Cases

857 F.Supp. 579 (1994) Barney QUILTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George V. VOINOVICH, et al., Defendants. No. 5:91 CV 2219. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 1994. *580 Timothy F. Scanlon, Scanlon & Gearinger, Akron, OH, Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., Ann Wightman, Faruki, Gilliam & Ireland, Da

Moyer, C.J., concurring. I concur with the per curiam decision and write separately to state my opinion. Having previously expressed my decision with respect to the issues of standing and justiciability of the issues before us, I find no need to restate them here. See 62 Ohio St.3d 1224, 584 N.E.2d 737. The complaint filed by plaintiffs Voinovich, Aronoff and Taft presented a c

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 225.] THE STATE EX REL. OHIO AFL-CIO ET AL. v. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR, ET AL. THE STATE EX REL. GELTZER v. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR, ET AL. THE STATE EX REL. UNITED AUTO AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL WORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Voinovich, 1994-Ohio-1] Constitutional law—General Assembly—Am.Sub.H.B. No. 107—Violation of one-

A. William Sweeney, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. In my view, the 1993 enactment of Am.Sub.H.B. No. 107 clearly violates the one-subject rule of the Ohio Constitution, and the majority seriously errs in arbitrarily upholding portions of that legislation since the General Assembly’s attempt at “logrolling” constituted what was plainly a gross violation of the one-subject r

Appellant John Hill entered a plea of not guilty to charges of aggravated murder and an attendant specification of firearm possession, tampering with evidence, and obstruction of justice.1 Hill withdrew that plea and entered a guilty plea to one count of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of tampering with evidence, and one count of obstructing justice. The trial court accepted the plea and sentenced Hill accordingly in April 1994. Hill failed to f

281 F.Supp.2d 436 (2003) ARBOR HILL CONCERNED CITIZENS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, Albany County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Aaron Mair; Maryam Mair; and Mildred Chang, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF ALBANY and Albany County Board of Elections, Defendants. No. 03-CV-502. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 22, 2003.

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. The question in this bankruptcy appeal is whether a Chapter 7 trustee may bring claims that a Chapter 11 debtor-in-possession could not. We conclude that the trustee is barred in the circumstances of this case from bringing a derivative claim on behalf of a creditors’ committee after conversion to Chapter 7. Accordingly, we AFFI

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Gregory Alan Carroll, of West Union, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039624, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1988. He has engaged in the private practice of law in Adams County since that time, and he served one term as the county’s prosecuting attorney from 1993 until 1997. {¶ 2} On April 19, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint alleging that respondent had

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. T 1 We granted certiorari 1 to consider the lawfulness of Secretary of State Rule 4.1, 8 Colo.Code Regs. § 1505-6:4.1 (2013). Petitioner Colorado Secretary of State Seott Ges-sler ("Gessler") promulgated Rule 4.1 in response to Sampson v. Buescher, 625 F.3d 1247 (10th Cir.2010). Significantly, Rule 4.1 increases the contributio

Coads v Nassau County (2024 NY Slip Op 24314) [*1] Coads v Nassau County 2024 NY Slip Op 24314 Decided on December 6, 2024 Supreme Court, Nassau County Marx, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu

2025 IL 130539 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 130539) PIASA ARMORY, LLC, Appellee, v. KWAME RAOUL, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Appellant. Opinion filed April

Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge *748Overview As the top law enforcement official in the nation, United States Attorney General, Jefferson B. Sessions III, forcefully reminded the country recently, in a different context: "Federal law is the law of the land." Federal law derives in large

Clarke v Town of Newburgh (2025 NY Slip Op 00518) Clarke v Town of Newburgh 2025 NY Slip Op 00518 Decided on January 30, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Lasalle, P.J. Published by New York State

2023 IL 129453 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129453) DAN CAULKINS et al., Appellees, v. JAY ROBERT PRITZKER, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois, et al., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3655 ___________________________ Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians; Spirit Lake Tribe; Wesley Davis; Zachery S. King; Collette Brown Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Michael H

33 The State ex rel. Maurer et al., Appellants, v. Sheward, Judge, Appellee. Wilkinson, Dir., et al., Appellants, v. Maurer et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Maurer v. Sheward (1994), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Constitutional law — Commutations of death sentences by Governor not subject to application process outlined in R.C. 2967.07 — Section 11, Article III, Ohio Constitution, construed. (Nos. 92-1350 and 93-1165

MEMORANDUM OPINION Circuit Judge James A. Wynn, Jr., wrote the opinion, in which District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder and District Judge Catherine C. Eagles joined: Over two years ago, in May 2015, thirty-one registered North Carolina voters (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action alleging that the North Carolina General Assembly unjustifiably, and therefore un

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and writing the majority as to Part VI. I agree with Judge Moore’s opinion as to parts I-V. I write separately with regard to Planned Parenthood’s undue burden claim because, as Judge Dlott’s well-reasoned opinion stated: “Even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to [Planned Parenthood], it is clear that the record does not create a triable issue of m

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-1671 ____________ BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, INC., et al., Petitioners, vs. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Respondents. July 17, 2025 MUÑIZ, C.J. This case involves a challenge t

OPINION AND ORDER PER CURIAM. Following the 2010 decennial census, Michigan enacted a new statewide redistricting plan on August 9, 2011. (S.B. 498, 96 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Mich., 2011) (hereinafter “the Plan”)). Plaintiffs, a coalition of civil rights groups, a union, and several Michigan residents, filed this action against state officials contending that the Plan violates minority voters’ rights protected under A