Cases

218 P.3d 540 (2009) 347 Or. 258 HILL v. HALL. (S057702). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2009. Petition for review denied.

136 P.3d 757 (2006) 206 Or. App. 237 HILL v. HALL. OREGON COURT OF APPEALS. May 31, 2006. Affirmed without opinion.

MlKELL, Judge. Following a bench trial, Thomas Hill appeals from the trial court’s order finding that the Hall County Board of Tax Assessors’ (the “Board”) 2003 appraisal of his lakefront property met the required standards of uniformity and represented the fair market value of Hill’s property. Hill asserts that the Board failed to satisfy its burden to prove that: (1) his 2002 assessment was below market value; or (2) the lan

ORDER RANDA, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel. For the following reasons, plaintiffs request is denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Bernadette Hill (“Hill”), a black female, sought employment from the defendant, Hall Chevrolet, Inc. (“Hall”), as a car salesperson. Hill filled out

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, P. J., BROWN, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT.

OPINION GARBARINO, Judge. ¶ 1 Petitioner Reg Lynn Hill claims that the trial court erred by denying his request for a change of judge pursuant to Rule 17.4(g) of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that an earlier Rule 10.2 change of judge at his request was an exercise of his only peremptory challenge and that he is not entitled to a second peremptory change of judge pursuant to Rule 17.4(g)

213 P.3d 577 (2009) 346 Or. 363 HALL v. HILL. (S057465). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 9, 2009. Petition for review denied.

723 S.E.2d 173 (2012) LAUREL HILL APARTMENTS v. HALL. No. COA11-1169. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed April 3, 2012. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Reversed.

MEMORANDUM ** Roger D. Hall, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his rights by improperly garnishing funds from his prison trust account when he was ordered to pay restitution for property damage after a disciplinary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C.J., BROWN, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules December 9, 2022

36 F.Supp.2d 1185 (1999) Donald H. HALL, etc., Plaintiff, v. HILL REFRIGERATION, INC., et al., Defendant. No. CV 97-0261 MRP. United States District Court, C.D. California. February 19, 1999. *1186 Karl L. Cambronne, Chestnut & Brooks, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff. Stuart H. Young, Jr., Hill, Farrer & Burri

BOLIN, Justice. Chad Jones petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court to vacate its order denying his motion for a summary judgment in an action filed against him by Latonya Hall,, individually and as mother and next friend of Demetrius Hall, a minor, and Maurice Caffie, individually (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Hall”), and to enter a summary judgment in his favor on the ba

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered April 7, 2015, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdr

[Cite as Hill v. Mullins, 2017-Ohio-1302.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY ANNE HILL : : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 27127 : v.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Sciarrino, Jr., J.), imposed April 27, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw,

RULING, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“VRA”) and the VRA amendments of 1982, 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (previously codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1973), the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1986.1 Plaintiff Kenneth Hall an

[Cite as State v. Hill, 2015-Ohio-3916.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 26455 : v.

125 P.3d 284 (2005) 2005 WY 166 Robert Myles HALL, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Nancy Kay HALL, Appellee (Defendant). No. 05-72. Supreme Court of Wyoming. December 30, 2005. *285 Joseph F. Moore, Jr., and Glenn M. Ford of Moore, Myers & Garland, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming, for Appellant. Argument by Mr. Moore.

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 99), filed by Defendants Judge Laura Davis, Judge Suzan Ponder, and Judge Alex Wall (the “Defendant-Judges”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiff Kenneth Hall’s (“Hall”) claims against them, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 Hall op