Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 13]. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amendment and Commerce Clause claims for lack of standing is GRANTED, and Defendants’ 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs due process, e

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

STEADMAN, Senior Judge: A jury found appellant Cephus Hollis guilty of fifteen criminal offenses relating to his vicious conduct in two separate incidents five days apart, the first with Mr. Hampton Gathers as the victim and the second with Mr. Zhong Zu as the victim. At issue in this appeal are his two convictions for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury and his three convi

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 17-1189L, 17-1191L, 17-1194L, 17-1195L, 17-1206L, 17-1215L, 17-1216L 17-1232L, 17-1235L, 17-1277L, 17-1303L, 17-1300L Filed: September 25, 2017 ************************************** Y AND J PROPERTIES, LTD., * individually and on behalf of all other * persons similarly situated, * Plaintiffs,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 17-1189L, 17-1191L, 17-1194L, 17-1195L, 17-1206L, 17-1215L, 17-1216L 17-1232L, 17-1235L, 17-1277L, 17-1303L, 17-1300L Filed: September 25, 2017 ************************************** Y AND J PROPERTIES, LTD., * individually and on behalf of all other * persons similarly situated, * Plaintiffs,

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Antonio Jerome Hollis appeals his 168-month sentence, arguing that the district court improperly denied him credit for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to § 3El.l(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court' denied him credit solely on the basis of his failure to give early enough notice of his intent to plead guilty.

*1276ante, p. 1177; ante, p. 1110; ante, p. 1156; ante, p. 1111; ante, p. 1111; ante, p. 1178; ante, p. 1174; ante, p. 1180; ante, p. 1118;

565 U. S. 1276. Petition for rehearing denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 558 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 740, 175 L. Ed. 2d 521, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8626.

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the constitutionality of a 1986 federal statute that makes possession of a “maehinegun” unlawful. Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis, as trustee of his own revocable trust, submitted an application to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to manufacture a maehinegun. ATF denied his application pursuant to the 1986 s

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether the subject of an arrest warrant may challenge the use of evidence found in plain view during a protective sweep in a third party’s residence. Law enforcement officers possessed an arrest warrant for Shedrick Hollis and learned that he could be found in an apartment the officers suspected to be a drug hous

ORDER Darren Hollis pleaded guilty to misappropriating postal funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 1711, and was sentenced to twelve months and one day in prison. Hollis appeals, but his newly appointed counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous arguments to pursue and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hollis opposes counsel’s motion. See Cie. R. 51(b). We confine our review t

ORDER Darren Hollis pleaded guilty to misappropriating postal funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 1711, and was sentenced to twelve months and one day in prison. Hollis appeals, but his newly appointed counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous arguments to pursue and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hollis opposes counsel’s motion. See Cie. R. 51(b). We confine our review t

552 F.3d 1191 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Jack HOLLIS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3293. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 6, 2009. *1192 Submitted on the briefs:[*] Melanie S. Morgan, Morgan Pilate LLC, Olathe, KS, for Defendant-Appellant. Eric F. Melgr

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.