Cases

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00819-CR DAVID HOWARD EDWARDS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial

9 Kan. App. 2d 763 (1984) 689 P.2d 911 JUDY L. HYRE HOWARD, Appellant, v. CONNIE J. EDWARDS, Appellee. No. 56,145 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed October 11, 1984. James M. Sheeley, of Kansas City, for the appellant. William P. Coates, Jr., of Rushfelt, Mueller, Druten and Moran, of Overland Park, for the appell

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 27, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A27D0051. AYESHA HOWARD v. ANTHONY EDWARDS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 24CV012210 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk'

ORDER PER CURIAM: This order is being issued because of Mr. Edwards’s persistent filing of frivolous petitions despite a court order notifying him that he could be sanctioned for continuing to do so. This case has been before the Court since June 20, 2002, when Mr. Edwards filed a Notice of Appeal with respect to two June 17, 200

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is just one of many constitutional challenges to a bond system that may require indigent arrestees to post secured money bond in an amount set in a bond schedule to avoid pretrial detention. *1139See, e.g., ODonnell v. Harris County (ODonnel

ORDER PER CURIAM: Lester Edwards appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the prosecutor’s peremptory strike of a venireperson. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been pro

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Panel: Beachley, Shaw Geter, Fader, JJ. Fader, J. *519 Carolyn Howard, the appellant, presents the question whether a police officer may be held individually liable in tort for failing to make contact with an individual who placed a call for assistance to 911 to which th

Brown, Judge. Nyquarious Edwards pleaded guilty to hijacking a motor vehicle, armed robbery, aggravated assault with intent to rob, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appeals pro se from the trial court's order dismissing his "motion to vacate void sentences and withdraw his guilty plea," contending that his se

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff brought this lawsuit against four state officials who each play a role in Randolph County’s alleged unconstitutional pretrial detention scheme — “one in which indigent arrestees are jailed because of their inability to make bond, while well-. to-do arrestees are able to quickl

MORRIS, Judge. In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), Thomas Douglas Edwards appeals the revocation of his sex offender probation for the offense of un *124 lawful sexual activity with a minor and the resulting 71.7-month prison se

Sharon Johnson Coleman, United States District Court Judge The defendant, Jackie Edwards, is charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Edwards now moves this Court to suppress the evidence that was recovered as a result of a traffic stop and the subsequent search of

MORRIS, Judge. Travis Montez Edwards appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine. Because we conclude that the State failed to prove that Edwards was in constructive possession of the .cocaine, the trial court erred by denying Edwards’s motion for judgment of acquittal. We therefore reverse and remand. I. Background

Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 318,396; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 49,-965-KA | granted.

Order Per Curiam: Victor A. Edwards appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Sullivan County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: Plaintiffs complaint alleges that Defendants fraudulently induced Plaintiff to move from Chile to New York to work as their children’s nanny. The complaint alleges that upon arrival to the United States, Plaintiff was subjected to involuntary servitude compelled by the intentional deprivation of medical care, food,

*106 ORDER PER CURIAM: Richard Edwards Jr. appeals his conviction and twelve-year sentence for class A felony financial exploitation of the elderly, section 570.145, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. He raises three points on appeal regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and closing argument. Because a published opinion would have no precedential val

VILLANTI, Judge. Edward James Howard appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a firearm. Because the State improperly bolstered its witness and made improper arguments during closing argument that amounted to fundamental error, we must reverse his conviction and remand for a new trial. Howard was arrested following an armed robbery that occur

In re Howard, Oliver;—Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 675-382; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA 13-32. Denied. GUIDRY, J., recused.