Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Howard v. Jester 4 Unit”
Howard v. Gishpublic domain
36 Md. App. 446 (1977) 373 A.2d 1280 ROGER HOWARD ET AL. v. JAMES L. GISH. No. 1017, September Term, 1976. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 13, 1977. The cause was argued before GILBERT, C.J., and MORTON and MENCHINE, JJ. Robert Paul Phillips, III and J. Russell Robinson for appellants.
Bouchat v. Bon-Ton Department Stores, Inc.public domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion in which Judge NIEMEYER joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate concurring opinion. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is the latest in a series of appeals in copyright infringement cases arising out of the design and use of the logo for the Baltimore Ravens football team. In *3
State v. Preecepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Preece, 2024-Ohio-1556.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 22AP-252 v. : (C.P.C. No. 19CR-4791) William D. Preece,
Seaboard Corp. v. Grindrod Ltd.public domain
248 S.W.3d 27 (2008) SEABOARD CORPORATION, et al., Respondents, v. GRINDROD LIMITED, et al., Appellants. No. WD 67628. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 15, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied April 15, 2008. *29 Patr
Chamberlain v. Pylepublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD M. CHAMBERLAIN ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N18C-07-035 SKR ) OFFICER GEORGE PYLE ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: January 5, 2023 Decided: February 6, 2023
United States v. Katalinicpublic domain
510 F.3d 744 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel KATALINIC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1588. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 13, 2007. Decided December 19, 2007. Michael Donovan (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Ross M. Eagle (argue
Guffie v. Statepublic domain
304 Ga. 352 FINAL COPY S18A0861. GUFFIE v. THE STATE. HUNSTEIN, Justice. Following a jury trial, Quantavious Guffie was found guilty of malice murder and various other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Drexel Berry.1 Guffie appeals, raising claims of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel; finding no error, we affirm. The underlying facts of this case have already come before this Court in the appeal of Guffie’s
Guffie v. Statepublic domain
Hunstein, Justice *610**352Following a jury trial, Quantavious Guffie was found guilty of malice murder and various other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Drexel Berry.1 Guffie appeals, raising claims of trial court error and ineffectiv
Hinton v. Statepublic domain
KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice Appellant Kenneth Hinton appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Hinton was convicted of one count of first-degree battery and one count of second-degree battery and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment and fifteen years' imprisonment respectively. Hinton's convictions and sentences were affirmed in Hinton v
State v. Superior Manufacturingpublic domain
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge. The Secretary of State challenges the trial court’s order vacating the Commissioner of Securities’ final order to cease and desist and imposing civil penalties and costs upon Superior Manufacturing, Inc., and Kevin W. and Wendy D. Gross, and quashing the garnishment. Because the trial court failed to receive and review the Commissioner’s record as required by Chapter 536, RSMo,1
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDApublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 12, 2023 No. 23-10362 Lyle W. Cayce
Pippin v. Statepublic domain
271 S.W.3d 861 (2008) Roddy Dean PIPPIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 07-07-0493-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. November 24, 2008. Scott Howard Pawgan, Conroe, for Appellant. John Staley Heatly, Dist. Atty., Vernon, for Appellee. Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. OPINION PATRICK A. PIRTLE,
State v. Everettepublic domain
652 S.E.2d 241 (2007) STATE of North Carolina v. Haseen Herman EVERETTE. No. 452A05. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 9, 2007. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel S. Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the state-appellee/appellant. Richard E. Jester, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant/appellee. MARTIN, Justice. This case r
Tankersley v. Martinrea Heavy Stampings, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Anthony Tankersley is a former employee of Martinrea Heavy Stampings, Inc., who alleges that he was injured on the job and is now substantially limited in his ability to work and live a normal life. [R. 1-3 at 5.] Following his injury, Tankersley was terminated from employment. [Id. at 2-3.] He now alleges that his terminatio
King v. Statepublic domain
657 S.E.2d 570 (2008) KING v. The STATE. No. A08A0732. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 31, 2008. *571 Richard William Marks, Clarkesville, for Appellant. Paul L. Howard Jr., Dist. Atty., Atlanta, and John O. Williams, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lawrenceville, for Appellee. BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge. Following a
State v. Everettepublic domain
616 S.E.2d 237 (2005) STATE of North Carolina v. Haseen Herman EVERETTE. No. COA03-858. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 2, 2005. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Daniel S. Johnson, for the State. Richard E. Jester, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant. *238 McGEE, Judge. Has
Spencer v. Statepublic domain
334 S.W.3d 559 (2010) Frederick SPENCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, et al., Respondent. No. WD 72100. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. December 28, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 1, 2011. Application for Transfer Denied April 26, 2011. *561<
San Jacinto River Authority v. Andy Raypublic domain
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H
State v. Maxwellpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Maxwell, 2020-Ohio-3027.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107758 v. : CHARLES MAXWELL, :
203 S.W.3d 111 (2006) SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF NATUROPATHY d/b/a Southern College of Naturopathic Medicine, and Gary Axley, D.O.M., Appellants, v. STATE of Arkansas ex rel Mike BEEBE, Attorney General, Appellee, 04-862 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion Delivered February 10, 2005 TOM GLAZE, Associate Justice This is the second appeal before this court involving Ga