Cases

*714 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Shan Hua Jiang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the October 31, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the June 13, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Elizabeth A. Lamb, pretermitting his application for asylum, and denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

SUMMARY ORDER At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 7th day of March, two thousand and six. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) is DENIED.

Opinion issued June 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00110-CV ——————————— HUA HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant V. SAVA CHANTEAU,

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01165-CV TIAN JIA, Appellant V. HUA XU, Appellee On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Zhan Hua Cao (2018 NY Slip Op 02603) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Zhan Hua Cao 2018 NY Slip Op 02603 Decided on April 18, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C.J. On March 29, 2010, this court accepted petitioner/ defendant-appellant Jing Hua Xiao’s application for a writ of certiorari to review the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) December 3, 2009 judgment on appeal, entered pursuant to its November 13, 2009 summary disposition order. Therein, the ICA affirmed the District Court of the First Circuit’s1

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Zhou Hua Zhu seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying him asylum and ordering him removed to the People’s Republic of China. At issue in this appeal is whether the BIA erred when it overturned the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) factual findings — particularly the finding that Zhu would likely be forcibly sterilized

JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-19-00302-CV HICHAM WATANABE, Appellant V. SUMMIT PATH PARTNERS, LLC; HOCINE AITMOHAND; A. J. AHMED; AND EDWARD HUA, Appellees Appeal from the 11th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014-4

Opinion issued August 10, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00302-CV ——————————— HICHAM WATANABE, Appellant V. SUMMIT PATH PARTNERS, LLC; HOCINE AITMOHAND; A.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Hua Li petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) decision denying her motion to reopen her immigration proceedings. We will deny the petition for review. Li originally applied for asylum and other relief based on threats she received for refusing to marry a government official in *780

OPINION PER CURIAM. Hua Li petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) decision denying her motion to reopen her immigration proceedings. We will deny the petition for review. Li originally applied for asylum and other relief based on threats she received for refusing to marry a government official in *780

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 3, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01167-CV CATHY X. CLARK, ROSS A. CLARK AND HUA XU, Appellants V. CHARLES HAMMOND, III, Appellee On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas

Motion Granted in Part; Order filed April 18, 2013 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-01167-CV ____________ CATHY X. CLARK, ROSS A. CLARK AND HUA XU, Appellants V. CHARLES HAMMOND III, Appellee On Appeal from the

Order filed, January 14, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-01167-CV ____________ CATHY X. CLARK, ROSS A. CLARK AND HUA XU, Appellant V. CHARLES HAMMOND III, Appellee On Appeal from the 157th District Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Perpetual Securities, Inc. (Perpetual) appeals from a judgment and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Owen, /., denying Perpetual’s petition to vacate an arbitration award, granting respondents-appellees’ petition for confirmation of the award, and granting Rule 11 sanctions against Perpet

ACCEPTED 01-15-00396-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/8/2015 7:07:05 AM

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: January 24, 2023 PrePrecedent of the TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Order filed, December 13, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00730-CV ____________ HUA XU, Appellant V. DAVID K. LAM (AKA'S: KA PUN LAM, KA P. LAM, DAVID LAM, KAPUN LAM) SUN, INDIVIDUALLY AND JIA TIAN AKA ANGELA

Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00730-CV HUA XU, Appellant V. DAVID K. LAM A/K/A KA PUN LAM A/K/A KA P. LAM A/K/A DAVID LAM A/K/A KAPUN LAM AND JIA TIAN A/K/A ANGELA TIAN, Appellees On Appeal

Order filed February 14, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00730-CV ____________ HUA XU, Appellant V. DAVID K. LAM, AKA KA PUN LAM, KA P. LAM, DAVID LAM, KAPUN LAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND JIA TIAN AKA ANGELA TIAN, Appellees