Cases

FILED FEBRUARY 23, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WAS

330 Argued and submitted February 28; conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed August 10; petition for review denied December 15, 2022 (370 Or 602) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL JOHN HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circu

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.: This case concerns, inter alia, the scope of Congressional immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause of the United States Constitution, art. I, § 6, cl. 1. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) seeks an order, pursuant to Section 21(c) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(c), requiring the Committ

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-17-00172-CR NO. 09-17-00173-CR NO. 09-17-00174-CR NO. 09-17-00175-CR NO. 09-17-00176-CR _________________

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-17-00177-CR NO. 09-17-00178-CR NO. 09-17-00179-CR NO. 09-17-00180-CR NO. 09-17-00181-CR _________________

Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. John Doe, et al., No. 9, September Term, 2024; Board of Education of Harford County, et al. v. John Doe, No. 10, September Term, 2024; The Key School, Inc., et al. v. Valerie Bunker, Misc. No. 2, September Term, 2024. VESTED RIGHT – STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS – ART. 24, MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS – ART. III, § 40, CONSTITUTION OF MARYLAND The Constitution of Maryland prohibits all legislation that retroactively abrogates vested property rights without

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1122V Filed: March 29, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * REBECCA HOFFMAN, as administrator * of the ESTATE OF KAREN * CHRISTNER, * To Be Published

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARCELLAS HOFFMAN, No. 20-15396 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:16-cv-01617- LJO-SAB PRESTON, Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and D. COYLE; MATEVOISAIN, Warden; L. T.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

Schindler, J. ¶ 1 Following the second trial in this case, a jury convicted Bruce Allen Hummel of premeditated murder in the first degree of his spouse, Alice Kristina Hummel. Even when viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence does not support finding the essential element of premeditation beyond a reasonable doubt.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 75218-9-1 Respondent, V. PUBLISHED OPINION CLIFFORD PAUL LAPOINTE, JR, Appellant. FILED: November 6, 2017 SCHINDLER, J. — In 2013, the Washington State Legislature amended RCW 9A.52.100 to elevate the crime of gross misde

ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM

681 F.Supp.2d 86 (2010) Angela HOFFMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1924 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 4, 2010. *87 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Sarah L. Knapp, Attorne

730 F.Supp.2d 109 (2010) Angela HOFFMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1924 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 11, 2010. *110 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Sarah L. Knapp, Attorney Gener

Siddoway, C.J. ¶1 — The late Allan Parmelee, while incarcerated in the Washington State Penitentiary, persuasively argued to the Washington Supreme Court that public record requestors like himself are necessary parties when third parties seek to enjoin agencies from responding to requests under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. As a result, two cases that Washington De

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,

643 F.Supp.2d 132 (2009) Angela HOFFMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1924 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 17, 2009. *134 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Sarah L. Knapp, Attorn

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 632 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 633 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT