Cases

SEXTON, Judge Pro Tem. In this medical malpractice case, the jury found that Defendant, Willis-Knigh-ton Medical Center (“WK”), breached the standard of care in its treatment of Virginia Martin and awarded survival damages of $250,000, but no wrongful death damages or funeral expenses, following Ms. Martin’s death. WK appeals and Inter-vener, the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Board, joins in the appeal with W

646 P.2d 203 (1982) STATE of Alaska, Northern Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association, and Southern Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association, Appellants, v. Wayne ALEX, William A. Thomas, Jr., Ed Maki, John C. Martin, Warren S. Westrom, Dick Workman, Mark W. White, Carl Sims, Bruce R. Gilbert, Fred Chambers, Douglas D. Karns, Harold D. Bieleski, and Leo R. Albecker, Jr., Appellees. Nos. 5065, 5086 and 5142.

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. A recently enacted statute in New Jersey prohibits licensed counselors from engaging in “sexual orientation change efforts” 1 with a client under the age of 18. Individuals and organizations that seek to provide such counseling filed suit in the United States Distri

Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS

*345SULLIVAN, Judge (dissenting): (I) Overview The majority opinion creates a new legal right for a military accused to have legally adequate and separate findings of guilty1 dismissed because they constitute an “unreasona

291 F.2d 726 J. P. ROGERS, Appellant,v.WESTHOMA OIL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee (two cases).A. L. HILBIG, Appellant,v.WESTHOMA OIL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.Frank G. BOLES and Katie M. Boles, Appellants,v.WESTHOMA OIL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee (seven cases).Blanche ENGEL, Appellant,v.WESTHOMA OIL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee (two cases).Robert W. BAUGHMAN and Helen E. Baughman,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 267PA21 Filed 31 January 2025 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANCISCO EDGAR TIRADO On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, No. COA20-213 (N.C. Ct. App. June 15, 2021), affirming judgments entered on 30 August 2019 by Judge James F. Ammons Jr. in Superior Court, Cumberland C

Opinion WHITE, P. J. This petition for writ of mandate challenges a trial court ruling that petitioner’s speedy retrial rights (Pen. Code, § 1382) were not violated by a continuance granted counsel to permit preparation of a transcript of the first trial. Initially we denied the petition, but upon order of the Supreme Court we issued the alternative writ and have heard argument on the petition. We conclude aga

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0070p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC.; GUN OWNERS │ FOUNDATION; VIRGINIA CITIZENS DE

*74 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND... 76 A. Statutory Framework: The Endangered Species Act Of 1973... 76 1. The 1973 Act.. .77

416 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2005) Dr. Steven MACARTHUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:00 CV 00584 BSJ. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. June 13, 2005. *1099 *1100 *1101 *1102<

794 F.Supp. 899 (1992) Vernon MASAYESVA, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, For and on Behalf of the HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. Peterson ZAH, Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council of the Navajo Indian Tribe, For and on Behalf of the NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, Defendant, v. Evelyn JAMES, et al., Intervenors. No. CIV 74-842 PCT EHC. United States District Court, D. Ariz

77 B.R. 843 (1987) In re INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. In re UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, aka National Clearing House Company, a Trust, Debtor. In re ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. Robert D. MERRILL, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. David ABBOTT, et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. Nos. C-84-0927W, C-84-0928J and consolidated ca

*135LAKE, Justice. This is an appeal from an order entered essentially in plaintiffs’ favor by the Honorable Jack A. Thompson in Superior Court, Wake County, pursuant to assignment and designation of the case as an exceptional case under Rule 2.1 of the General Rules of Practice. Following a two-week trial, including the testimony of twenty-four witnesses and 1,689 page

OPINION HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge: Kenneth Jamal Lighty, James Everett Flood, III, and Lorenzo Anthony Wilson were charged in a five-count indictment by a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Maryland with kidnapping resulting in the death of Eric Hayes, and aiding and abetting the same, 18 U.S.C.

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

18 Cal.3d 450 (1976) 556 P.2d 1090 134 Cal. Rptr. 639 SUSANNAH BRIGHT, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. L.A. 30555. Supreme Court of California. December 6, 1976. *452 COUNSEL Leon Le

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 06-6 KENNETH JAMAL LIGHTY, a/k/a Goat, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 09-6 KE

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. These 27 consolidated appeals are from separate judgments entered in declaratory judgment actions brought by lessors or their successors to determine whether the oil and gas leases involved had terminated as to all horizons below sea level at the expiration of their respective primary terms because of failure to obtain production. They present a common question of law bearing on similar and! undisput

1. The time to be allowed counsel to prepare for trial is in the sound discretion of the trial judge, which discretion will not be interfered with by this court, unless abused. (a) Where a motion is made to continue a criminal case on the ground of an absent witness, the showing required by the Code, § 81-1410, must *Page 61 be made under oath, as provided in § 27-2002; and where, as in the instant case, there was no showing made