Cases

784 A.2d 291 (2001) Joan D. MARTIN v. Evan D. HOWARD et al. No. 99-483-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. November 13, 2001. *292 *293 *294 Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Andrew W. Berg, Providence, Cath

204 F.Supp.2d 1 (2002) Dawn MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendant. No. CIV A 99-1175(TFH/JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 23, 2002. James William Morrison, Holland & Knight, L.L.P., Dawn Valore Martin, Quin Harry Martin, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. James Patrick Schaller, Jackson & Campbell, P.C., D

PAUL G. BYRON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to allow hedonic damages for Mr. Howard's loss of enjoyment of life; that is, his pain and suffering following the infliction of his injuries and up to the moment of his death. (Doc. 110, § III). Defendant Orange County has submitted their Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's motion for hedonic damages. (Doc. 119, § VIII). The

PAUL G. BYRON, UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT William Howard was arrested and booked into an Orlando jail in late 2016 after a domestic incident. Shortly thereafter, he suffered a fractured neck when guards tackled him to the ground in his cell during a use of force incident, and he died the next day. Those events form the basis of this action. Now, Plaintiff Carolyn

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Initially, by my order of April 11, 2001, I refused to relieve plaintiff of her obligation to pay witness fees to the persons she sought to depose. Memorandum Order of April 11, 2001. She has asked me to reconsider that determination. I will do so now. The controlling statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1821(b)(1994), indicates tha

PAUL G. BYRON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court on the following: 1. Defendant Orange County, Florida's, Motion to Dismiss Count Ten of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 23), filed October 2, 2017; 2. Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Orange County, Florida's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40), filed October 16, 2017; 3.

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Eric Martin appeals the re-characterization, without notice, of his pro se petition for medical treatment as an improper habeas corpus petition. Under *712 the rule of In re Shelton, 295 F.3d 620 (6th Cir.2002), ho

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Table of Contents I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .715 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.715 III. LEGAL STANDARD .716 IV. DISCUSSION.717 A. Claim A: Ineffectiveness for Failure to Reasonably Investigate, Develop, and Present Exculpatory Background and Mental Health Ev

WALLACE, Judge. Brad Sanford and Candice Fager (the former Co-Guardians of William Ansley, an incapacitated person) and Stephen M. Martin and Stephen M. Martin, P.A. (the attorney and law firm representing the former Co-Guardians-collectively, Mr. Martin), challenge an order authorizing the payment of $16,520 in attorney’s fees and costs to Mr. Martin as attorney for the former Co-Guardians. The order under review reduces the

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff McKissock, LLC’s, “Verified Complaint ... for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary and Permanent In-junctive Relief and for Damages Against Defendant Karen Tracy Martin” (ECP No, 1) [hereinafter “Verified Complaint”], filed on September 2, 2016; Defendant Karen Tracy Martin

ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, Judge Thomas E. Howard, Jr., Janice K. Howard, and Howard Investments, LLC (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss Appellants’ amended petition for failure to state a claim in favor of TD Ameritrade, Inc. (“Respondent”). Appellants’ amended petition alleged claims for negligence, wrongful garnishment, and wrongful

227 S.W.3d 794 (2006) Scott Hunter HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-05-00728-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. September 5, 2006. Discretionary Review Refused April 4, 2007. Martin LeNoir, Gary A. Udashen, Sorrels & Udashen, Dallas, for appellant. William T. (Bill) Hill, District Attorney, Dallas, Katherine

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-1119 _____________ DAVID BEASLEY, Appellant v. WILLIAM H. HOWARD ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

BUMGARDNER, Judge. James C. Howard, Jr. appeals his convictions of burglary, Code § 18.2-91, and grand larceny, Code § 18.2-95. He maintains the trial court did not have jurisdiction because he was improperly indicted and the indictment was not properly recorded in the order book for the trial court. Finding the procedures followed by

623 F.3d 19 (2010) ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE and Wildlife Institute of Maine, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Roland D. MARTIN, Commissioner of Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-2643. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 8, 2010. Decided October 20, 2010.

PER CURIAM: John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Horton v. Martin, No. CA-04-976 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, William T. Griffin, filed a complaint against the defendant, Sandy Howard Productions, seeking damages for alleged breach of contract, trespass and conversion. Before Sandy Howard filed its answer, it filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Because the petition in bankruptcy was file

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARTIN J. SIEGEL, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. 2024-0146-LWW : CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. and : HOWARD LUTNICK, : : Defendants. :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00947-COA WILLIAM EUGENE HOWARD, JR., TRUSTEE APPELLANT OF THE WILLIAM EUGENE HOWARD, JR. TRUST v. KELLIE NELSON, ADMINISTRATOR WITH APPELLEE WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN CARPENTER NELSON, JR., DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/17/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON

984 F.Supp. 27 (1997) Ronnie WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 97-2161(JHG). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 17, 1997. *28 Clement Theodore Cooper, Washington, DC, for Ronnie Williams, Larry Coleman, Rena Coleman. Paul Raymond Pearson, Arthur, Pe