Cases

173 S.W.3d 891 (2005) Jimmy R. NEAL, Appellant v. WISCONSIN HARD CHROME, INC., d/b/a Texas Hard Chrome, Inc. and/or Texas Hard Chrome, Inc., Appellee. No. 06-05-00049-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted July 6, 2005. Decided September 29, 2005. *892 E. Ben Franks, Law Offices of E. Ben Franks, Tex

USCA4 Appeal: 25-4041 Doc: 42 Filed: 03/27/2026 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-4041 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JERONE TYRELL HOLMAN, Defendant – Appellant.

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court and the following disposition is made: {¶ 1} Defendant/Appellant William O'Neal appeals from the decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to thirteen years in prison for several charges arising from an incident in October of 2004. We find that we lack jurisdiction to decide this appeal. {¶ 2}

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2021 IL App (4th) 170682 FILED March 26, 2021 NO. 4-17-0682 Carla Bender 4th District Appel

[Cite as State v. O'Neal, 2015-Ohio-5181.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 15CA0052-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE WILLIAM B. O'NEAL

[Cite as State v. O'Neal, 2015-Ohio-4006.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 14CA0094-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE WILLIAM B. O'NEAL

[Cite as State v. O'Neal, 2012-Ohio-5564.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 12CA0032-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE WILLIAM B. O'NE

OPINION By the Court, Shearing, J.: This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict in an action for battery and false imprisonment awarding compensatory and punitive damages and from the denial of a motion for a new trial. Appellants’ principal argument is that the corporation is not liable for punitive damages based on the actions of its security officers. We agree, but affirm the remai

[Cite as State v. O'Neal, 2012-Ohio-396.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 10CA0140-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE WILLIAM B. O'NEAL

730 N.E.2d 39 (2000) 191 Ill.2d 204 246 Ill.Dec. 359 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Tafford Lee HOLMAN, Appellant. No. 85897. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 20, 2000. Rehearing Denied May 30, 2000. *41 Stephen E. Eberhardt, Tinley Park, Robert H

99 S.W.3d 349 (2003) DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Diversified Financial Southeast, Inc., Appellants, v. HILL, HEARD, O'NEAL, GILSTRAP & GOETZ, P.C. a/k/a Hill, Gilstrap, Moorhead, White, Bodoin & Webster, A Professional Corporation, Dwight A. Heard, Frank Hill, Jointly and Severally, Appellees. No. 2-98-276-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February

JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Tafford Lee Holman, brings this appeal from an order by the circuit court of Will County dismissing, without an evidentiary hearing, his second post-conviction petition. Because the defendant received the death penalty for one of the underlying offenses, the presen

OPINION LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice. INTRODUCTION Appellants Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. (“Systems”) and Diversified Fi*617nancial Southeast, Inc. (“Southeast”) (collectively “Diversified”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees Hill, Heard, O’Neal, Gilstrap & Goetz, P.C. a/k/a H

HIGGINS, Commissioner. David Neal, charged in Count I of an information with robbery, first degree, by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon, and in Counts II and III with assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought, was convicted by a jury which assessed his punishment at imprisonment for ten years on each of Counts I and II, and for five years on Count III. Sentences and judgment were rendered pursuant to the ver

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-171-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT V.

HOLMAN, Judge. Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition. See § 564.440.1 The jury fixed his punishment at a fine of $250. He appealed to the Springfield Court of Appeals (since January 1, 1972, Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District). That court, with one judge dissenting, reversed and remanded because of error in the admission of evidence hold

</

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court overruling Defendant's plea of privilege. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were made by the trial court. The parties will be referred to her as they were in the trial court. Plaintiff (Holman) brought this action against defendant (Pit Construction Company) for property damage to a truck and some cattle. Plaintiff alleged: This damage occurred when his truck loaded with cattle turned over while traveling on the shoulde

Appellant was one of two defendants in tort actions brought by Jessie M. Flowers and her husband Clyde Flowers. The complaints charged the injury and damages of plaintiffs were the proximate result of the concurring negligence of appellant and defendant, Rush, Skid Pallet Company. The accident out of which the claimed injuries and damages arose, occurred when Mrs. Flowers' automobile was struck from the rear while stopped at an intersection, by a truck driven by appellant O'Nea