⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Hill v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.”

District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018-07-16 · Published · cited 3× · 319 F. Supp. 3d 907
GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On April 12, 2017, Plaintiff, Karen Saunders, filed an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) against Defendant, Dyck O'Neal, Inc. The facts arise out of Dyck O'Neal's efforts to collect a mortgage deficiency that Saunders alleges her ex-husband owes. From 2015 through 2017, Dyck O'Neal called repeatedly and left a number of voicemails on Saunders' phone. Dyck O'Neal u
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 369 F. Supp. 3d 1324
CHARLES A. PANNELL, JR., United States District Judge This action was brought by the plaintiff under Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (the "FCRA"). Before the court is the defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC's ("Ocwen") objections [Doc. No. 29] to the February 25, 2019, report and recom
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-07-14 · Published · cited 1× · 222 So. 3d 647; 2017 WL 2988898; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10102
MORRIS, Judge. The appellants—the borrowers and guarantors of a commercial real estate loan—appeal a final judgment entered in favor of the lender, SLVIV Lending, L.P. The trial court concluded that the parties agreed to apply Texas law to the lender’s claim for deficiency and that under Texas law, the appellants waived their right to challenge the amount of the deficiency. We agr
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005-02-15 · Published · cited 3× · 87 Conn. App. 485; 866 A.2d 695; 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 66
Opinion DRANGINIS, J. This appeal is similar to the appeal in America’s Wholesale Lender v. Pagano, 87 Conn. App. 474, 866 A.2d 698 (2005), which we released on the same date as this opinion. The dispositive issue is whether a corporation that brings an action solely in its trade name, without the corporation being named as a party, has standing so as to confer jurisdictio
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015-07-29 · Published · cited 2× · 535 B.R. 415; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99556; 2015 WL 4603410
ORDER BRIAN J. DAVIS, District Judge. This is a Crawford 1-progeny putative class action in which Plaintiff alleges that Defendant is liable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”) for its conduct in Plaintiffs Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. Through this action, Plaintiff admittedly seeks to expand the El
In re Kwiatkowskipublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013-01-25 · Published · cited 7× · 486 B.R. 409; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 560; 2013 WL 309863
OPINION REGARDING CREDITOR SUMMIT GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC’S OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction This case came before the Court for two hearings on confirmation of the Debtor’s proposed Chapter 13 plan (Docket # 12, the “Plan”). The Court then held an evi-dentiary hearing regarding the objection to confirmation of the unsecured creditor Summit Gro
Shahar v. Bowerspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 70 F.3d 1218
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 93-9345. Robin Joy SHAHAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. BOWERS, Individually and in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Georgia, Defendant-Appellee. May 30, 1997. Appeal fro
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-04-08 · Published · cited 40× · 785 F. Supp. 2d 883; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132136; 2011 WL 1485479
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997-05-30 · Published · cited 56× · 114 F.3d 1097; 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1582; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13069; 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,739; 1997 WL 285973
114 F.3d 1097 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,739, 65 USLW2795, 12 IER Cases 1582,11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 36 Robin Joy SHAHAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Michael J. BOWERS, Individually and in his official capacityas Attorney General of the State of Georgia,Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-9345. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.
United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937-12-07 · Published · cited 1× · 36 B.T.A. 977; 1937 BTA LEXIS 628
A. W. MELLON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. 1Mellon v. CommissionerDocket No. 76499.United States Board of Tax Appeals<