Cases

670 N.E.2d 1299 (1996) Julian Maurice LACEY, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 45A03-9512-CR-434. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 21, 1996. *1300 Jeff Schlesinger, Appellate Public Defender, Crown Point, for Appellant-Defendant. Pamela Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, James D. Dimitr

In re Hoffman, Victor, Jr.;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 409,388; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 2183. Denied. VICTORY, J., not on panel.

[Cite as Balsley v. Lacey, 2014-Ohio-4053.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER BALSLEY : JUDGES: : : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Petitioner- Appellant : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

344 Pa. Superior Ct. 576 (1985) 496 A.2d 1256 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Rodney L. LACEY, Appellee. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Michael SMITH, Appellee. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William STEWART, Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 2, 1985. Decided August 9, 1985.

810 F.Supp. 244 (1992) Janice K. LACEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INDIANA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. No. IP 90-1733 C. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. November 6, 1992. *245 Mary Jane Lapointe, Lowe Gray Steele and Hoffman, Indianapolis, IN, Larry P. Weinberg, Kirschner, Weinberg & Dem

MEMORANDUM JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the following defendants: “Bank of America, N.A. as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, GMAC-REF Holding Company, LLC, Orlans Moran PLLC, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., and Darlene McCarthy” (collectively, the “Defendants”), thro

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06

[Cite as U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hoffman, 2020-Ohio-4114.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT U.S. Specialty Insurance Company et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : v. : Nos. 19AP-189 and 19AP-855 Eric J. Hoffman,

843 A.2d 153 (2004) 155 Md. App. 247 Arthur J. HOFFMAN, et al. v. Toyome STAMPER, et al. No. 560, Sept. Term, 2002. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 27, 2004. *154 *155 *156 *157

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a re-sentencing upon remand whereby the trial court's re-sentencing included the imposition of a jail term rather than a less restrictive imposition of community control which had originally been imposed. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LAW {¶ 2} On September 17, 200

862 F.2d 38 Graeme MacArthur LACEY, Appellant,v.CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, a corporation; Hanlon & WilsonCompany, a corporation; Teledyne Inc., acorporation; and John Does 1--10, Appellees. No. 87-3822. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued June 9, 1988.Decided Nov. 21, 1988. Mi

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Graeme MacArthur Lacey appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his products liability complaint on forum non conveniens grounds. Plaintiff, an Australian citizen, was injured in a plane crash in British Columbia. He later instituted this diversity action in the district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania seeking damages for personal inj

Leventritt, J. This is an action for divorce. The defense is that the alleged act of adultery was not meretricious in that the plaintiff had theretofore procured a decree of divorce against the defendant pursuant to which he had legally married the alleged corespondent. The plaintiff claims that this decree is void and of no effect. The parties were married at the city of Omaha, in the State of Nebraska, on the

Hart, J., concurring. The claimed errors upon which the Court of Appeals based its reversal of the judgment will be discussed in the order named by that court in its entry of reversal. First, it is claimed that the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain evidence offered by Laird. Plaintiff in her petition charges that the operation on her nose was without her permission and consent and over her remonstr

738 F.2d 421 E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A.v.Hoffman Import & Distributing Co. 83-5332, 83-5333 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 6/21/84 D.N.J., Lacey, J. AFFIRMED

The opinion of the court was delivered by Erancis, J. Plaintiff Hamilton Earms, Inc., a licensed wholesale milk dealer of this State, instituted a declaratory judgment proceeding in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, in order to obtain a declaration as to the validity of a regulation of the Office of Milk Industry which prohibits the wholesale delivery of milk on Sunday in certain milk marketing areas of t

Hipple, P. J., This is an appeal by defendant and its insurance carrier from the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirming the findings of fact, conclusions of law and award of compensation by the compensation referee who found that Sheldon A. Hoffman, claimant, while in the course of his employment by Nittany Printing & Publishing Company, publisher of Centre Daily Times, sustained an accident which was superimpo

Argued March 6, 1934. The claimant's husband, Elisha Hoffman, died following a heated argument with his foreman, over the subject of his arriving late at his work. The argument lasted five or ten minutes and was accompanied by provocative epithets by the foreman and some gesticulations by Hoffman. At the conclusion of the argument Hoffman mounted his `loky' engine, on which he was employed as engineer, ran it about 1,000 or 1,500 feet, stopped to take a drink of coffee and either dismounted o

Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This matter came before the Court on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ronald Hof in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for FoodServiceWarehouse.com, L.L.C. ("FSW"). I. Facts Pride Centric Resources, Inc., f.k.a. Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc., ("Pride") is a food service equipment collective. Members of Pride forme

ORDER Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiffs Arizona Republic, Associated Press, Guardian News & Media LLC, KPHO Broadcasting Corporation, KPNX-TV Channel 12, and Star Publishing Company (Doc. 43), and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Charles L. Ryan (Doc. 45). For the following reasons, the