 14, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 22, 2018
United States v. Lesliepublic domain
658 F.3d 140 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Sadiki Komunyaka LESLIE, Defendant-Appellant.[*] Docket No. 10-2994-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 13, 2011. Decided: October 3, 2011. *141 William T. Koch, Jr., Koch and Koch, Lyme, CT, for Defendant-Appe
Chen v. Wen Jing Huangpublic domain
Salinger, Kenneth W., J. The fifteen plaintiffs are owed wages totaling $51,390.54 for work they did as employees of Millennium Daycare, Inc. By law, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover treble damages totaling $154,171.62, plus reasonable attorneys fees and litigation costs. Defendant Wen Jing Huang is personally liable for these amounts because she was Millennium’s president and managed the corporation’s business. See G.L.c. 149
Wu Winfred Huang v. EZCORP, Inc.public domain
ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants EZCORP, Inc. and Mark Kuchenrither (Defendants)’ Motion to Dismiss [#50], Có-Lead Plaintiffs Wu' Winfred Huang and John Rooney’s Response [# 52] in opposition, and Defendants’ Reply'[#53] in support. Having reviewed the documents, the arguments of t
Tianbo Huang v. iTV Media, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Tianbo Huang (“plaintiff’) brings this action for breach of contract, fraud, and related claims based upon promises allegedly made to him before he was hired by iTV Media. In short, plaintiff alleges that defendants — various iTV entities and their President and Chief Executive Officer, Song Lin — promised him certain responsibilities and compensa
Jing Huang v. Bicycle Casino, Inc.public domain
Opinion FLIER, J. Jing Huang was injured boarding a shuttle bus provided by The Bicycle Casino, Inc. (Bicycle Casino or the casino), which transported passengers from Monterey Park to Bicycle Casino in Bell Gardens. Huang sued Bicycle Casino for negligence. The trial court granted Bicycle Casino’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.