Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hopper v. Bender”
Matthew Paul Bender v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00342-CR MATTHEW PAUL BENDER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
Matthew Paul Bender v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00342-CR MATTHEW PAUL BENDER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
McClure v. Hopperpublic domain
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: In this tax refund suit the question for decision is the validity of a claimed loss deduction growing out of the sale and repurchase by taxpayer to a bank of a large amount of unrated municipal bonds. Plaintiffs David M. Fender, Trust No. 1, Harris R. Fender, Jr., Trust No. 1, and co-trustees Harris R. Fender and Thomas Sharp, brought this suit1 seeking a refund of 196
Bender v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.public domain
901 F.Supp. 863 (1994) Sandra BENDER, Plaintiff, v. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO., INC., Richard Carlin, John Maine and Ronald Reisman, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-5493 (JBS). United States District Court, New Jersey. October 27, 1994. *864 *865 Sandra Bender, Cherry Hill, NJ, Plaintiff
Sterling H. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. Benderpublic domain
520 P.2d 860 (1974) 95 Idaho 813 STERLING H. NELSON & SONS, INC., a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John BENDER, Commissioner of Law Enforcement of the State of Idaho, and L. Clark Hand, Supervisor of the Idaho State Police, Defendants, and John G. Fanning et al., Intervenors-Appellants. STERLING H. NELSON & SONS, INC., a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John BENDER, Commi
Bender-Miller Co. v. Thomwood Farms, Inc.public domain
211 Va. 585 (1971) BENDER-MILLER COMPANY, INC. v. THOMWOOD FARMS, INC., ET AL. Record No. 7362. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 8, 1971. Present, All the Justices. 1. Supplier agreed to furnish "best" workmanship and materials and to repair or replace as directed by architect. When heating-cooling system did not function, all concerned inspected and confer
People v. Hopperpublic domain
145 Cal.App.2d 180 (1956) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KENNETH E. HOPPER, Appellant. Crim. No. 2671. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. Oct. 18, 1956. Robert C. Bienvenu and Leo J. Biegenzahn for Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and G. A. Strader, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. VAN DYKE, P. J. This is an appeal
Lutz v. Benderpublic domain
340 Ill. App. 120 (1950) 91 N.E.2d 459 Charles R. Lutz and Nancy G. Lutz, Appellees, v. Irene Bender and Herman Fidler, Trading as Rene Apartments, Appellants. Gen. No. 44,920. Illinois Appellate Court. Opinion filed March 8, 1950. Released for publication April 3, 1950. *121
Green v. Hopperpublic domain
This suit was brought by the appellants, Ella B. Green, joined by her husband, T. H. Green, in trespass to try title and to cancel a certain deed executed by Ella B. Green and her said husband to appellee, Hopper, conveying to Hopper certain premises situated in Stonewall county, Tex. The ground upon which the cancellation was sought was that said property was the separate property of the said Ella B. Green, and was also her homestead, and that the execution of said deed was procured by dures
Fuller & Johnson Manuf'g Co. v. Benderpublic domain
CONE, District Judge. The first claim of letters patent, No. 423,-200, granted March 11, 1890, to C. G-. Alward for improvements in transplanting machines, is alone involved. It is as follows: “(1) A transplanting-machine comprising a frame mounted on carryingwlieels, a ground-opener connected to said frame, a fertilizer-hopper having its discharge-spout in the line of travel of the ground-opener, a
OPINION OF THE COURT Dennis F. Bender, J. This is a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. The defendant *984property owners are in default, and the plaintiff seeks an order of reference to compute. In addition, however, the plaintiff asks the court to direct that the referee “make a determination if the Mortgage that was
Commonwealth v. Maldonodopublic domain
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: The Commonwealth appeals from the March 25, 2015 order precluding it from ■introducing at trial two jail call recordings in which Appellee, speaking Spanish, allegedly made inculpatory statements. This sanction .was imposed because the Commonwealth ostensibly failed to comply with an earlier order to provide Spanish-to-English transcri
Harrison v. Owen Steel Co.public domain
GEATHERS, J.: **134Robert Harrison, an employee of Owen Steel Company, appeals the decision of the Appellate Panel of the Workers' Compensation Commission (Appellate Panel) denying his claim for compensation for injuries sustained from an admitted workplace accident occurring on September 17, 2008. Harrison argues the Appellate Panel erred in f
People v. Heilpublic domain
*216OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph L. Latwin, J. This case involves consumption of alcohol by our youth. The impact of alcohol abuse on the lives of our young people can be seen in traffic fatalities, increased crime, decreased productivity, and countless other alcohol-related problems. This issue is not new to Rye. (See e.g. People v Houis, 196
Thomas v. Hernandezpublic domain
740 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2010) John Paul THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Robert HERNANDEZ, Board of Prison Terms Unknown Deputy Commissioner, Defendants. Civil No. 07-1141-WVG. United States District Court, S.D. California. September 13, 2010. *1176 John Paul Thomas, Lincoln, NE, pro se. Attorney General, State of California Office of th
Murphy v. City of Tulsapublic domain
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the defendant City of Tulsa's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 175]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted. I. Background On September 12, 1994, Travis Wood, the three-month-old son of Michelle Murphy, was found dead as a result of a stab wound to the chest and incised wound to the neck. The T
McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc.public domain
ORDER: 1) DENYING MOTION REMAND 2) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 3) REMANDING THIS ACTION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Michael McGrath’s (“Plaintiff’) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendants Home Depot USA, Inc., Jim Hopper, Armando Peralta, and Bria
Miller v. Brownpublic domain
394 F.Supp.2d 794 (2005) Larry MILLER, and 11th Senatorial District Republican Committee, Plaintiffs, v. Michael BROWN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, Barbara Hildenbrand, in her official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections, and Jean R. Jensen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3
SICILIA v. Boeing Co.public domain
775 F.Supp.2d 1243 (2011) Joseph SICILIA, Plaintiff, v. The BOEING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. C09-710-RSM. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. January 25, 2011. Order Denying Reconsideration February 14, 2011. *1245 Rebecca Jane Roe, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender, Seattle, WA,
Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. King Countypublic domain
771 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2011) SEATTLE MIDEAST AWARENESS CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY, Defendant. No. C11-94RAJ. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. February 18, 2011. *1268 Jeffrey C. Grant, Skellenger Bender, PS, Lindsey Sarah Soffes, Sarah A. Dunne, ACLU of Washington, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff. <