Cases

The Reorganized Debtors have argued that it is quite clear that the last iterations of the Sub-Advisory and Shared Services Agreements intended to supersede in every way the prior versions. That includes the provisions directing arbitration. And, they argue, it does not matter when the causes of action occurred/accrued or not. What matters is that the parties agreed at some point that their disputes would not be sent to arbitration

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PATRICK DAUGHERTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0488-SG ) HIGHLAND CAPITAL ) MANAGEMENT, L.P., HIGHLAND ) EMPLOYEE RETENTION ASSETS ) LLC, HIGHLAND ERA ) MANAGEMENT LLC, and JAMES ) DONDERO, )

OPINION ON REHEARING LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. We originally issued our opinion in this appeal on April 5, 2012. Appellee Ryder Scott Company has filed a motion for rehearing. We grant the motion for rehearing, vacate our earlier judgment, withdraw our previous opinion, and issue this opinion in its place. In this securities case, appellants, Highland Capital Management, L.P.; ML C

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KURAMO CAPITAL ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, KURAMO ) AFRICA OPPORTUNITY MASTER ) FUND II, L.P., KURAMO AFRICA ) OPPORTUNITY MASTER CO- ) INVESTMENT VEHICLE III, LP, ) and KURAMO AFRICA ) OPPORTUNITY AGRIBUSINESS ) VEHICLE, LP, ) )

Case: 22-10189 Document: 00516606273 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BANDERA MASTER FUND LP, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0372-JTL ) BOARDWALK PIPELINE PARTNERS, ) LP, et al., )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BANDERA MASTER FUND LP, § BANDERA VALUE FUND LLC, § BANDERA OFFSHORE VALUE § No. 439, 2024 FUND LTD., LEE-WAY § FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., § Court Below: Court of Chancery and JAMES R. MCBRIDE, on behalf § of the State of Delaware of themselves and similarly situated § BOARDWALK PIPELINE § C.A. No. 2018-0372 PARTNERS, LP UNITHOL

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor: I. Introduction An ambitious private equity firm, Edge-water Growth Capital Partners LP (“Edgewater”), invested in several businesses that were involved in providing services to companies operating automated teller machines and put them together in one company called “Pendum.” Edgewater wrote a relatively small equity check and saddled the acquired

454 B.R. 574 (2011) In re MOLL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Debtors. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Moll Industries, Inc., et al., Plaintiff, v. Highland Capital Management L.P., Highland Legacy Ltd., Highland Loan Funding V Ltd., Longhorn Credit Funding LLC, Pam Capital Funding, LP, Pamco Cayman Ltd., Restoration Funding CLO, Ltd., Highland Crusader Offshore Partners, NexBank, SSB, Defendants. Bankruptcy

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 28, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01118-CV LV HIGHLAND CREDIT FEEDER FUND LLC, CHARLES A. WALSH III, THE RUDERMAN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, THE FRIEDMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION, THE LOUIS E. WOLFSON FOUNDATION, BARBARA ROBERTS, AND ABRAM LONDON, Appell

444 B.R. 51 (2010) In re BROADSTRIPE, LLC, et al., Debtors. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Broadstripe, LLC, on behalf of the estate of Broadstripe, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10006 (CSS). Adversary No. 09-50966. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. September 2, 2010.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CALUMET CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC; ) CALUMET LIMITED LLC; and ) CALUMET PRINCIPALS LLC, ) individually and derivatively on behalf of ) CALUMET CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0036-JT

Opinion issued December 6, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-10-00362-CV ——————————— HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., ML CBO IV (CAYMAN) LTD., PAMCO CAYMAN, LTD., PAM CAPITAL FUNDING, L.P., FAMCO VALUE INCOME PARTNERS, L.P., AND FAMCO OFFSHORE, LTD.,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE CVR REFINING, LP ) CONSOLIDATED UNITHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2019-0062-KSJM MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: July 30, 2019 Date Decided: January 31, 2020 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, Christopher P. Quinn, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Lebovitch, Adam Wierzbowski, David Wales, BERN

442 B.R. 537 (2010) In re BIGLER LP; Bigler Land, LLC, Bigler Petrochemical, LP, Bigler Plant Services, LP, Bigler Terminals, LP, Debtors. Nos. 09-38188, 09-38189, 09-38190, 09-38192, 09-38194. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 24, 2010. *539 Aaron James Power, Edward L. Ripley, Henry J. Kaim, Mark W.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN SIMONS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0841-KSJM ) BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT ) INC., BCP IV GRAFTECH HOLDINGS LP, ) BPE IV (NON-CDN) GP LP, B

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATRIX PARENT, INC.; H.I.G. ) MOBILE, L.P.; H.I.G. EUROPE ) MIDDLE MARKET LBO FUND, L.P.; ) C.A. No. N23C-10-212 MAA CCLD H.I.G. MIDDLE MARKET LBO FUND ) III, L.P.; H.I.G. TECHNOLOGY ) PARTNERS A, L.P.; H.I.G. ) TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS B, L.P.; ) AND H.I.G. MATRIX COINVESTORS, ) L.P., ) Plaintiffs, ) )

ACCEPTED 15-25-00221-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/2/2026 4:44 PM NO. 15-25-00221-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Stacey G. C. Jernigan, United States Bankruptcy Judge Joshua N. Terry (the "Petitioning Creditor" or "Mr. Terry") filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions (the "Involuntary Petitions") against each of the two above-referenced related companies (the "Alleged Debtors") on January 30, 2018.1 The Involuntary Petitions were contested, and the court held a multi-day trial (the "Trial") spanning March 21, 22, 23

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, two financial services companies, bring this suit against Twitter Inc. *248for common law fraud.1 They claim that Twitter led them to believe that non-party GSV Asset Management Inc. (“GSV Asset”) was its ag