Cases

THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a civil rights action. It is before the Court on the Defendant Felicia Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 48] and the Defendant Newton County School District's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 56]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant Felicia Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 48] is GRANTED and the Defendant Newton County School District's

ORDER PER CURIAM. Cleo Hines (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing because the State used a theory of prosecution to convict him of robbery and murder that was inconsistent with t

GARY W. LYNCH, P.J. Christopher J. Hines (“Defendant”) was found guilty by a jury of the class C felony of child abuse, see section 568.060, and sentenced to a term of fifteen years’ incarceration in the Department of Corrections.1 On appeal, Defendant makes two claims: first, the evidence was insufficient to establish that he inflicted cruel and inhuman punishment and that he did so kno

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward W. Jefferson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Bishop, No.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Durand E. Hines (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following a jury verdict convicting him of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, in violation of Section 577.060 RSMo 1994 and driving with his license revoked, in violation of Section 302.321 RSMo Cum.Supp. 1999. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a term of four years on the leaving-the-see

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge. Robert Hines (“Movant”) appeals a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief from his convictions for two counts of assault in the first degree (§ 565.050) and one count of armed criminal action (§ 571.015).1 The motion court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that denied Movant’s claims without conducting an evidentiary hearing. On app

693 S.E.2d 781 (2010) JEFFERSON ORCHARDS, INC., Petitioner below, Appellant v. JEFFERSON COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, a Public Body; Paul Raco, Zoning Administrator; Thomas Trumble, Member; Edwin T. Kelly, II, Member; Tiffany Hine, Chairperson; Christy Huddle, Member; and Frances Morgan, Member, Respondents below, Appellees. No. 35129. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant pleaded guilty to distributing a controlled substance near a school and possession of a controlled substance on June 4, 1991. The trial court sentenced Defendant on that date. Defendant was delivered to the custody of the Department of Corrections on June 10, 1991. He filed a Rule 24.035 motion on March 9, 1993, which was denied as untimely. On ap

PARRISH, Judge. The Director of Revenue (the director) appeals an order rescinding the suspension of Deana Hines’ driver’s license. The director contends the trial court erred in rescinding the suspension of Mrs. Hines’ license because the evidence disclosed she was operating a vehicle while in an intoxicated condition when the vehicle was stuck in a ditch. The director argues that the fact someone other than Mrs. Hines drove the

ORDER PER CURIAM. Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting *795forth the

950 F.Supp. 175 (1996) Leonard C. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. HINES NURSERIES, INC., Robert A. Ferguson and Ronald P. Ciaccio, Defendants. No. 3:95-CV-3091-T. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. November 26, 1996. *176 David Fielding, Fielding Barrett & Taylor, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff. Rebecca A

Plaintiff Mary J. Hines, who was a housekeeper for defendants Clifford and Maelynn Hardy, slipped on a crosstie on the Hardys' property and fell, injuring herself. She sued the Hardys, alleging negligence and wanton conduct, and the trial court entered summary judgment for the Hardys on both claims. Hines had worked for the Hardys two days a week for the past 14 years, performing such services as cleaning, ironing, tending to the children, and running errands. On the day of her

931 F.Supp. 1315 (1996) Elizabeth DUGAS v. JEFFERSON COUNTY et al. No. 1:95-CV-437. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. June 21, 1996. *1316 Patricia A. Stone, Stone & Stone, Beaumont, TX, Donald E. Sample, Sample and Sample, Beaumont, TX, for Elizabeth Dugas. John G. Bissell, Strong Pipkin Nel

ORDER PER CURIAM: Direct appeal from a jury conviction for kidnapping, in violation of § 565.110 RSMo 1986, robbery, first degree, in violation of § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and stealing a motor vehicle, in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1984. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

*116 MEMORANDUM RE BYSTANDER THEORY OF LIABILITY TO PLAINTIFF JIM RIDEAUX, JR. HINES, United States Magistrate Judge. Invoking the court’s supplemental jurisdiction, plaintiff Jim Rideaux, Jr. seeks recovery from defendant Daniel Troy Smith under a theory of bystander liability. Jim Rideaux, Jr. alleges that he suffered emotional trauma upon

900 F.Supp. 84 (1995) Steven FICKES v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, et al. No. 1:94-CV-137. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. September 13, 1995. *85 Karla JM Rogers, Vidor, TX, Roy Travis McCall, Waldman Smallman Grossman & Carpenter, Beaumont, TX, for plaintiff Steven Fickes. Steven Fickes, Vidor, TX,

911 F.Supp. 251 (1995) Elizabeth DUGAS v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, et al. No. 1:95-CV-437. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. December 15, 1995. *252 *253 Patricia A. Stone, Stone & Stone, Beaumont, TX, Donald E. Sample, Sample and Sample, Beaumont, TX, for plaintiff.

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge. Defendant was convicted in a jury tried case of two counts of assault first degree, § 565.050 RSMo (1978) in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to terms of thirty and fifteen years for counts I and II, the counts to run consecutively. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing a state’s witness to make an in cou

899 F.Supp. 298 (1995) Albertha RIDEAU, et al. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, et al. No. 1:94-CV-439. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 25, 1995. *299 Michael Essmyer, Clay T. Grover, Essmyer & Tritico, Houston, TX, for Albertha Rideau, Kathy Lee Rideau-Smith, Stephfon Lavence, Jim Rideaux, Jr., Claude

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. In this removed diversity action, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the July 23, 2008 amended inter vivos trust (hereinafter the “2008 Amended Trust”1) of her father, Colonel William P. Oliver, is invalid. The parties conducted full discovery. In the course of discovery, a conce