Cases

855 F.Supp. 825 (1994) Marvin V. HORTON, et al., Plaintiffs v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, Defendant. No. 91-276-CIV-5-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division. May 6, 1994. *826 Marvin Schiller, Law Offices of Marvin Schiller, Raleigh, NC, Marvin A. Miller, Patrick E. Ca

908 F.Supp. 1019 (1995) Barbara C. RUFFINO, Plaintiff, v. STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, David A. Spina, Kenneth D. Stuart, Thomas W. Johnson, Ira B. Gregerman, and Susan G. Rice, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-10188-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 29, 1995. *1020 *1021

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2001 ANOUSH CAB, INC.; ARAMS, INC.; ARARRAT, INC.; ATLANTIC CAB, INC.; BARLOW CAB, INC.; BEDROS CAB, INC.; BOYLSTON CAB, INC.; BRIGHAM CAB, INC.; CLEVELAND CAB, INC.; DIAMOND CAB, INC.; ELSIE CAB, INC.; FENWAY TAXI,INC.; G&A CAB, INC.; JORDAN CAB, INC.; JUBRAN CAB, INC.; KILMARNOCK CAB,INC.; LITTLE ISLAND CAB, INC.; LOCUST CAB, INC.; LONGWOOD CAB, INC.; M & AN CAB, INC.; M.P.E. CAB, INC.; MARBED C

968 S.W.2d 26 (1998) 332 Ark. 520 Pamela F. SKOKOS, Appellant, v. Theodore C. SKOKOS, Appellee. No. 95-1029. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 16, 1998. Order Granting Rehearing June 4, 1998. *28 Henry Hodges, Robert L. Robinson, Jr., Little Rock, for Appellant. Philip E. Dixon, Mont

151 Cal.App.3d 61 (1984) 198 Cal. Rptr. 634 SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents; CITICORP et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents; CROW-SPIEKER # 99, Real Party in Interest a

WIENER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant SongByrd, Inc. (Song-Byrd) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its action seeking to recover from Defendant-Appellee the Estate of Albert B. Grossman d/b/a Bearsville Records (Bears-ville), several master tapes recorded by a legendary New Orleans musician. Concluding that (1) the district court improperly classified SongByrd’s suit as a personal rather than a real action,

REVISED United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 96-30670 Summary Calendar. SONGBYRD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEARSVILLE RECORDS, INC.; Albert B. Grossman, Estate of, erroneously sued as Bearsville Records, Inc., doing business as Bearsville Records, Defendants-Appellees.

104 F.3d 773 SONGBYRD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BEARSVILLE RECORDS, INC.; Albert B. Grossman, Estate of,erroneously sued as Bearsville Records, Inc.,doing business as Bearsville Records,Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-30670Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb. 4, 1997.

638 F.Supp.2d 205 (2009) Iris M. ROSARIO-MÉNDEZ, Plaintiff v. HEWLETT PACKARD CARIBE BV, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1489 (JAG)(JA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 30, 2009. *206 Luisselle Quinones-Maldonado, Heriberto Guivas-Lorenzo, Guivas & Quinones Law Office, Aguada, PR, for Plaintiff. Car

Opinion TSOUCALAS, Judge: Plaintiff, The Torrington Company (“Torring-ton”), challenges certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final results of redetermination entitled The Torrington Company v. United States, Slip Op. 95-54 (March 31, 1995), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), filed on August 1

OPINION SETO, Judge: This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment with all relevant facts stipulated. The single issue before the court is whether certain liabilities, assertedly giving rise to the claimed deductions, have been fixed for the purpose of calculating federal income tax. For the reasons set forth below, the court concludes that plaintiffs motion should be granted and defen

229 F.2d 354 CONTRACT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 15639. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Feb. 2, 1956. Michel G. Emmanuel, Tampa, Fla. (Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields & Ward, Tampa, Fla., of counsel), for petitioner.

628 F.Supp. 871 (1986) WALT DISNEY PRODUCTIONS, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. FILMATION ASSOCIATES, a corporation, Group W Cable, Inc., a corporation, Westinghouse Broadcasting and Cable, Inc., a corporation, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a corporation, Defendants. No. CV852377AHS. United States District Court, C.D. California. February 20, 1986.

410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772

247 Md. 297 (1967) 231 A.2d 32 LEWIS v. HAMMOND [No. 381, September Term, 1966.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 30, 1967. *298 The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS and FINAN, JJ. Kenneth J. Mackley and Howard W. Gilbert, Jr., fo

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

MONTEITH, Chief Justice. This action was brought by appellees Alice L. Jones and her husband, E. R. Jones, for the specific performance of an agreement made by appellant, Harris County, to reconvey to appellees ten-acres of land in Harris County upon the tender by appellees to the County of the consideration recited in said agreement. Harris County answered by general denial and by -a plea that the agreem

Argued April 26, 1937. On March 8, 1937, relator, Alice May Cronhardt, obtained an order for support against her husband, the defendant in the court below. The husband, by way of defense, offered in evidence, in the support proceeding a certified copy of a decree of absolute divorce, granted him on October 10, 1935 by the Circuit Court of Baltimore County, Maryland, on the ground of his wife's desertion. The court below, although it filed no opinion in this case, ruled the Maryland dec

557 So.2d 486 (1990) James DYCUS, Jimmy Dycus, Roger Dycus, a Minor, Tommy Dycus, Charley Allen, and Allen Ford, and all Persons Unknown to the Appellants Having or Claiming any Legal or Equitable Interest in the Subject Land v. Lena R. SILLERS, Mary S. Skinner, Evelyn S. Pearson, Lilian S. Holleman, John L. Pearson, Evelyn P. Weems, Vernon W. Holleman, Jr., Florence H. Schoenfeld, Alice K. Jones, and Merigold Hunting Club, Inc., a Mississippi Co