Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ) DEFENSE LEAGUE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-3134 (APM)

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Karol K. Howard appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on each of her claims, asserting that there exist genuine issues of material fact to be resolved by a jury. After de novo review and examination of the voluminous record, Turner v. Honey

363 F.3d 797 Karol K. HOWARD, Appellant,v.COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT; James R. Ritter, individually and in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Columbia Public Schools; Cheryl Cozette, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Superintendent of the Columbia Public Schools, Appellees. No. 03-1882. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

01/22/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 27, 2024 Session HOWARD HAWK WILLIS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Washington County No. 42660 Thomas J. Wright, Senior Judge ___________

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Abruzzo v. City of Park Ridge, 2013 IL App (1st) 122360 Appellate Court JO ANN ABRUZZO, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Caption Joseph Furio, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CITY OF PARK RIDGE, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Fourth Divisi

*433MEMORANDUM McHUGH, District Judge. This case involves the broad but sometimes hard to define scope of jurisdiction under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). The central question: is this case a simple payment dispute, unworthy of federal jurisdiction, or are Plaintiffs, even though they

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1478 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Robert Murphy alleges that his former employer, the D.C. Department of Corrections (the “DOC”)—and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 1, 2015 Session Heard at Nashville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOWARD HAWK WILLIS Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Washington County No. 28343 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Judge _____________________________ No. E2012-01313-SC-DDT-DD – F

OPINION HOLLY KIRBY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK and JEFFREY S. BIVINS, J.J., joined. SHARON G. LEE, C.J, filed a concurring opinion. This appeal arises from the murder of two teenagers, accompanied by the dismemberment of one of them. A jury convicted the defendant, Howard Hawk Willis, of two counts of premeditated first-degree murder and one count

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 148 {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, John Blust and Ruby Blust, appeal the summary judgment entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, city of Blue Ash, Ohio, in a declaratory-judgment action. The Blusts' Property and

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 16, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOWARD HAWK WILLIS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Washington County No. 28343 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge No. E2012-01313-CCA-R3-DD - Filed March 13, 2015 A Washington County jury convicted appellant, Howard Hawk Willis, of two counts of premed

ACCEPTED 05-15-00369-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:10:20 PM

178 F.Supp.2d 198 (2001) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATED, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Liggett Group, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company, British American Tobacco, Ltd. Defendants. No. 98 CV 3287(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 19, 2001.

133 F.Supp.2d 162 (2001) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. 98 CV 3287(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 27, 2001. *163 Dewey Ballantine LLP, New York by Paul J. Bschorr, Vincent R. FitzPatrick, Jr., Jack E. Pace III

McKEE, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Today we hold that a group of African-American parents and students have not produced sufficient evidence to have a jury decide if race is a factor in how African-American students are assigned to special education classes in their school district. My colleagues reach this result even though the record contains numer

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Summit Health, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Summit”) brought this breach of contract action against APS Healthcare Bethesda, Inc. (“Defendant” or “APS”), alleging that APS failed to pay the full amount due under their service contract. Doc. 1. Sum*384mit alleges that APS has wrongfully withheld payment o

936 F.2d 98 Judith P. MASELLA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF CONNECTICUT, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 1138, Docket 90-7992. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued April 19, 1991.Decided June 19, 1991. Robert J. Cathcart, Hartford, Conn. (Shipman & Goodwin, Lind

505 F.Supp.2d 78 (2007) Valarie JONES, Plaintiff, v. The UNIVERSITY OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-1187 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 17, 2007. *79 *80

*22 Justice HEARN. Our State’s tidelands are a precious public resource held in trust for the people of South Carolina. While the tidelands are a finite resource, a bevy of competing environmental, economic, and social uses seek to lay claim to them. The legislative branch has made the policy decisions as to