Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the following motions to dismiss: EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 85); DEFENDANTS HOMER CITY OWNER-LESSORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 87); NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 88); and PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY’S MOTION TO

Case: 23-60069 Document: 570-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ March 25, 2

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 28, 2022 Decided March 3, 2023 No. 21-1146 MIDWEST OZONE GROUP, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB, ET AL.,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 22-3026 ___________ KEYSTONE-CONEMAUGH PROJECTS LLC, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ADMINISTRATOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY _______________________

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 20, 2019 Decided September 6, 2019 No. 17-1258 AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT SMALL RETAILERS COALITION, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-1027, 18-1040, 1

Case: 23-60069 Document: 632-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED M

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Today we are presented with claims brought by the United States asserting that Luminant Generation Company and Big Brown Power Company violated the Clean Air Act by failing to obtain a statutorily mandated preconstruction permit for the modification of their facilities. The government seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief. Because the government fi

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge. Presently before the Court are four Motions for Summary Judgment [50, 52, 55, 59] filed by Defendant City of West Point. Each motion for summary judgment corresponds with the claims asserted by the four separate Plaintiffs involved in this action. After reviewing the motions, responses, rules, and authorities, the Court finds as follows:

Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. B.P. P.L.C., et al.; Anne Arundel County, Maryland v. B.P. P.L.C., et al; City of Annapolis v. B.P. P.L.C., et al., No. 11, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Booth, J. FEDERAL DISPLACEMENT/PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW CLAIMS The Supreme Court of Maryland considered three consolidated cases—one case filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and two cases filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. In these cases, the Mayor and Council of Baltimore City

OPINION OF THE COURT VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. Section 169A of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7491, and implementing regulations promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) require states to evaluate the impact that emissions from certain sources of pollution within their borders have on atmospheric visibility in national parks and w

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q, invites each state to craft a plan (a “state implementation plan”) to control the levels of certain air pollutants. Most state plans include “Prevention of Significant Deterioration” (PSD) programs. These programs are designed to prevent backsliding in “attainment areas” (regions that meet or exceed the Act’

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 11, 2025 Decided January 20, 2026 No. 23-1155 SPOKANE AIRPORT BOARD, PETITIONER v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of a Final Order of the Transportation Security Administration James A. McPhee argued

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the following motions of the defendant, Diageo Americas Supply, Inc. (“Diageo”): (1) Motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim (DN 18); and

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 24-SEP-2024 11:47 AM Dkt. 44 OP

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court in this consolidated action are two motions for a preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Bahia Amawi ("Amawi") and Plaintiffs John Pluecker, Zachary Abdelhadi, Obinna Dennar, and George Hale (the "Pluecker Plaintiffs") (together, "Plaintiffs"), (Amawi Mot. Prelim. Inj., Dkt. 8; Pluecker Mot. Prelim. Inj., 1:18-CV-1100, Dkt. 14),1 and respons

Case: 13-40326 Document: 00512739700 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2014 No. 13-40326

Case: 13-40326 Document: 00512752300 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2014 No. 13-40326

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 86PA24 Filed 21 March 2025 EMILY HAPPEL, individually, TANNER SMITH, a minor, and EMILY HAPPEL on behalf of TANNER SMITH as his mother v. GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY, INC. On discretionary appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 292 N.C. App. 563, 899 S.E