Cases

176 F.3d 492 Hoodv.Sutton NO. 97-6541 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. March 08, 1999 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. , No.96-01644-CV-N-M 2 Affirmed.

ORDER Jami Naturalite, also known as Daniel James Miskowski, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court *402judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that

[Cite as State v. Sutton, 2022-Ohio-2452.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-21-11 v. JERON D. SUTTON, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Seneca County Common Pleas Court

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2020 IL App (5th) 190338 NOTICE Decision filed 12/16/20. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-19-0338 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ LARRY L. HO

GARY W. LYNCH, P.J. Raymond Spencer Hood (“Defendant”) appeals his convictions for five counts of statutory rape in the first degree, one count of statutory sodomy in the second degree and one count of statutory rape in the second degree. See sections 566.032, 566.064, and 566.034.1 Defendant contends in four points that the trial court erred in admitting (1) “the testimony of Nancy Sutt

STROUD, Judge. Defendant appeals an order denying his motion to suppress and a judgment convicting him of felony carrying a concealed gun contending that his right “to be free from unreasonable search and seizure” was violated when a law enforcement officer frisked him without reasonable suspicion. (Original in all caps.) For the following reasons, we affirm.

OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Christopher Sutton seeks a writ of mandamus under the Mandamus and Venue Act (“MVA”) or an order under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) that would compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to (1) respond to an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and (2) rule on his 1-130 petition for his spouse’s permanen

OPINION HOOD, District Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Sutton appeals the November 26, 2003 order of the district court granting Defendants St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.’s and St. Jude Medical, Inc.’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE the district court’s order, and REMAND the case to the district court for

71 F.Supp.2d 383 (1999) Roy F. SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. Ronald W. SUTTON, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Co-Trustee Loretta E. Sutton, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-573 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 13, 1999. *384 Roy F. Sutton, Galloway Township, NJ, Plaintiff pr

Opinion issued December 4, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00776-CR JOHN KENNETH SUTTON, AppellantV.THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

OPINION MARGOLIS, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on Cross-Motions For Judgment Upon The Administrative Record, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and plaintiffs Opposition to Proceedings on Remand. Plaintiff, James G. Sutton, challenges the Army’s March 27, 2002 decision to involuntarily discharge him from active duty status. He requests reinstatement with back pay and allowances, corr

On Application for Rehearing The opinion of September 15, 2000, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Loretta M. Davenport Hood and James D. Davenport were divorced by an order of the trial court in 1982. The mother was awarded custody of the parties' two children. The father was ordered to pay alimony, child support, and postminority support. In the time since the divorce, the mother has obtained two judgments awarding her amounts for

164 A.2d 477 (1960) Evelyn S. SUTTON, Appellant, v. William C. SUTTON et al., Appellees. No. 2628. Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Argued October 5, 1960. Decided October 21, 1960. Arthus L. Willcher, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Morton Willcher, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant. John B

539 S.E.2d 227 (2000) 245 Ga. App. 881 SUTTON v. The STATE. No. A00A1762. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 13, 2000. *228 Elaine T. McGruder, Atlanta, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Christopher M. Quinn, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff in his own behalf (99) and in behalf of other taxpayers and residents of the city of Kinston to restrain the holding of an election and the issuing of bonds in the sum of $150,000 for school purposes in the Kinston Graded School District, plaintiffs contending that there is no authority for holding the election or issuing the bonds: (1) For that the election has been ordered by the aldermen of Kinston instead of by the board of commission

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0364p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, -

ACCEPTED 04-15-00097-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/29/2015 8:55:56 PM KEITH HOTTLE

181 A.2d 470 (1962) Jacqueline G. SUTTON, Appellant, v. Earline B. JONES, Appellee. No. 3028. Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Argued May 4, 1962. Decided June 4, 1962. Arthur Woods, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant. *471 John L. Laskey, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

190 A.2d 655 (1963) Leroy HAYES, Appellant, v. Irene SUTTON and Willie Sutton, Appellees. No. 3150. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 28, 1963. Decided May 3, 1963. Edward C. Donahue, Takoma Park, Md., with whom William A. Ehrmantraut and John J. Mitchell, Takoma Park, Md., were on the brief, for appellant. Joseph Zitomer,