⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Holly Clark”

Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018-12-24 · Published · cited 0× · 434 P.3d 596; 246 Ariz. 85
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge: ¶1 Holly C. appeals from the juvenile court's dismissal of a private dependency petition filed by her mother, Elizabeth F., who sought temporary custody of Holly's six-year-old son, G.C. Because Elizabeth F. failed to appeal from the dismissal order, and because we conclude Holly, as a respondent in the dependency proceeding, has not been legally "aggrieved" by the dismissal, see A.R.S. § 8-235(A
Clark v. Clarkpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 58 So. 3d 1276; 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 287; 2010 WL 3937938
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1278 Sherri Clark ("the wife") appeals from a judgment of the Houston Circuit Court divorcing her from William T. Clark ("the husband") to the extent that the judgment divided the parties' property and declined to award her alimony or to reserve the right to award her alimony in the future. We affirm in part and
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 115 F. App'x 326
MEMORANDUM * Holly Clark appeals the summary judgment entered in her action against MCI Communications Corporation, dba World-Com, Inc., for retaliation in violation of California Gov’t Code § 12940 and California public policy. We are not persuaded by MCI’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We deny the motion to dismiss and affirm the grant of summary judgment. To establish a prima facie c
People v. Clarkpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2016-06-27 · Published · cited 1397× · 63 Cal. 4th 522; 372 P.3d 811; 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 407; 2016 Cal. LEXIS 4576
Opinion CUÉLLAR, J. An Orange County jury found defendant William Clinton Clark guilty of the first degree murders of Kathy Lee (count 1) and Ardell Williams (count 7). (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189.) 1 The jury found true the five special circumstance allegations charged, as follows: that defendant commit
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-108-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS <
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-108-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG VALERIE CLARK AND HOLLY Appellants, VENTURE, A TEXAS JOINT VENTURE, v. SOUTH PADRE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees. On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas
District Court, District of Columbia · 1984-03-29 · Published · cited 2× · 587 F. Supp. 1152; 83 Oil & Gas Rep. 9; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18094
587 F.Supp. 1152 (1984) The ANGELINA HOLLY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. William P. CLARK, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-1212. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 29, 1984. *1153 John P. Foley, Jr., Marcus W. Sisk, Jr., Sisk, Foley, Hultin & Driver, Washington, D.C., for plai
Clark v. Kindleypublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007-02-09 · Published · cited 3× · 10 So. 3d 1005; 2007 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 93; 2007 WL 431018
Sandra B. Clark sued Larry Allen Kindley, alleging that Kindley had negligently and wantonly caused a collision between the vehicle she was driving and the trailer attached to the pickup truck Kindley was driving. Kindley answered, asserting, among other things, that Clark had been contributorily negligent. Kindley filed a motion for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") on the wantonness claim, which the trial court granted. The negligence claim was tried to a jury, which rendered a
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995-12-29 · Published · cited 12× · 190 B.R. 297; 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1860; 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 417; 1995 WL 776092
190 B.R. 297 (1995) In the Matter of HOLLY'S, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 91-84931. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. December 29, 1995. Thomas C. Clinton, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Debtor Holly's, Inc. James D. Clarke, Assistant Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for the State of Michigan. OPINION REGARDING MOTION TO SET ASIDE STATE
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JANUARY 24, 2013 Session HOLLY CASTLE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF EMILY CASTLE, A MINOR CHILD; AND JANA CLARK v. DAVID DORRIS LOGGING, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-001806-07, Div. IV Gina C. Higgins, Judge No. W2012-00917-COA-R3-CV - Filed
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014-12-30 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 WY 169; 340 P.3d 288; 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 192; 2014 WL 7403823
BURKE, Chief Justice. [T1] Appellants, Fern and Travis Clark, brought an action against the Ryan Park Property and Homeowners Association seeking an order, pursuant to the Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation Act, requiring the Association to allow the Clarks to inspect and copy certain corporate records. The district court entered the order, but denied the Clarks' request to recover cos
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HOLLY LAWSON, │
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 276 F. App'x 625
MEMORANDUM ** There’s no evidence that covert videotaping of police locker rooms was a “longstanding practice or custom which constitutes the standard operating procedure” of Clark County. Menotti v. City of Seattle, 409 F.3d 1113, 1147 (9th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). Nor have plaintiffs set forth any facts to show that Chief Broderick, “as a matter of state law,” had “final pol
Young v. Clarkpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991-07-09 · Published · cited 26× · 814 P.2d 364; 10 A.L.R. 5th 1074; 15 Brief Times Rptr. 962; 1991 Colo. LEXIS 427; 1991 WL 123095
Justice VOLLACK delivered the Opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals unpublished decision, Young v. Clark, No. 89CA0421 (Colo. App. Mar. 22, 1990). The issue to be resolved is whether the trial court’s submission of a “sudden emergency” instruction in this automobile collision case was improper. The court of appeals held that the trial court did not err by so instr
Delaware Court of Common Pleas · 2023-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY DELMARVA BUSINESS ) OPTIMIZATION CONSULTANTS, INC.,) D/B/A SCHOOLEY MITCHELL OF DELMARVA ) ) ) Appellant/Plaintiff Below, ) Vv. ) C.A. No. CPU6-21-000717 ) FELTON AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC) D/B/A HOLLY KIA OF SELBYVILLE ) AND FELTON ) ) s) Appellee/Defendant Below Robert S. Bria, Esq. Tasha M. Stevens-Gueh, Esq. The Shachtman Law Firm Andrew & Stevens-Gueh, LLC 1475 South Governors Ave. 115 South Bedford Street
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 20, 2006 Session IN RE MIKAYLA GRACE CLARK SAMUEL KENT CLARK v. LEAH JOY CERDEN An Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Madison County No. 34-0261 Christy R. Little, Judge
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
June 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals KRIS HALL AND HOLLY J. JONES, LARRY BISHOP AND CYNTHIA BISHOP, GEORGE CLARK AND DEBORAH CLARK, GARY MCGREGOR AND TERI MCGREGOR, SOLEDAD PINEDA AND CAROL SEVERANCE, Appellants NO. 14-12-00323-CV V. JACKIE BEAN, DAN KELLOGG, KAY LEIPZIG, JANICE LUTHY, BOB
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed June 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00323-CV KRIS HALL AND HOLLY J. JONES, LARRY BISHOP AND CYNTHIA BISHOP, GEORGE CLARK AND DEBORAH CLARK, GARY MCGREGOR AND TERI MCGREGOR, SOLEDAD PINEDA AND CAROL SEVERANCE, Appellants, V. JACKIE BEAN, DAN KELLOGG, KAY LEIPZIG, JANICE LUTHY, BOB
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04134
Matter of Holly P. v George Q. (2025 NY Slip Op 04134) Matter of Holly P. v George Q. 2025 NY Slip Op 04134 Decided on July 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
08/13/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2024 KANDY PAGE v. HOLLY CIKALO, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Overton County No. 22-CV-11, 22-CV-10 Daryl A. Colson, Judge1