Cases

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant Household Retail Services, Inc. (“HRSI” or “Household”), appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs Echo Acceptance Corporation and Echo-sphere Corporation (collectively, “Echo”) on Echo’s breach of contract claim. The district court’s jurisdiction was based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and w

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. a/a/o EDWIN MASABANDA and MILENA MASABANDA, Appellant, v. AMERICAN INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-89 [March 23, 2022] Appeal from the County Court for the N

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE Mark Geran appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Xerox Education Services, Inc. (XES), a loan servicer, in his suit for damages for violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The judgment is affirmed. Factual and Procedural Background

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DAN AARON POLSTER, District Judge. Before the Court are the following: (1) Defendant Manley Deas Kochalski LLC’s (“MDK”)1 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (Doc. # 51), (2), Defendants Lender Processing Services, Inc., LPS Default Solutions, Inc., and DocX LLC’s (collectively, “LPS”)2

HUNTER, Judge, dissenting. Because I disagree with the majority’s position that the trial court erred in finding the arbitration agreement to be unconscionable, I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion does not include numerous and detailed findings of fact made by the trial court, most of which are uncontroverted. Because the findings are necessary for a full understanding of the issue

503 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2007) Emily COOPER, individually and as representative of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff. v. QC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. CV 06-010-TUC-FRZ. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 30, 2007. *1267 *1268 Gary Frank Urman, Deconcini McDonald Y

810 A.2d 643 (2002) Robert E. LYTLE and Judith Lytle, Appellants, v. CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., f/k/a Commercial Credit Plan Consumer Discount Company, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 27, 2001. Filed October 24, 2002. *645 Robert M. Firkser, Media, for appellant. Marilyn Heffley, Philadelphia,

236 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2002) Joseph LUNA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III, et al., Defendants. No. C02-1635L. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 4, 2002. *1167 *1168 *1169

264 S.W.3d 292 (2008) SECURITY SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellant v. Eric C. SANDERS, Carrie Sanders, and Eric M. Sanders, Appellees. In re Security Service Federal Credit Union. Nos. 04-07-00540-CV, 04-07-00625-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 14, 2008. *295 Melodee L. Gruber, Richard G. Garza, Jackson Wa

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RUBY WAGNER, on behalf of herself ) and all other similarly situated ) stockholders of BRP GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0150-JTL ) BRP GROUP, INC., )

EXPLANATION AND ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Plaintiff Coleman McCall, Jr. brings this putative class action against Drive Financial Services, L.P. and Drive G.P., LLC (collectively, “Drive”). McCall alleges that Drive violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”) by having their collection department send out collection notices with fals

[Cite as Oakes v. Oakes & Leadwise, Inc., 2024-Ohio-6051.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERY B. OAKES : : Appellant/Cross-Appellee : C.A. No. 30023 : v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Christopher Taylor filed suit alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). Plaintiff alleges that IDC Technologies, Inc. (“IDC”) rescinded his job offer after reviewing a background check prepared by Defendant Fi

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE VAXART, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2020-0767-PAF MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 4, 2022 Date Decided: June 3, 2022 Stephen E. Jenkins, F. Troupe Mickler, IV, ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware;

USCA11 Case: 22-10575 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 07/07/2023 Page: 1 of 92 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10575 ____________________ GEORGE TERSHAKOVEC, D

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BGC PARTNERS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2018-0722-LWW MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 13, 2022 Date Decided: August 19, 2022 Christine M. Mackintosh, Michael D. Bell, and Vivek Upadhya, GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo and Andrew E. Blumberg, BERNSTEIN LITO

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-221V (To be Published) ************************* SCOTT SCHARFENBERGER, * * Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, * * Dated: May 15, 2015 v.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § No. 181, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 12711

140 Ariz. 156 (1983) 680 P.2d 1217 In re the MARRIAGE OF Jacquelyn Michelson BERGER, Petitioner-Appellant, Cross Appellee, and Michael David Berger, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. Jacquelyn Michelson BERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Michael David BERGER and Teresi-Berger Custom Home Builders, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants. No. 1 CA-CIV 5859.

Case: 19-1633 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 08/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COMMUNITY HEALTH CHOICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2019-1633 _____________