Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Howe v. Kaal”
KSTP-TV v. Ramsey Countypublic domain
OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. This appeal asks us to decide how sealed absentee ballots that were rejected and never counted during the 2008 general election are classified under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Minn.Stat. ch. 13 (2010). Appellant television stations KSTP-TV, KSTC-TV, WDIO-TV, KAAL-TV, and KSAX-TV, alleging that the ballots are public government data under the M
Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. This suit for breach of contract is brought on behalf of a putative class of investors seeking to recover fees that defendants Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited and Standard Chartered Bank (collectively, “Defendants”) charged for managing investments in the Fairfield Sentry Limited fund (“Sentry Fund”). The Sentry Fund wa
Alexander Ross v. Robinson, Hoover & Fudge, PLLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0120p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ALEXANDER ROSS, │ Plaintiff-Appella
State v. Auerswaldpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Auerswald, 2013-Ohio-742.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 11CA0053-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE DENNIS K. AUERSWALD
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.public domain
OPINION PAGE, Justice. Respondents Greg and Harlan Siewert, doing business as Siewert Holsteins, sued appellant Northern States Power Compa*276ny (NSP) for damages and injunctive relief based on negligence, strict liability, trespass, and nuisance for stray voltage, which they claim was caused by an electric distribution system owned and operated b
Mich. Gun Owners, Inc. v. Ann Arbor Pub. Sch.public domain
McCormack, J. **700*759The defendants, the Ann Arbor and Clio school districts, each have a policy banning firearms on school property. The plaintiffs, advocacy organizations supporting gun ownership and certain parents of children who attend school in t
Morgan v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
473 F.Supp.2d 756 (2007) Kerry L. MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, Defendant. No. 05-73373. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 9, 2007. *757 *758
Bell River Associates v. China Charter Townshippublic domain
565 N.W.2d 695 (1997) 223 Mich. App. 124 BELL RIVER ASSOCIATES a/k/a Belle River Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHINA, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 176879. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted August 20, 1996, at Detroit. Decided April 18, 1997, at 9:40 a.m. Released for Publication July 16,
294 N.W.2d 297 (1980) MINNESOTA-IOWA TELEVISION COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant, v. WATONWAN T.V. IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Appellant-Respondent. Nos. 50290, 50348. Supreme Court of Minnesota. May 30, 1980. *301 Leonard, Street & Deinard, Sidney Barrows and Charles A. Mays, Minneapolis, for respondent-appellant. Birkholz
Detroit Edison Co. v. City of Wixompublic domain
T. M. Kavanagh, J. We concur in the opinion of Chief Justice T. E. Brennan as to the first issue and the result reached on the second issue. On the latter issue we concur in the result reached for the following reasons: The legal principle is firmly established that zoning ordinances, when related to the public health, morals, safety, or general welfare, are a valid exercise of the police power, provided t
Republic of Hawaii v. Kanalopublic domain
OPINION OP THE COURT BY JUDD, C.J. The defendant was charged in the District Court of Honolulu as taken down by tbe clerk of said court, as follows: The Republic of Hawaii v. Kanalo. District Court of Honolulu, Island of Oahu, Saturday January 22, 1898. Charged with violating Section 15, Act 21, Laws Provisional Government during one week prior to January 22, 1898, by co
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinionpublic domain
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN xr8. Wlllla,~094sal>. County Auditor Oarson Coculty Panhandle, Texas Dear Mrs. O*Neal: opinion HO A o-222 use or the as - r0r 0p recdvsa and