Cases

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

Opinion and Order JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jonathan Waters brings this employment discrimination action against his former employer, defendant The Ohio State University. Waters asserts a claim under Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., alleging that Ohio State discriminated against him by terminating him from his position as Directo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

147 S.W.3d 578 (2004) Nixon FIALLOS, Feradon Amjadi, and Geo Science Engineering & Testing, Inc., Appellants, v. PAGAN-LEWIS MOTORS, INC., Hiram Cox and Cox Car Company (a/k/a Cox Motors), Appellees. No. 13-02-342-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. August 26, 2004. Rehearing Overruled November 4, 2004.

[Cite as Gondor v. State, 2015-Ohio-4022.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO BOB GONDOR, et al., : OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, : CASE NO. 2014-P-0030 - vs - : STATE OF OHIO,

OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff David Van Burén brings this reverse racial discrimination and retaliation case against his employer the Ohio Department of Public Safety and two of its directors. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Discovery Order (ECF No. 56) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57).

Inge, Garry V., J. INTRODUCTION This is a class action involving an alleged failure to train and supervise state correctional employees. At all times relevant to this action, the plaintiffs, John F. Campbell, Michael C. Harju, Marlon Guardado, Ronald G. Paris, Hector M. Rodriguez, Raheem Childers, Franz Harris, Jr., Nevin Dustin Hiram Irizarry Mojica, Myron Vacca, Phillip C. Shannonhouse, and Timothy M. Var

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case addresses a challenge by plaintiffs-appellants to the district court’s dismissal of all claims against defendants-appellees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We agree with the district court that diversity was lacking in this case. We find, however, that the district court had the power, under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims against

877 F.Supp. 896 (1995) Robert M. HAFT, Plaintiff, v. DART GROUP CORPORATION, Crown Books Corporation, and Trak Auto Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-384-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 22, 1995. *897 *898 Lawrence C. Ashby, and John S. Grimm, of Ashby & Gedd

14 F.Supp.2d 956 (1997) The STATE OF TEXAS v. The AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, et al. No. 5-96CV-91. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division. September 8, 1997. *957 *958 *959 John M. O'Quinn, Kendall Charles Montgomery, O'Quinn & Lami

22 F.3d 1559 Jerry PALMER, as surviving spouse of Paulette Palmer,deceased; Jerry Palmer, as administrator and personalrepresentative of the estate of Paulette Palmer, deceased;Jerry Palmer, as the sole surviving parent of Unborn InfantPalmer, deceased; and Jerry Palmer, as the personalrepresentative and next friend of Unborn Infant Palmer,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, a Georgia pub

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2001 ANOUSH CAB, INC.; ARAMS, INC.; ARARRAT, INC.; ATLANTIC CAB, INC.; BARLOW CAB, INC.; BEDROS CAB, INC.; BOYLSTON CAB, INC.; BRIGHAM CAB, INC.; CLEVELAND CAB, INC.; DIAMOND CAB, INC.; ELSIE CAB, INC.; FENWAY TAXI,INC.; G&A CAB, INC.; JORDAN CAB, INC.; JUBRAN CAB, INC.; KILMARNOCK CAB,INC.; LITTLE ISLAND CAB, INC.; LOCUST CAB, INC.; LONGWOOD CAB, INC.; M & AN CAB, INC.; M.P.E. CAB, INC.; MARBED C

Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

"WILSON, Circuit Judge: Automobile body shops filed five complaints, each asserting federal antitrust and state tort claims against insurance companies. The body shops appeal the dismissal of their complaints for failure to state a claim. The automobile insurance and repair industries have customs and practices that the public frequently encounter and endorse. The public’s level of familiarity, however, h

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton

44 F.Supp. 97 (1941) UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. Eq. No. 85-73. District Court, S. D. New York. September 30, October 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1941. *98 *99 *100 *101

673 F.Supp.2d 358 (2009) VARIOUS PLAINTIFFS v. VARIOUS DEFENDANTS ("OIL FIELD CASES"). Civil Action No. 09-MC-103. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 10, 2009. *360 Ryan A. Foster, Houston, TX, pro se. MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. The instant motion to remand