Cases

821 So.2d 900 (2002) Fred HOOD and Andrea Hood, Appellants, v. PERRY COUNTY, Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2001-CA-00321-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. July 16, 2002. *901 William W. Abbott, Jr., Gulfport, Hugh D. Keating, Gulfport, Attorney for Appellants. Michael Clayton Barefield, Jackson, Attorney for Appellee.

JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH delivered the opinion of the court: In September 2008, defendant, Richard L. Hood, filed a pro se pleading entitled “habeas corpus petition.” Also in September 2008, the trial court dismissed defendant’s pleading after recharacterizing it as a postconviction petition. In this appeal, defendant all

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM H. BARBOUR, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motions of Plaintiff to Remand. Having considered the pleadings, the attachments thereto, as well as supporting and opposing authorities, the Court finds the Motions are not well taken and should be denied. I. Factual Background and Procedural History In June of

342 F.Supp.2d 1111 (2004) Emma Yaiza DIAZ; Ebony Roberts; Andre Neal Bembry; American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; American Federal of State, County and Local Employees, AFL-CIO; Florida Public Employees Council 79, AFSCME, AFL-CIO; and Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs, v. Glenda HOOD, Secretary of State of Florida; Brenda Snipes, Broward County Supervisor of Elections; John Stafford, Duv

ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellants, John Hood and Ruby Hood (“appellants”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pike County in favor of respondent, George Clinton, as Trustee of the George Clinton Trust, A Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated February 16, 1994 (“respondent”). The trial court reformed and corrected the deed of conveyance executed by respondent to appellants to reflect the real intent of the

ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to remand. Docket No. 19. The defendants have responded in opposition, Docket No. 25, the plaintiff has replied, Docket No. 29, and the Court is ready to rule. The motion to remand will be granted.' Also pending is the defendants’ motion to strike portions of the plaintiffs reply brief. Docket No. 30. That m

PER CURIAM: The Attorney General of Mississippi (the “State”) filed six in parens patriae complaints in the Mississippi Chancery Court alleging six credit card companies (“Defen *82 dants”) violated the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”) by charging consumers for product

868 S.W.2d 744 (1993) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. David Clifton HOOD, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. September 22, 1993. *745 David L. Hamblen, Union City, for appellant. Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen., and Joel W. Perry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Thomas A. Thomas, Dist. Atty. Gen., Union City, for ap

*645 OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Oceanus Perry appeals his convictions and sentences for armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) & (d), and use of a firearm during a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We affirm Perry’s convictions, and his sentence for use of

Hall, Justice. Two questions are submitted for our determination : (1.) Whether a sale made by a married woman to her husband, without being allowed by the order of the sune*311rlor court of the county of her domicile, is valid, or whether such sale is void or only voidable. (2.) Whether a judgment creditor of the wife can subjec

Hall, J. 1. A sale' made by a married woman to her husband, without being allowed by the order of the Superior Court of the county of her domicile is not only voidable .but void. Code, §1785 ; Webster’s Diet., verb, invalid; 71 Ga., 692. Thomas D. Lewis; J. P, Brooke, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Dodgen; E. Faw; W. J. Winn, for defendants. 2. <

Blandford, Justice. Jamerson Perry died leaving Martha Hood, then Perry, *320and three children surviving him; he also left an estate consisting of certain lots of land. Martha, the widow, took out letters of guardianship for the property of the minors, and gave bond and security for such guardianship. She took dower in the lands, and the administrator of Jamerson Perry,

IRVING, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Mississippi Livestock Producers Association (MLPA) appeals an order of summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Copiah County in favor of Perry Hood. The following issues are assigned as error and recited verbatim from MLPA’s statement of the issues 1. THE FIRST ISSUE TO CONSIDER IS GRANTED A SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO RULE 56(A) OR DISMISSAL, PURSU

Matter of Hood v Rivera (2020 NY Slip Op 07381) Matter of Hood v Rivera 2020 NY Slip Op 07381 Decided on December 9, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

ORDER Mary Ann Hood filed a petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in June 2009. She listed “American Express” on her Schedule P as having an unsecured, nonpriority claim for “credit card debt” totaling $5,021.99. American Express Centurion Bank, a subsidiary of the American Express Company, timely filed a proof of claim for the prepetition balance of $5,021.99 on Hood’s credit-card account. Hood objected, through counsel,

686 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2010) David HANCOCK, Plaintiff, v. James HOOD, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:09-00026-KD-N. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division. February 18, 2010. *1242 Bruce Boynton, Selma, AL, for Plaintiff. Joseph Lister Hubbard, Jr., Montgomery, AL, Abigail Lounsbury Morrow, Tayl

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 328 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.07.21 12:21:33 DIVISION IV -05'00' No. CR-18-818 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: June 5, 2019 MICHAEL DAKOTA HOOD

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0945-04

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered April 2, 2015, which denied the motion of defendant Weber Farhat Realty Management Inc. to dismiss the claims against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 and, in effect, denied as moot the conditional cross motion of defendant 80th Street I LLC (sued herein as 80th Street, LLC) to convert its cross claims to third-party claims, unanimously reversed, on the la

OPINION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. The right to vote: It defines our nation as a democracy. It is the key to what Abraham Lincoln so famously extolled as a “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people.”1 The Supreme Court of the United States, placing the power of the right to vote in context, explained: “Especially since the right to ex