Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Howard P. Smoller”
In Re Marriage of Smollerpublic domain
578 N.E.2d 256 (1991) 218 Ill. App.3d 340 161 Ill.Dec. 129 In re MARRIAGE OF Gerald J. SMOLLER, Petitioner-Appellant, and Olivia Smoller, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 1-89-0877, 1-89-1294. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. August 12, 1991. *257 Beerman, Swerdlove
Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.public domain
649 F.3d 975 (2011) Larry MONTZ; Daena Smoller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Craig Piligian; Jason Conrad Hawes; Universal Television Networks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-56954. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2010. Filed May 4, 2011.
Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.public domain
606 F.3d 1153 (2010) Larry MONTZ; Daena Smoller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Craig Piligian; Jason Conrad Hawes; Universal Television Networks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-56954. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 2010. Filed June 3, 2010.
Sampson v. D.C. Department of Correctionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge Plaintiff Walter Sampson, a corrections officer employed by the defendant District of Columbia Department of Corrections (“DOC”), filed a one-count amended complaint against the DOC alleging disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 (“ADA
People v. Del Guidicepublic domain
Raymond E. Aldrich, Jr., J. Pursuant to the provisions of GPL 330.20, the Commissioner of Mental Hygiene applies for the discharge or release on condition without danger to himself or others of the defendant John Del Guidice, who is now a patient at the Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Center, New Hampton, New York. An adequate appreciation of the reasons for the decision of this court requires a background recitation of
Dawson v. Pension Plan for the Office Employees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workerspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge. The instant lawsuit arises from a dispute over disability benefits. Plaintiff Vickie Dawson commenced this action to recover disability benefits from defendants Pension Plan for the Office Employees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (the Plan) and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), pursuan
Park House Partners, Ltd. v. DeIrazabalpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Murphy, P. J. This action seeking a declaration that the defendant tenant *85has not resided primarily at the subject rent-stabilized premises and is, therefore, not entitled to a renewal lease, was commenced by plaintiff landlord after only five months of the tenant’s recently renewed lease had elapsed. Although the tenant was
Roland G. Tarr v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administrationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Roland G. Tarr v. Case No. 17-cv-731-PB Opinion No. 2019 DNH 032 Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration O R D E R Roland G. Tarr seeks review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3), of the Acting Commissioner’s decision that denied his a
Miller v. United Statespublic domain
308 F.Supp.2d 604 (2004) Jason G. MILLER v. UNITED STATES of America No. CIV. S-01-597. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 18, 2004. *605 *606 Thomas Jay Althauser, Eccleston and Wolf PC, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Larry D. Adams, Paul Edwin Soeffing, Stephen M. Schenni
Goetz v. Crossonpublic domain
769 F.Supp. 132 (1991) Lyle R. GOETZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Mark Cans and Anna Selletti, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. The Honorable Matthew CROSSON, in his official capacity of chief administrator of the courts of New York, and Dr. Richard C. Surles, in his official capacity of Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, Defendant
Earls v. Earlspublic domain
42 S.W.3d 877 (2000) Clark Matthew EARLS v. Shirley Ann EARLS. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. May 31, 2000. Opinion Denying Petition for Rehearing June 20, 2000. Permission to Appeal Denied March 12, 2001. *879 Thomas F. Bloom and Robyn Ryan, Nashville, TN, for appellant, Clark Matthew Earls.