⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Hord v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.”

District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016-06-28 · Published · cited 30× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 832; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83526; 2016 WL 3522321
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE DAVID M. LAWSON, United States Distinct Judge Plaintiffs Cosme and Shirleann Cruz filed this action alleging that defendant Capital One, N.A. wrongfully foreclosed the mortgage on their family home to enforce collection of a delinquent promissory note. They identified six causes of action in their complaint. The defendant,
North Carolina Business Court · 2009-03-13 · Published · cited 5× · 2009 NCBC 4
JDH Capital, LLC v. Flowers, 2009 NCBC 4. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 07 CVS 5354 JDH CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR REBECCA D. FLOWERS, DWF
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 351
JOHN J. McCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge. Intrigued at the prospect of becoming involved in long line fishing in the unfished waters surrounding Saipan, Cheri Becker, Allen Hartley, and Rachel Hartley invested millions of dollars to bolster the Zietzke brothers, Courtney and Rockford ("Rocky"), and their companies USA Island Seafood, Inc. and Saipan USA Fisheries,
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015-12-15 · Published · cited 6× · 780 S.E.2d 873; 244 N.C. App. 358; 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 1045; 2015 WL 8731973
DAVIS, Judge. *359 This case involves a dispute regarding the entitlement of Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ("BOA") to enforce novations to three promissory notes executed by Defendant Christopher Harvey Rice ("Rice"). 1 BOA appeal
Indiana Supreme Court · 1901-10-08 · Published · cited 1× · 157 Ind. 623; 61 N.E. 575; 1901 Ind. LEXIS 202
Jordan, J. On December 29, 1897, the Eirst National Bank of Chicago, as plaintiff below, instituted this action. Afterwards on December 31, 1897, an amended or supplemental complaint was filed setting out the execution of two chattel mortgages, each executed by the Krag-Reynolds Company, a corporation doing business at the city of Indianapolis. The first of these mortgages was dated December 21, 1897, and was executed to one Laf
Indiana Supreme Court · 1877-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 57 Ind. 198
Howe, J. The appellant, as plaintiff, sued the appellees, as defendants, in the court below. Each of the appellees demurred separately to the appellant’s complaint, for the want of sufficient facts therein to constitute a cause of action.; each of which demurrers was sustained by the court below, and to these decisions the appellant excepted. And thereupon judgment was rendered by the court below, upon said d
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-04-19 · Published · cited 33× · 784 S.E.2d 650; 247 N.C. App. 104; 2016 WL 1569204; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 432
TYSON, Judge. *104 Defendants Choate Construction Company and Choate Construction Group, LLC (collectively, "Choate") appeal from order denying Choate's motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for change of venue pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3). We affirm. I. Factual Backgr
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-08-13 · Published · cited 14× · 321 F. Supp. 3d 76
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge On November 20, 2017, Plaintiff Institute for Truth in Marketing, Inc. ("IFTIM"), a nonprofit organization that promotes truthful product labeling and advertising, filed the instant action against Defendant Total Health Network Corp. ("Total Health"), a vitamin and dietary supplement seller, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (See Am. Compl., ECF No. 1-2.)<
North Carolina Business Court · 2023-01-17 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 NCBC 3
McGriff Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Hudson, 2023 NCBC 3. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FORSYTH COUNTY 22 CVS 680 MCGRIFF INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ORDER AND OPINION ON Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014-06-02 · Published · cited 9× · 24 F. Supp. 3d 1142; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74392; 2014 WL 2462883
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Allie Stewart claims that she was the victim of unlawful debt collection *1146practices. When she defended against a debt collection action in state court brought by Bureaus Investment Group # 1, LLC, she discovered that Bureaus Investment Group # 1, LLC lacked aut
North Carolina Business Court · 2019-12-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NCBC 80
Albright v. Vining-Sparks Secs., Inc., 2019 NCBC 80. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 18 CVS 18223 CURT ALBRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ 12(b) AND 12(c) VINING-SPARKS SECURITIES,
Kremen v. Cohenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-07-25 · Published · cited 123× · 337 F.3d 1024; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6565; 67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1502; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 8245; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14830; 2003 WL 21715318
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. We decide whether Network Solutions may be liable for giving away a registrant’s domain name on the basis of a forged letter. Background “Sex on the Internet?,” they all said. “That’ 11 never make any money.” But computer-geek-turned-entrepreneur Gary Kremen knew an opportunity when he saw it. The year was 1994; domain names were free for the asking, an
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
WR-83,719-01 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 8/11/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK Appendix 1 THE STATE OF TEXAS § DOCKET# II d..F1 £- 177 § COUNTY OF MCLENNAN § COURT: JP COURT PRECINCT 1 PLACE 2 COMPLAINT {Articles 15.04 & 15.05, Texas Code of Criminal
Piazza v. Kirkbridepublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019-05-10 · Published · cited 20× · 827 S.E.2d 479; 372 N.C. 137
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 181A16 Filed 10 May 2019 LAWRENCE PIAZZA and SALVATORE LAMPURI v. DAVID KIRKBRIDE, GREGORY BRANNON, and ROBERT RICE Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 246 N.C. App. 576, 785 S.E.2d 695 (2016), affirming a judgment entered on 13 March 2014 and an order entered on 11 April 2014, b
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-08-21 · Published · cited 1×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0330p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JEROME R. MIKULSKI; ELZETTA C. MI
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2012-03-08 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00074-CV DENNIS L. MIGA APPELLANT V. RONALD L. JENSEN APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ----------
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998-01-13 · Published · cited 8× · 132 F.3d 1017; 1997 WL 793312
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge MAGILL wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge WILLIAMS joined. OPINION MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge: Banca Cremi, S.A., Institución de Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero Cremi and Banca Cremi Grand Cayman (together, the Bank) purchased a number of collateralized mortgage o
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979-04-09 · Published · cited 10× · 82 F.R.D. 168; 27 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 351; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13175
OPINION LUONGO, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this securities fraud case are investors who purchased Magic Marker Corporation common stock during a period of alleged price manipulation. In their second consolidated amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that over a period of nearly two years, some forty individual and corporate defendants took part in a wide-ranging conspiracy to artificially inflate the pr
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015-05-20 · Published · cited 78× · 124 A.3d 1025; 2015 WL 2415559; 2015 Del. Ch. LEXIS 140
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Anthony Pacchia (the “Lead Plaintiff’) and his attorneys (“Lead Counsel”) challenged a transaction in which Vivendi S.A. divested its controlling equity position in Activision Blizzard,. Inc. (“Activision” or the “Company”). The transaction restructured Activision’s governance profile and stockholder base, so this decisio