Cases

Hanlon, J. After a jury-waived trial, the defendant was convicted of indecent assault and battery on a person fourteen years of age or older. 2 He argues that his motion for a required finding of not guilty should have been allowed because there was insufficient evidence to pro

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION Opinion by Justice Evans- • This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s orders granting two pleas to the jurisdiction challenging an inverse condemnation counterclaim under article I, section 17 of the Texas Constitution. In its counterclaim, Sloan Creek II, L.L.C. alleged the increased amount and rate of erosion of creek banks on its property due to increased rainwater runoff from highway

*1316 Opinion ELIA, J. This case concerns resolution No. 8132 (Resolution) adopted by respondent City Council of the City of Milpitas (City Council). The Resolution approved amendments to a site development permit, a tentative map, and a conditional use permit for the Citation Resi

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Alejandro Velazquez' was arrested in front of his home in Long Beach, California, for violating California Penal Code § 148, which prohibits resisting or obstructing a police officer. In making the arrest, a Long Beach police officer struck Velazquez with a police baton about eleven times, injuring him. No charges relating

546 F.3d 1299 (2008) T-MOBILE CENTRAL, LLC, as successor in interest to Voicestream Kansas City, Inc., doing business as T-Mobile, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS City, Kansas, Defendant-Appellant, *1300 PCIA, Amicus Curiae. No. 07-3332. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 17, 20

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SPRINT PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a  Delaware limited liability company, wholly-owned by Sprint Telephony PCS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, a California municipality; CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, its governing body; JOSEPH SHERWOOD, in his No. 05-56106 official

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch

WELLS, Judge, dissenting from denial of Rehearing En Banc. I would grant rehearing en banc, withdraw the majority opinion, and affirm the order of the Department of Community Affairs which adopted the recommended order of the administrative law judge (ALJ), finding the small scale amendment at issue consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. I would do so for the following reasons.

WELLS, Judge, dissenting from denial of Rehearing En Banc. I would grant rehearing en banc, withdraw the panel opinion, and affirm the order of the Department of Community Affairs which adopted the recommended order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) finding the small scale amendment at issue consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. I would do so for the following reasons.

583 F.3d 716 (2009) SPRINT PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, wholly-owned by Sprint Telephony PCS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, a California municipality; City Council of the City of Palos Verdes Estates, its governing body; Joseph Sherwood, in his official capacity as Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Palos Verdes Estates; John Flood, in his official capacity as Counc

203 F.Supp.2d 383 (2002) AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP and Upper Dublin Township Zoning Hearing Board, Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-994. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 20, 2002. William E. Benner, Doylestown, PA, for Plaintiff. George H. Knoell, III, Norristown, PA, for Defendants.

(2008) VERIZON WIRELESS (VAW) LLC, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendant. No. 07-2255-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DAVID J. WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an action for declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief pursuant t

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs, various environmental organizations and concerned individuals, seek in-junctive relief against federal officials to limit the United States Navy’s peacetime

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ‘ILIO‘ULAOKALANI COALITION, a  Hawaii nonprofit corporation; NA‘IMI PONO, a Hawaii unincorporated association; KIPUKA, a Hawaii unincorporated association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 05-15915 DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; FRANCIS J. HARVEY, Dr., 

483 F.3d 1364 In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION.Astra Aktiebolag, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astra Merck Enterprises Inc., Astra Merck Inc., KBI-E, Inc., KBI, Inc., and Astrazeneca LP, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,v.Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, andGenpharm, Inc., Kremers Urban Development Co., and Schwarz Pharma, Inc., Defendants. No. 04-1562. No. 04-1563.

EYLER, JAMES R., J., concurring and dissenting, in which HOTTEN, J., joins. These consolidated cases arise from the leakage of gasoline from a gasoline service station, located at the corner of Jarrettsville Pike and Paper Mill Road in the Jacksonville area of Baltimore County. The station was owned by Exxon-Mobil Corporation, appellant. The leak occurred, on January 13, 2006, whe

ACCEPTED 03-15-00596-CV 8332526 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS