Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1195 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1196 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

Ellington, J. ¶1 This case involves a challenge to a finding of contempt for violation of a temporary restraining order. Howard Todd maintains he could not have intentionally disobeyed the order because he had not read it. He also contends the order did not comply with Civil Rule (CR) 65 and therefore violated due process, rendering it void. Todd was properly served with the order, however, and knowledge of its contents is imput

AMENDED1 ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISGORGEMENT OF FEES Catherine Peek McEwen, United States Bankruptcy Judge Noncomplianee with the Bankruptcy Code’s requirements concerning an estate professional’s compensation generally merits denial of compensation plus disgorgement of all of compensation already received. However, under the case-by-case approach adopted by the Court here, an ex

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Tanya Anusie-Howard sued William Todd, Michael Baker, Michael Eppig, Anthony Lee, and the Baltimore County Board of Education (collectively the “defendants”) for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”).1 Pending are Anusie-Howard’s motion to strike and the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 16, 2008 Session IN RE ESTATE OF LUCILLE RAY HEIRS OF HOWARD RAY v. MAGDALENE LONG AND JOSHUA (“JOSH”) TODD CREWS An Appeal from the Chancery Court for Wayne County No. 11378 Robert L. Jones, Chancellor No. M20

[Cite as Todd v. Todd, 2023-Ohio-3677.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY LINDSAY DYANN TODD, : Appellee, : CASE NOS. CA2022-12-115 CA2023-03-024 : - vs -

549 S.E.2d 116 (2001) 274 Ga. 98 TODD v. The STATE. No. S01A0435. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 16, 2001. *118 Wayne S. Melnick, Steven E. Phillips, Atlanta, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, C. Michael Quinn, Asst. Dist. Attys., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Pau

McLeese, Associate Judge: Petitioner Howard University Hospital (HUH) challenges an award of workers' compensation to intervenor James M. Lyles, Jr. We vacate and remand for further proceedings. I. Mr. Lyles worked for HUH as a radiological technician. In 2013, he felt pain in his right shoulder while lifting a patient to

MEMORANDUM ** The district court correctly concluded that Howard’s claim is barred by limitations. *919California law provides that a cause of action accrues “when the cause of action is complete with all of its elements.” Norgart v. Upjohn Co., 21 Cal.4th 383, 87 Cal.Rptr. 2d 453, 981 P.2d 79, 83 (1999). Accrual may be d

PER CURIAM. Todd Howard appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Appellant filed his motion pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). The trial court correctly concluded that appellant failed to timely file the motion with respect to the rule 3.850 issues. However, appellant timely raised four issues under the provisions of rule 3.800(a). As to those issues, we find no m

SMITH, Judge. Kimberly M. Todd appeals an order suspending her driver’s license under the administrative suspension and revocation provisions of Chapter 302, RSMo 1994. This appeal concerns the admissibility of test results showing the blood-alcohol concentration in Ms. Todd’s blood sample to be above the legal limit. We affirm. Background During the early morning hours of A

767 A.2d 926 (2001) 137 Md. App. 99 HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, v. Joseph Albert CONNOLLEY, et al. No. 74, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 2, 2001. *928 F. Todd Taylor, Jr., Senior Assistant County Solicitor (Barbara M. Cook, Howard County Solicitor, on the brief), Ellicott City,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 681 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 682 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N

EYLER, Judge. On August 21, 1997, appellants, Howard County Police Officers Association, Inc. and police officers Glenn M. Weir and Jerry B. Schlossnagle, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The suit was filed against appellees, Howard County, Maryland and James N. Robey, Chief of the Howard County Police Department, and sought a declaration that Howard County Police Department Ge

799 N.E.2d 1004 (2003) 343 Ill. App.3d 1201 279 Ill.Dec. 201 In re Petition of Inara M. HOWARD on behalf of Devin K. BAILEY, a Minor (Inara M. Howard, on Behalf of Devin K. Bailey, a Minor, Petitioner-Appellee, and Robert Jon Bailey, Respondent-Appellant). No. 2-02-1109. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 5, 2003.

969 S.W.2d 700 (1998) COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Transportation Cabinet, Amicus Curiae, Appellants, v. Myren E. HOWARD, Appellee. Heard With, Gregory VAUGHN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. Nos. 97-SC-764-TG, 98-SC-06-TG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. June 18, 1998. *701 A.B.

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. *296OPINION JUSTICE DONOHUE The Peer Review Protection Act, 63 P.S. §§ 425.1 - 425.4 ("PRPA"), provides a narrow evidentiary privilege to protect the "proceedings and documents of a review committee" conducting peer revi

M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge 11 Michael Todd appeals the revocation of his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS) in six cases. 1 He contends that the petition to revoke should have been dismissed and that there were errors in sentencing. We affirm. In early 2009,

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiffs David Germain (“Germain”), Selim Zherka (“Zherka”), Lexington Capi*514tal Associates, LLC (“Lexington Capital”), Silas Investments, LLC (“Silas Investments”), and the Zherka Family Irrevocable Trust (the “Zherka Trust”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant Amended Co

709 A.2d 125 (1998) 349 Md. 469 Sandra K. MARTIN v. HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland. No. 13, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 13, 1998. *126 Debra Gardner, Legal Aid Bureau, Inc., Frederick, for petitioner. F. Todd Taylor, Jr., Senior Asst. County Solicitor (Barbara M. Cook, Howard County