Cases

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JORDAN HINTON (SC 20881) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Dannehy and Bright, Js. Syllabus Convicted of the crime of felony murder and attempt to commit robbery in the first degree, among other crimes, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant’s conviction stemmed from an incident in which another individual, C, shot the murder victim, D, while D and the d

Katz, J. A jury convicted the defendant, Ronnie Hinton, of three counts of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 one count of capital felony in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54b,2 one count of attempted murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-54a,3 and one count of assault in the first degree in violation o

The petitioner Ronnie Hinton’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 549 (AC 15241), is denied.

FREEDMAN, J. The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court. He claims first that the habeas court improperly denied his petition for certification to appeal following the dismissal of his amended petition for a writ of habeas coipus, and he claims second that the habeas court improperly dismissed counts three and four of his amended petition for habeas coipus relief. The facts are not in dispute.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUNDAY HINTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1295 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises out of the District of Columbia’s (the “District”) policy regarding the housing of transgender individuals in the custody of its Dep

Arthur H. Healey, J. The defendant was convicted by a jury on three counts of sexual assault in the first degree, one count of burglary in the first degree, and one count of robbery in the first degree. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion *290to suppress pretrial identifications and in denying his motion for production of “statements” of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant eBay, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [181], Having considered the submissions of the parties and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted. I. BACKGROUND This action centers on the Plaintiff Marsh

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY, TO STRIKE REPLY TO ADDITIONAL STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACT, AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. Concluding that there are genuine issues of material fact that preclude relief on dispositive motions, the Court dismisses the Defendants’ two motions for summary judgment. The Court also dismisses the parties’ motions to exclude the opposing exp

38 Cal.Rptr.3d 149 (2006) 37 Cal.4th 839 126 P.3d 981 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Eric Lamont HINTON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S037302. Supreme Court of California January 26, 2006. *161 Jay L. Lichtman, Los Angeles, and Tracy J. Dressner, La Crescenta, under appoin

11 F.Supp.2d 272 (1998) Charles E. HINTON, Plaintiff, v. Paul MORITZ, Senior Parole Officer; Luminia Pamerleau, Parole Hearing Officer; Richard Mata, Parole Hearing Officer; Brion D. Travis, Chairman of N.Y.S. Parole; Frederick Netzel, Superintendent of E.C.C.F.; George Pataki, Governor of New York State; John Doe # 3, (Mr. Pruitt), Fugitive Officer N.Y.S. Parole; John Doe # 2, (Martinez), Fugitive Officer N.Y.S. Parole; John Doe # 1, (Mecklenbur

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge (dissenting): I dissent. The result of an affirmance of Judge Motley’s apportionment of 33V3 percent blame to Moran and 66% percent blame to the State of Connecticut will be to make it increasingly less expensive and more fun for the careless navigators of the Moran Towing and Transportation Company to crown each succeeding rendezvous with the Tomlinson Bridge with a re

321 S.E.2d 161 (1984) Johnnie HINTON, Jr. v. Margie C. HINTON. No. 8310DC1222. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 16, 1984. DeMent, Askew & Gaskins by Johnny S. Gaskins, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant. Edelstein, Payne & Jordan by Thomas W. Jordan, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellee. BRASWELL, Judge. When plaintiff-husband f

On an indictment charging him with larceny, Joe Hinton *Page 312 was tried, convicted, and sentenced by the court to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary. Robert Hinton, the owner of the money stolen, testified that on the third Sunday in April, 1935, he left three hundred eighty-five dollars in money with his wife, Willie Hinton, and went away to his work, which was some distance from his home, and that at noon of the following da

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–1232 Submitted November 15, 2023—Filed June 28, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KYRA ROSE BAULER, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Plymouth County, Jeffrey A. Neary, Judge. A defendant appeals the denial of her motion to suppress, challenging the stop of her vehicle, the open-air dog sniff performed on her vehicle, and the search of h

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM MIXTON, Appellant. No. CR-19-0276-PR Filed January 11, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Sean E. Brearcliffe, Judge

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM MIXTON, Appellant. No. CR-19-0276-PR Filed January 11, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Sean E. Brearcliffe, Judge

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-99 No. 261A18-3 Filed 19 August 2022 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. TIM MOORE, in his official capacity, and PHILIP BERGER, in his official capacity. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1954 Submitted March 24, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 Amended September 14, 2021 CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA, TERRY BRANSTAD, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, BRENNA FINDLEY, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official Capacity, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper Count

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1954 Submitted March 24, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA, TERRY BRANSTAD, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, BRENNA FINDLEY, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official Capacity, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Brad McCall, Judge. Defendants ap

BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. A Coahoma County jury convicted Herman Jackson of possession of marijuana of more than thirty grams but less than one kilogram with intent to sell, transfer, barter, distribute, or dispense. The trial court sentenced him to ten years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) as a subsequent drug offender