Cases

426 S.W.2d 814 (1968) 244 Ark. 718 A. F. HOUSE, Trustee, Appellant, v. James R. LONG et al., Appellees. No. 5-4258. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 22, 1968. *815 Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, by Isaac A. Scott, Jr., Little Rock, for appellant. Catlett & Henderson, and Robinson, Thornton, McC

Long Trail House Condo. Ass’n v. Engelberth Constr., Inc., No. 581-11-08 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Sept. 1, 2011) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CI

[Cite as Cunning v. Windsor House, Inc., 2023-Ohio-352.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY PATRICK P. CUNNING, ESQ., CASE NOS. 2022-T-0021 2022-T-0050 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeals from the - vs -

Kupersmith, Supr. J., ¶ 36. Specially Assigned, dissenting. Oliver Wendell Holmes famously observed that it was “revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law” than its ancient lineage and worse still “if the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished . . . and the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past.” 0. Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 469 (1897). The privity requirement

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-07562-7, Linda Lau, J., entered November 9, 1999. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Coleman and Cox, JJ.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

CORNELIA T.L. PILLARD, United States Court of Appeals Judge, COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY and RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judges *111Plaintiffs have a bold theory. For more than two centuries, our nation has been operating under the following upper and lower bounds on the number of seats Congress may constitutionally authorize in the House of Representatives: "T

In an action to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, assault and battery, and fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), entered June 1, 2012, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Long Island Housing Services, Inc., Maria T. DeGennaro, Michelle Santantonio, Myrsa Bonet, and Carrie Roman which was pursu

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Defendants Bright House Networks, LLC (“BHN”) and Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”).1 (C.A. No. 16-693 D.I. 20; C.A. No. 16-695 D.I. 19)2 For the reasons below, the Court will grant both motions.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William A. Long brought this action against Defendants the District of Columbia Housing A

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge: The dispositive issue in this wage-and-hour case is whether Plaintiff, a delivery person for a local family-owned Chinese restaurant, was an employee covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiff was not a covered employee, and

2007 OK 57 FRANKLIN HOUSE, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. THE TOWN OF DICKSON, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Appellant. No. 102721. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 3, 2007. David Pyle, Dennis R. Morris, David O. Blankship, Ardmore, Oklahoma, plaintiff/ appellee. S. Brent Bahner, Julie J. Austin, Fischl, Culp, McMill

688 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2010) Charles CORLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LONG-LEWIS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-01812-HGD. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 28, 2010. *1316 G. Patterson Keahey, Jr., Tracey C. Dotson, Law Offices of G. Patterson Keahey PC, James Arthur Butts, John D. Sa

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/21/2017 09:08 AM CDT - 595 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 24 Nebraska A ppellate R eports HOUSE v. HOUSE Cite as 24 Neb. App. 595 Douglas Hou

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 565 U.S. 874, 132 S. Ct. 232, 181 L. Ed. 2d 130, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6569.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

J-A10020-22 2022 PA Super 129 MONICA L. LONG : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER A. LONG : : Appellant

2023 IL App (4th) 220891 FILED NO. 4-22-0891 November 13, 2023 Carla Bender IN THE APPELLATE COURT 4th District Appellate

OPINION SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice. This is a libel suit brought by a church against a publisher and two authors after the church was included in a book about “religious cults,” as that term is defined in the book. The publisher and authors moved for summary judgment, which the trial court denied. This interlocutory appeal followed. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(b) (Ve

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.