Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. Introduction This case has a long history — seven and a half years and counting. This is a class action against Defendant Volkswagen of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”) commenced in the Erie County Common Pleas Court in August 2004. Defendant filed a Notice of Removal on November 3, 2011, asserting j

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge This case raises a constitutional challenge to the funding mechanism enacted by the District of Columbia to continue the operations of the District of Columbia Health Benefit Exchange (the “D.C. Exchange”) beginning on January 1, 2015. The D.C. Exchange was established under th

This is an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court from a judgment of guilt, together with an appeal from a judgment denying a motion for a new trial. A petty jury in the Circuit Court found McCullough guilty of mayhem and fixed his punishment at twenty years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. This case is a companion case to Mabry v. State, Ala.App., 110 So.2d 250. The facts set forth in the Mabry opinion are incorporated herein by ref

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FINAL JUDGMENT DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE GROUNDS B AND C, AND DENYING THE REMAINDER OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief Judge. This is a petition for a writ of federal habeas corpus by a state prisoner in custody at the Missouri State Penitentiary (Church Farm) at Jefferson City, Missouri. Petitioner seeks an adjudication that his conviction and sentence were secured

El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Este caso plantea cuestiones sensitivas referentes a la figura de cosa juzgada y sus excepciones. En específico, ana-lizamos el efecto que tiene en esta jurisdicción una sentencia desestimatoria por inacción dictada por el Tribunal Federal de los Estados Unidos para el Distrito de Puerto Rico. h-4 Francisco Ramos Go

Appellant filed her bill to set aside and cancel a deed to certain real estate in Yazoo City. The cause was tried on bill, answer, and proofs, resulting in a decree in appellee's favor. The bill charged that appellant was a resident of the state of Mississippi, and that while temporarily out of the state she was sued by appellee in attachment, upon the ground that she was a nonresident of this state; that judgment was rendered against her in said suit, and execution issued upon the jud

CONCURRING OPINION. I do not know what the meaning is of that clause of this will which provides a limitation over on the death of the testatrix' three sisters, Bessie, Margie, and Stella, of their interest in the property devised to them and the heirs of Eva Cross. An opinion by me would be a mere guess that most probably would be less correct — I speak with deference — than the one here made by my associates. This should be qualified to th

98 F.Supp. 730 (1951) KIMBLE v. WILLEY. Civ. No. 353. United States District Court E. D. Arkansas, E. D. June 22, 1951. *731 Cracraft & Cracraft (George K. Cracraft), Helena, Ark., Bailey & Warren (Bruce T. Bullion), Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff. Moncrief & Moncrief (John W. Moncrief), Stuttgart, Ark., for

DELEHANT, District Judge. The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation lawfully doing business in Arkansas, instituted this action against the two designated defendants, both citizens of Arkansas. It sought to obtain a judgment or decree quieting in it and against the defendants the title to two designated parcels of Saline County, Arkansas land, the separate parts of which were allegedly claimed by the several defendants. After th

El Juez Asociado Señor Serrano Geyls emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El 10 de febrero de 1955 el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico y la Autoridad sobre Hogares de Puerto Rico, como demandantes, y Martín Aguayo como demandado, some-tieron al Tribunal Superior, Sala de Expropiaciones, una Es-tipulación sobre expropiación forzosa amparándose en las disposiciones de la Regla 7(d) de las Reglas de Enju

The plaintiffs in error were each convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree without capital punishment and were sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary. This proceeding in error was instituted to secure a review of the cause. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is assigned as error. Upon the trial in the District Court of Sweetwater county it appeared that on the evening of February 16th, 1923, at Rock Springs, Wyoming, one Frank Ferlic was shot and kille

DISSENTING OPINION. VALLIANT, J. In this suit the plaintiff invokes the jurisdiction of a court of equity to grant her relief from a judgment rendered against her in a court of law on the ground that she had a good and lawful defensé to the action as was well known to the plaintiff in that action, but -was afforded no opportunity to make *587that defense

./ I-;:. LJ 0 This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. RECEIVED IN 0 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 30 2Ui5 n THE STATE OF TEXAS