Cases

OPINION & ORDER Seibel, Judge. , Before the Court are Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 112), and Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Class Certification, (Doc, 99). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED as modified below. , *138

606 F.3d 119 (2010) Douglas A. JONES; Andrea M. Jones, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Appellants v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.; Chase Home Finance, LLC; Citimortgage, Inc.; Citicorp Home Mortgage Services, Inc.; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; Fifth Third Mortgage Company; Florida Capital Bank, N.A.; GMAC Mortgage Corporation; HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA); * Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for I

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MILANI CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-3669 (TJK) CREATIVE CONCEPTS GROUP, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case illustrates why Congress provided for recovery of attorneys’ fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(

HORTON, Justice. This case arises from the breach of a residential construction agreement. Homeowners Louis and Patricia Caravella appeal from the district court’s judgment, following a court trial, dismissing their fraud counterclaim against respondents, Frontier Development Group, LLC (FDG) and Michael Horn, FDG’s owner/manager. The Caravellas also appeal from the district court’s decision that Horn was not personally liab

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge. Plaintiff William Klein brings this employment action alleging that Defendant Torrey Point Group, his former employer, failed to make required overtime, severance, commission, and bonus payments to him in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), and various common-law causes of action. Pending befo

OPINION THUMMA, Judge: ¶ 1 By statute, an appeal may be taken from “a final judgment entered in an action.” A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(1) (2016).1 Consistent with this directive, the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure describe two types of “final judgments:” (1) a “final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties,” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 54(b), and (2) a final judgm

23-7612 Gimpel v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2024 (Argued: December 5, 2024 Decided: September 29, 2025) Docket No. 23-7612 SALAMON GIMPEL, ROSEWOOD FUNERAL HOME, Lead Plaintiffs–Appellants,

DECISION AND ORDER JEREMIAH J. McCarthy, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION The parties have consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) [47].1 Submitted for my consideration is the parties’ “Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Conditional Certification of an FLSA Collective Action for Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) JOSEPH A. STALLARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2703 (RBW) ) GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., et al., )

Justice Devine delivered the opinion of the Court. The Structured Settlement Protection Act requires court approval to validate the transfer of a payee's structured-settlement-payment rights to another. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 141.004. The court here approved the transfer but did so in two different orders, creating a dispute between the parties over which order should control

Maryland Department of Health v. Shawn Orland Myers, Jr., et al., Nos. 1901, 2074, 2150, 2162, 2163, 2280, 2281, 2283, 2284, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2289, 2290, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Graeff, J. CONSTRUCTIVE CIVIL CONTEMPT — STATUTORY SANCTIONS — DUE PROCESS Where the court finds an individual to be incompetent to stand trial (“IST”) and dangerous and commits the individual to the Maryland Department of Health (the “Department”) with an order to admit the defendant to a designated health f

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00131-CV OZO CAPITAL, INC., BILTMORE APPELLANTS FUNDING II, LLC, AND DFI-OTH, LLC V. VANCE SYPHERS AND CHRIS APPELLEES EDENS ---------- FROM THE 48TH DISTRI

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARVINDER (“SONNY”) KAKAR, ) ) and ) ) SEEMA KAKAR, TRUSTEE OF ) THE KAKAR FAMILY ) IRREVOCABLE TRUST U/T/A ) DATED DECEMBER 29, 2009 ) ) and ) ) SEVA HOLDINGS INC.,

25 A.3d 967 (2011) 421 Md. 94 HOVNANIAN LAND INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, et al. v. ANNAPOLIS TOWNE CENTRE AT PAROLE, LLC. No. 71, September Term, 2010. Court of Appeals of Maryland. July 20, 2011. *969 Philip A. Sechler (David M. Krinsky of Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C.); 1 James A. McGuire (McG

*194MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The States of Montana and Nevada allege that pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently overstate the published “average wholesale prices” (“AWP’s”) of many of their prescription drugs to the detriment of the States, which reimburse providers based on AWP’s, and their ci

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2021 Term FILED _______________ November 19, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 20-0722 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion issued August 6, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00548-CV ——————————— MADISON DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC, QUATTRO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AND MICHAEL LIYEOS, Appellants V.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COLUMBIA PIPELINE GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED MERGER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2018-0484-JTL OPINION RESOLVING POST-TRIAL ISSUES Date Submitted: January 19, 2024 Date Decided: May 15, 2024 Ned Weinberger, Brendan W. Sullivan, LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LL