⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Houser v. Kohl's, Inc.”

District Court, D. Delaware · 1990-10-22 · Published · cited 19× · 748 F. Supp. 247; 18 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1773; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14146
748 F.Supp. 247 (1990) STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE, mbH as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung, Plaintiff, v. HERCULES, INC., Himont U.S.A., Inc., Himont, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-566-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 22, 1990. *248 Howard M. Handelman, of Bayard Handelman & Mur
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016-01-21 · Published · cited 12× · 2016 ME 17; 131 A.3d 903; 2016 Me. LEXIS 17
HUMPHREY, J. [¶ 1] This appeal, another in a line of foreclosure cases in which the purported mortgagee lacks standing, presents us with challenges to the trial court’s initial judgment of dismissal with prejudice and its authority, pending this appeal, to change that outcome to a dismissal without prejudice. We conclude that the court reached a result that is correct but erred
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001-09-26 · Published · cited 5× · 32 P.3d 929; 176 Or. App. 603; 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1411
32 P.3d 929 (2001) 176 Or. App. 603 CONIFER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Stephen T. HAYWORTH and Tamara A. Hayworth, Respondents. C990122CV; A110100 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 16, 2001. Decided September 26, 2001. *930 Fred C. Nachtigal, Hill
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010-06-22 · Published · cited 56× · 233 P.3d 1169; 224 Ariz. 590; 585 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13; 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 105
233 P.3d 1169 (2010) COUNTY OF LA PAZ, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. YAKIMA COMPOST COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation; Yakima Company, Inc., a Washington corporation; Defendants/Counterclaimants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Lincoln General Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 08-0759. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, D
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2022-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1552 Filed March 30, 2022 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ALISA DANAE SUNDBY AND TAYLOR RAY SUNDBY Upon the Petition of ALISA DANAE SUNDBY, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning TAYLOR RAY SUNDBY, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marion County, Robert B. Hanson, Judge.
California Supreme Court · 1989-03-30 · Published · cited 258× · 770 P.2d 704; 48 Cal. 3d 395; 257 Cal. Rptr. 292; 1989 Cal. LEXIS 1101
48 Cal.3d 395 (1989) 770 P.2d 704 257 Cal. Rptr. 292 JACK I. GARVEY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S.F. 25060. Supreme Court of California. March 30, 1989. *398 COUNSEL Rogers, Joseph, O'Donnell
In RE MacFARLANDpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011-11-14 · Published · cited 8× · 462 B.R. 857
462 B.R. 857 (2011) In re Norris & Judy Carol MacFARLAND, Debtors. In re Onelia Hurtado, Debtor. In re Gabriel F. & Madelyn Garcia, Debtors. In re Keith & Nancy Ahringer, Debtors. In re Lisa Marie Mullennix, Debtor. In re Maria T. Alvarez, Debtor. In re Carole V. Kirkland, Debtor. In re Eliezer & Rosa M. Santana, Debtors. In re Andrea Olevia Beckford, Debtor. In re Hector De Pena, Debtor. In re Patr
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
California Court of Appeal · 1928-10-27 · Published · cited 6× · 271 P. 525; 94 Cal. App. 533; 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 616
Broadly stated, the underlying and outstanding facts appertaining to the litigation upon which the appeal herein is predicated are as follows: The Citrus Belt Land Company, a corporation with an authorized capital stock of $250,000, was the owner of a tract of land approximating 5,000 acres which it proposed to improve, subdivide, and sell. In attempting to carry out such program the corporation became financially involved to the extent of about $293,000 in unpaid and overdue debts — th