Cases

Cupp, J. {¶ 1} For purposes of Crim.R. 4(A), may a person simultaneously hold the positions of deputy sheriff for a county and of deputy clerk for a municipal court located in that same county? Because the appellate court reached the proper conclusion in this matter, we affirm. I. Factual and Procedural Back

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1271THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Board of Commissioners of the County of Eddy's Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support Thereof, filed November 22, 2016 (Doc. 9)("EC Motion"); (ii) the Motion to Dismiss P

288 F.Supp.2d 431 (2003) Terence BODDIE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, et al., Respondents. No. 02 Civ. 8731(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 22, 2003. *432 *433 Terence Boddie, Arthur-Kill Correctional Facility, Staten Island, NY, pro se. Ho

277 F.Supp.2d 280 (2003) Terence BODDIE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, et al., Respondents. No. 03 Civ.2599 RWS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 7, 2003. *281 Terence Boddie, Arthur-Kill Correctional Facility, Staten Island, NY, pro se. Honorable Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of th

[Cite as State v. Matthews, 2024-Ohio-5558.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 14-24-19 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MAURICE R. MATTHEWS, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Union County Common Pleas Court

BYE, Circuit Judge, with whom MURPHY, MELLOY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting. I would deny the motion to vacate the stay of execution entered by the district court on June 12, 2014. First, I point out the Court’s failure to acknowledge the appropriate standard of review in this matter. A district court’s order granting a stay of execution is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.

*429Lanzinger, J. {¶ 1} In this case, defendant-appellant, Brandon Hoffman, challenges the use of evidence obtained as the result of his arrest pursuant to three misdemeanor arrest warrants. We agree with the trial court and court of appeals that the arrest warrants were issued improperly because there was no determination of probable cause. However, we also agree that

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-530 Filed: 6 October 2020 Cumberland County, No. 01 CRS 059934 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES RYAN KELLIHER, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 13 December 2018 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Cumberland County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 February 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assista

JUSTICE HOOD, concurring in the judgment. 124 While I agree that the trial court ultimately, erred by suppressing N.AS.'s statements to the School Resource Officer (S.R.O.), I respectfully reject the majority's conclusion that N.A.S. was not in "custody" under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and J.D.B. *293v.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-530 Filed: 6 October 2020 Cumberland County, No. 01 CRS 059934 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES RYAN KELLIHER, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 13 December 2018 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Cumberland County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 February 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assista

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2020-Ohio-3367.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108371 v. : MELVIN JONES, :

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of quo warranto to oust a police chief and a writ of mandamus to compel a competitive *385promotional examination for police chief. Because the court of appeals erred in dismissing the petition, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings. C

CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} During the last thirteen years the Supreme Court of the United States, relying on neuroscientific evidence of adolescent behavior, issued three opinions declaring that certain sentences imposed on juvenile offenders violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Roper v. Simmons ,

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2015-Ohio-96.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99377 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

JOHNSON, Chief Justice, dissents with reasons. 1In Miller v. Alabama, the United States Supreme Court held “that the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders.” Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). This Court has been asked to decide whether the United States Supreme Court’

[Cite as State v. Clark, 2026-Ohio-447.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Case No. 25CA32 Plaintiff-Appellant, : : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT

*239OPINION HUDSON, Justice. Appellant Mahdi Hassan Ali (“Mahdi”)1 shot and killed three men during a robbery of the Seward Market when he was 16 years old.2 Following a jury trial, he was convicted of three counts of murder that we affirmed on appeal. State v. Ali, 855 N.W.2d 235, 240 (

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jonathan Robins, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 109 M.D. 2023 : Secretary Harry,1 Superintendent : Submitted: September 9, 2024 Salamon, Supervisor Tice, : Supervisor Durst, Mailroom Worke

[Cite as State ex rel. Cuyahoga Cty. v. Jones Lang LaSalle Great Lakes Corporate Real Estate Partners, L.L.C., 2017-Ohio-4066.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CUYAHOGA COUNTY State ex rel. County of Cuyahoga Court of Appeals No. CA-16-104157 Appellant Trial Court No. CV-14-827651 v. Jones

JUSTICE KITTREDGE : *149 **299 At the age of thirteen, petitioner Conrad Slocumb kidnapped and sexually assaulted a teacher before shooting her in the face and head five times and leaving her f