Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00126-CV ___________________________ SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, LLC, Appellant V. ANGIE SPARKS AND LARRY SPARKS, Appellees On Appeal from the 236th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 236-322296-20 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinio

11/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BETTY SPARKS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 35CC1-2020-CR-28 J. Weber McCraw, Judge _______________

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–0964 Submitted March 26, 2025—Filed May 23, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Hope Jennifer Clark, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des M

Case: 18-50225 Document: 00515173123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED N

68 So.3d 435 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas SPARKS, Jr. a/k/a Abdullah Hakim El-Mumit. No. 1988-KA-0017. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 11, 2011. Rehearing Denied September 2, 2011. *448 Stephen Baima Ingersoll, Capital Appeals Project, New Orleans, LA, Sarah Lynn Ottinger, Robert J. Smith, Abdullah Hakim E

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellants Alan Robert Johnson and Jennifer A. Sparks’s day did not start well for them. They left their cell phone at a Walmart store. But this wasn’t just any cell phone; Johnson and Sparks’s phone stored hundreds of images and videos of child pornography that they had made using Sparks’s friend’s four-year-old child — and Johnson was already a registered sex offender. So Defendants mu

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00029-CV DARLENE SPARKS, Appellant V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca

Greaney, J. A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant on two indictments charging murder, finding in each case that he had acted with deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty, and was guilty of felony-murder (with armed robbery as the predicate felony). Represented by new counsel on appeal, the defendant argues error in (1) the denial of his motion to suppress his statements to the police and photograph

91 Md. App. 35 (1992) 603 A.2d 1258 MARK EDWARD SPARKS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 788, September Term, 1991. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 6, 1992. Jennifer P. Lyman, Assigned Public Defender, Washington, D.C. (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellant. Kathryn Grill Graeff, Asst. Atty. Ge

*484BROCK and FONES, Justices, dissenting. We respectfully dissent. On July 8, 1983, at about 3:00 p.m., Robert Boddie, a driver for Athens Distributing Company, a wholesale liquor dealer, was shot three times and killed while making a delivery at Daddy’s Liquor Store on Glass Street in Chattanooga. A clerk at the liquor store saw Boddi

147 B.R. 407 (1992) In re Marcus Lee ADAMS, Debtor. Todd SPARKS, Plaintiff, v. Marcus Lee ADAMS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-82000, Adv. No. 91-8501. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. November 4, 1992. *408 Lawrence P. Nolan, for plaintiff. David S. Feinberg, for defendant. OPINION REGARDI

298 S.E.2d 857 (1982) STATE of West Virginia v. Hobert SPARKS. No. 15519. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. December 15, 1982. *859 Janet F. Steele, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellee. William E. Kiger, Parkersburg, for appellant. PER CURIAM: Hobert Sparks appeals from his conviction by a jur

Under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree and the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of thirty years. He was represented by court appointed counsel and at arraignment pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. After sentence was imposed he gave notice of appeal and was furnished a free transcript. Trial counsel was appointed to represent appellant on this appeal.</

[1] OPINION [2] Appellant, Maurice Sparks, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County, for the offense of Robbery With Firearms. His punishment was fixed at twenty (20) years imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court. [3] At the trial, Leo Scruggs, Jr., testified that he was seventeen years old and that, on October 24, 1971, he was with

262 Cal.App.2d 597 (1968) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD E. SPARKS et al., Defendants and Appellants. Crim. No. 6414. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. May 29, 1968. Robert H. Frank, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Robert R. Granucci and Karl S.

310 S.W.2d 45 (1958) Mack COLLINS, Appellant, v. Robert Lavon SPARKS, by His Next Friend, Ivan Sparks, Appellee. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 7, 1958. *46 Duff Arnett, Hazard, Emmett G. Fields, Whitesburg, for appellant. Stephen Combs, Jr., Whitesburg, F. Byrd Hogg, Whitesburg, for appellee. MONTGOMERY, Judge. Rober

82 Cal.App.2d 145 (1947) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GEORGE SPARKS, Appellant. Crim. No. 4140. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. Oct. 30, 1947. Marshall A. Stutsman for Appellant. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and John F. Hassler, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. WHITE, J. In an information filed by the Distr

This action was brought by appellant to impress a trust for the benefit of himself and others in class with him, upon funds which had been collected by appellee milling company from appellant and others in his class, to use in paying its processing taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, but which funds were not, and cannot now be used for that purpose, because the act was declared unconstitutional, and to obtain an accounting of the funds thus collected and distributed to appellant and

SAM SPARKS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically WC 1899 McKinney Avenue, LLC, World Class Capital Group, LLC, and Natin and Sheena Paul (collectively, World Class)'s Motion for Summary Judgment [#79], STK Dallas, LLC and The One Group Hospitality, Inc. (collectively, STK)'s Response [#82] in opposition, and World Class's Reply [#92]

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Jonathan Whitted and the City of Austin’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Rule 7(a) Reply and Rule 12(e) More Definite- Statement [# 7], Plaintiff John Stephens Schaefer’s Response thereto [# 12], Defendants’ Reply in support [# 13], Pl