Cases

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. Shawn Holley, appeals from the judgment of the district court 1 affirming the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denying Holley’s application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-83, and

OPINION CHESLER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Anita Holley, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1383(c)(3), 405(g), seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s (“the Commissioner”) decision denying her application for Social Security Disability Benefits. Plaintiff argues that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed. For the r

739 F.Supp.2d 836 (2010) Cedric HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:08-CV-183-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. August 17, 2010. Barbara Von Euler, Kathleen Shannon Glancy, P.A., Wilmington, NC, for Plaintiff. Mark J. Goldenberg, Social Security Administration, Baltim

931 F.Supp. 840 (1996) Clayton W. HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 94-8179-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 30, 1996. *841 *842 *843 Phillip C. Houston, Houston & Shalhoub, P.

*********** Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes

258 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2003) Pamela E. MOSS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 01-2393-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 28, 2003. *1156 Joan H. Deans, J.H. Deans Law Office, Raytown, MO, for Plaintiff. Melanie D. Caro, David D Zimmerman, Office of United States Attorney, Kansa

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Joanne Hacker appeals the district court’s1 order granting the Commissioner summary judgment and thereby affirming the earlier denial of Social Security disability insurance benefits that Hacker sought. Hacker claims that the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying benefits was unsupported by substantial evidence because the ALJ misweighed the testimony of vario

734 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Corliss Larsen BAUER, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil No. 08-6088 (RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 24, 2010. *776 Corliss Larsen Bauer, Lino Lakes, MN, pro se. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendan

695 F.Supp.2d 925 (2010) Beverly Arlene MORAINE, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil No. 08-5982 (JRT/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 8, 2010. *927 Beverly Arlene Moraine, St. Paul, MN, pro se. Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Att

618 S.E.2d 517 (2005) 217 W.Va. 508 Sharon Kay MARCUS, Individually and as Guardian of Tonya Lynn Marcus, a Protected Person; John William Marcus, Individually, and Christy Michele Marcus Page, Individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants v. Roger A. HOLLEY, Individually and/or as an Agent, Employee, Servant and/or Representative of Winans Sanitary Supply Co., Inc., a West Virginia Corporation; and John Doe(s), Individuals,

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Robert K. Haley 2 appeals the District Court’s 3 affirmance of the decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny his applications for Social Security disability benefits. We affirm.

MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Mary J. O’Donnell appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND O’Donnell was born in 1955 and has

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2357 ___________ Shawn A. Holley, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the We

668 So.2d 645 (1996) ACE DISPOSAL and Florida Air Condition Contractors, Appellants, v. Clarence HOLLEY, Appellee. No. 94-3384. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 20, 1996. Thomas H. McDonald of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Orlando, for appellants. Irvin A. Meyers of Meyers, Mooney & Meyers, Orla

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners-respondents, a family of five (Wayne Holley, his wife Gayle Holley and their children) reside in the same household with the four McQuoid children (offspring of Gayle by a previous marriage). The Holleys receive Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits from the United States Social Security Administration. The McQuoids are recipients of New York State public assistance

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: This case raises difficult issues of application of the Eleventh Amendment in suits involving welfare benefits. For reasons given below, we affirm a district court judgment that awards plaintiff such benefits retroactively against a County Social Services Commissioner, denies such an award against a State Social Services Commissioner and awards counsel fees to plaintiff against both defendants. <

605 F.2d 638 Gayle McQuoid HOLLEY, Individually and on behalf of JamesMcQuoid, Norman McQuoid, Thomas McQuoid, Douglas McQuoid,Michael McQuoid, and Adelaine McQuoid, her minor children,Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.Abe LAVINE, as Commissioner of the New York State Departmentof Social Services, and James Reed, as Commissioner of theMonroe County Department of Social Services,Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellee

553 F.2d 845 Gayle McQuoid HOLLEY, Individually and on behalf of JamesMcQuoid, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Abe LAVINE, as Commissioner of the New York State Departmentof Social Services, and James Reed, asCommissioner of the Monroe CountyDepartment of Social Services,Defendants-Appellees. No. 731, Docket 76-7588. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.

WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment entered by Judge Harold P. Burke in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Plaintiff is an alien unlawfully residing in the United States but covered by an official communication from the Immigration and Naturalization Service stating that it “does not contemplate enforcing her departure from the United States at this time.” De

PER CURIAM: Gayle McQuoid Holley, individually and on behalf of her six children, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Harold P. Burke, J., dis*1295missing her complaint against defendants Abe Lavine, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, and James Reed, Commissioner of the Mon