Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Hinton v. Grieco”
Puckett v. Eppspublic domain
615 F.Supp.2d 494 (2009) Larry Matthew PUCKETT, Petitioner v. Christopher B. EPPS, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Lawrence Kelly, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, Respondents. Civil Action No. 2:04CV302HSO. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division. March 30, 2009. *498<
436 F.Supp.2d 873 (2006) In re: THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 5:03 CV 2166, 1:03 CV 2294, 1:03 CV 2344, 5:03 CV 2168, 5:03 CV 2176, 5:03 CV 2188, 5:03 CV 2192, 5:03 CV 2203, 5:03 CV 2210, 5:03 CV 2227, 5:03 CV 2233, 5:03 CV 2285-5:03 CV 2287, 5:03 2297-5:03 CV 2299, 5:03 CV 2443, 5:03 CV 2447, 5:03 CV 2592. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.</
State of Tennessee v. Perry Avram Marchpublic domain
OPINION THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JERRY L. SMITH and ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, JJ., joined. Following a jury trial, Defendant, Perry Avram March, was convicted of second degree murder, a Class A felony, abuse of a corpse, a Class E felony, and d
Mealer v. Jonespublic domain
573 F.Supp. 675 (1983) Thomas MEALER, Petitioner, v. Everett JONES, Respondent. No. 83 Civ. 3469 (KTD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 1, 1983. *676 The Legal Aid Society, New York City, for petitioner; William E. Hellerstein, New York City, of counsel. Robert M. Morgenthau, Dist. Atty., New York Cou
Maine v. Moultonpublic domain
*181Chief Justice Burger, with whom Justice White and Justice Rehnquist join, and with whom Justice O’Con-nor joins as to Parts I and III, dissenting. Today the Court holds that the Sixth Amendment prohibits the use at trial of postindictment statements made to a government informant, even where those statements were recorded as part of a good-faith inves
Commonwealth v. Cohenpublic domain
6 Mass. App. Ct. 653 (1978) 382 N.E.2d 1105 COMMONWEALTH vs. PAUL R. COHEN. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 10, 1978. November 14, 1978. Present: HALE, C.J., ROSE, & ARMSTRONG, JJ. Fern L. Nesson for the defendant. *654 Thomas E. Peisch, Assistant District A
Thomas Mealer v. Everett Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondentpublic domain
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: Thomas Mealer appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District, 573 F.Supp. 675, Duffy, J., denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant petitioned to set aside his 1976 conviction in the Supreme Court, New York County, for second degree murder, on the ground that the
People v. Schwimmerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Richard W. Wallach, J. What are the constitutional limitations of covert police activity when conducted against a charged and arraigned defendant in the absence of his counsel? And which side shall properly bear the burden of proof in justification of such a *981police operation when defendant moves, as here, to suppress the da
United States v. Tony Darwinpublic domain
GODBOLD, Chief Judge: A principal issue in this appeal concerns Massiah. 1 While the defendant was in jail following his arrest on narcotics charges, *1196 the government obtained through a wired i
Hill v. United Statespublic domain
434 A.2d 422 (1981) Clinton HILL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 79-830. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 8, 1981. Decided August 5, 1981. *424 William J. Mertens, Public Defender Service, Washington, D. C., with whom Silas, J. Wasserstrom and Randy I. Bellows, Public Defender Ser
People v. Berlandpublic domain
74 Ill.2d 286 (1978) 385 N.E.2d 649 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. ALBERT BERLAND et al., Appellees. Nos. 50012, 50534 cons. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed December 4, 1978. Supplemental opinion filed on denial of rehearing February 20, 1979. *287
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals arise out of the joint trial of defendants Louis Moschiano and Robert Fred “Pete” Bishop on charges of conspiracy to distribute heroin (Count One) and distribution of heroin (Count Two) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1976). The jury found Moschiano guilty on both counts but found Bishop guilty only on Count One. <