Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hoffman v. International Diamond Distributors Inc.”
256 B.R. 1 (2000) In re TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Debtor. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-00528-BKC-6C1. Adversary No. 91-022. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. November 9, 2000. *2
955 F.Supp. 220 (1997) AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARLBORO FOOTWORKS, LTD., Laurence D. Koplan, Steven Goldberg, Gredico Footwear Ltd., Town Shoes Ltd., Bata Industries Ltd., Goldport Enterprises, Inc., Marlboro Footworks Ltd., (Taiwan), Masateru Uehara, Frederick Atkins, Inc., Weiss & Neuman Shoe Co., Melville Corporation, Shoe Carnival, Inc., and National Independent Retailers, Inc., Defendants. No. 9
Threeline Imports, Inc. v. Vernikovpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ANN DONNELLY, District Judge The plaintiff, Threeline Imports, Inc., initiated this action against defendants Grigoriy Vernikov and Interpage International Inc. d/b/a Interpage Co. for trademark infringement and counterfeiting pursuant to 15. U.S.C. § 1114 on April 23, 2015. The defendants then asserted federal and state law counterclaims against the plaintiff, including for trademark
Global Quest, LLC v. Horizon Yachts, Inc.public domain
FRIEDMAN, District Judge: Plaintiff Global Quest, LLC. appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on all but one count of plaintiffs amended complaint and to defendant Horizon Yachts, Inc. on its counterclaim for foreclosure of a promissory note. Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s entry of partial final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
*795 OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, in which the sole remaining issue is a counterclaim filed by Defendant Wartburg Enterprises, Inc. (‘Wartburg”) against Plaintiff Jonibach Management Trust, a South African company trading as Bumbo International Trust, (“Bumbo”), al
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 8) EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. (“AV”) initiated this lawsuit against Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. (“TVE”), asserting claims for declaratory relief. More specifically, AV seeks a declaration that it does not infringe on two TVE patents, i. e., the ’936 patent and the
Spectralytics, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.public domain
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND On October 24, 1996, Gary Gustafson filed a patent application covering an apparatus for cutting metal tubing with a laser. The application issued on December 22, 1998 as United States Patent No. 5,852,277 (the '277 patent). The patented apparatus is specifically designed for cutting stents, which
In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend
Armstrong v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC.public domain
678 F.Supp.2d 827 (2009) Timothy ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC., et al., Defendants. No. C07-4107-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. August 26, 2009. *832 Jeff W. Wright, Jill A. Finken, Heidman Redmond Fredregill Patterson Plaza Dykstra & Prahl, Sioux City, IA, Mar
WRIGHT, J. This appeal arises from a jury verdict in favor of appellee, Interactive Digital Solutions, Inc. (“IDS”), on counts of breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, and tortious interference with business relations. The jury awarded undifferentiated damages totaling $769,422 and on June 8, 2011, the Circuit Court for Howard County entered judgment against appellant, B-Line Medical, LLC (“B-Line”). On June
Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.public domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE QUINN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs Marguerite Forsythe, individually and as special administrator to the estate of her late husband, Michael F. Forsythe, and Elizabeth M. Szabala, special administrator of the estate of Gary Szabala, appeal from the judgement of the circuit court granting summar
Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.public domain
FOURTH DIVISION September 29, 2005 1-04-0448 and 1-04-0450 (Consolidated) MARGUERITE FORSYTHE, Individually and ) Appeal from the as Special Administrator of the Estate ) Circuit Court of
DOREL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
36 Cal.Rptr.3d 742 (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1267 DOREL INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent. Jonathan Jackson III, a Minor, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. H028516. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. December 15, 2005. *744 Morgenstein & Jube
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
760 F.Supp.2d 384 (2011) PRINCE OF PEACE ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. TOP QUALITY FOOD MARKET, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 00349(RJH)(FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 12, 2011. *387 David John Hoffman, Law Office David J. Hoffman, Steven Seltzer, Yuen Roccanova Seltzer & Suerd LLP, Po W.
Rainy Lake One Stop, Inc. v. Marigold Foods, Inc.public domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. This is an antitrust action commenced as a class action by purchasers of milk and milk products at wholesale. The defendants are milk processors accused of conspiring to fix their wholesale prices in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. After more than two years of discovery and pretrial motions, the district court
Glow Industries, Inc. v. Lopezpublic domain
252 F.Supp.2d 962 (2002) GLOW INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer LOPEZ, Coty, Inc., a corporation and Does 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 02-06167 MMM (PJWx). United States District Court, CD. California, Western Division. December 18, 2002. *963 *964
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. Kgaapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Motions for Class Certification THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court are two motions for class certification: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Vitamin Products Class and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Choline Chloride Class. Upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs’ Joint Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motions for Cl