Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Howell v. Perry”
Justin C. Howell v. Grady Perry, Wardenpublic domain
07/30/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 13, 2021 Session JUSTIN C. HOWELL v. GRADY PERRY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 16675 Christopher Sockwell, Judge ___________________________________
Howell v. Statepublic domain
Paul Augustus Howell, a prisoner under sentence of death and under an active death warrant, appeals the summary denial of a second successive motion for post-conviction relief filed on February 21, 2013, just three days after this Court affirmed the denial of his prior successive motion for postconviction relief. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. The Court expedited the briefing and after reviewing the motion, the briefs,
Howell v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Paul Augustus Howell, a prisoner under sentence and active warrant of death, appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his successive motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.1 Howell was convicted and sentenced to death when the bomb he constructed, with the specific purpose of killing a witness, instead detonated and killed a
Perry-Anderson v. Howard University Hospitalpublic domain
*139 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL Chief Judge The plaintiff, Donna Perry-Anderson, brings this action against her former employer, Howard University Hospital (“HUH”),, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq,, asse
Paul Augustus Howell v. State of Floridapublic domain
PER CURIAM. Paul Augustus Howell is a prisoner under sentence of death for whom a death warrant has been signed and execution set for February 26, 2014. Howell was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death when the bomb he constructed, for the specific purpose of killing a witness, instead detonated and killed a Florida Highway Patrol Trooper. Howell v. S
State v. Howellpublic domain
LANSING, J. The State appeals from the order of the district court granting defendant Leon Howell a new trial based on the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence at the original trial. Because we conclude that most of the evidence in question was admissible and that any error was harmless, we reverse the order granting a new trial. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY H
Scotty Howell v. Kimberly Howellpublic domain
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 97 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION III integrity of this document No. CV-20-275 2023.06.22 14:54:39 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 OPINION DELIVERED: MARCH 3, 2021 SCOTTY HOWELL
Perry v. Estate of Perrypublic domain
473 S.E.2d 860 (1996) Jennie PERRY, Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF John L. PERRY and Jack L. Schoer, Esquire as Escrow Agent, Respondents. No. 2534. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted June 4, 1996. Decided July 8, 1996. *862 Gregory P. Harlow, Aiken, for appellant. Raymond A. Dufour, (for the Estat
Bowen v. Howellpublic domain
BOWEN vs. HOWELL, MISC 20-000088 MARY BOWEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL E. HOWELL, et al., Defendants, and MYGAM DANG, et al., Parties-in-Interest MISC 20-000088 AUGUST 13, 2021 MIDDLESEX, ss. SMITH, J. DECISION <
Perry v. Rockmorepublic domain
Perry v Rockmore (2025 NY Slip Op 01141) Perry v Rockmore 2025 NY Slip Op 01141 Decided on February 27, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Egan Jr., J.P. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KM-00265-COA BENJAMIN NATHAN HOWELL A/K/A APPELLANT BENJAMIN HOWELL v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL PAUL MILLS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: BENJAMIN NATHAN HOWELL (PRO SE) ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
Crayton-Howell v. Statepublic domain
OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-defendant Lamont Crayton, Howell (Howell) contests his conviction for Carrying a Handgun without a License,1 a Class C felony.2 Specifically, he claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence seized during an allegedly illegal search of his vehicle. FACTS On November 16, 1994, India
Howell v. Heafnerpublic domain
Howell v. Heafner, 2020 NCBC 65. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 19 CVS 21708 GAIL I. HOWELL, individually and on behalf of the GAIL I. HOWELL IRA; KEA L. HRVATIN; SCOTT J. HRVATIN; STEVEN RAPP; ALICE G. SHRADER, individually and on behalf of the ALICE G. SHRADER IRA; JONATHAN A. TURNER, individually and on behalf of the JONATHAN A. T
United States v. Howell (In Re Howell)public domain
120 B.R. 137 (1990) In re Brian F. HOWELL and Kimberly A. Howell, Debtor(s). UNITED STATES of America, Appellant(s), v. Brian F. HOWELL and Kimberly A. Howell, Appellee(s). BAP No. ID 90-1103-AsPV, Bankruptcy No. 88-01411, Adv. No. 88-0289. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 14, 1990. Decided Novemb
Perry v. East Bay Regional Park Districtpublic domain
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976 and 976.1, the opinion in the above-entitled matter is ordered certified for publication in the Official Reports, with the exception of: (1) part B.2.a., and footnotes 9 and 10 (p. 11); and (2) part B.2.C, and footnotes 13 and 14 (p. 14). However, the final paragraph in part B.2.C., on page 14, commencing with "In conclusion . . .," should be included in the published po
Perry v. Perry Brothers, Inc.public domain
753 S.W.2d 773 (1988) Keith S. PERRY, Appellant, v. PERRY BROTHERS, INC., Appellee. No. 05-87-00603-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 21, 1988. *774 Charles C. Frederiksen, Cynthia M. Jost, W. Alan Wright, Haynes & Boone, Dallas, for appellant. James R. Cornelius, Jr., Mark E. Casburn, Zeleskey, Cornelius, Ro
United States v. Gene Howellpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0253p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plain
Howell v. McAuliffepublic domain
Amici Curiae: Robert N. Tracci; Edward Stein, Norfolk; W. Lyle Carver; Darrel W. Puckett, Appomattox; Theophani K. Stamos, Arlington; Joel R. Branscom; Paul A. McAndrews ; William W. Davenport, Chesterfield; Paul Walther, Culpeper; Ann Cabell Baskervill; Raymond F. Morrogh, Fairfax; James P. Fisher ; Eric Branscom; Jeff Haislip; Allen 'A.J.' W. Dudley, Jr., Rocky Mount; Ross P. Spicer; Tracy Quackenbush Martin; R.E. 'Trip' Chalkley, III ; M. Andrew Nester; J
Perry v. Greenpublic domain
437 S.E.2d 150 (1993) Judith Elena PERRY, f/k/a Judith G. Cooper, Respondent-Appellant, v. James M. GREEN, III, Appellant-Respondent. No. 2069. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard June 15, 1993. Decided August 23, 1993. *151 Charles E. Carpenter, Jr., and Deborah L. Harrison, of Richardson, Plowden, Grier &
Howell v. McAuliffepublic domain
PRESENT: All the Justices WILLIAM J. HOWELL, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 160784 CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS July 22, 2016 TERENCE R. McAULIFFE, ET AL. UPON A PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION The dominant role in articulation of public policy in the Commonwealth of Virginia rests with the e