Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “High Quality Furniture Corp v. Clark”
OPINION AND ORDER AVTLLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge Plaintiff Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. alleges that defendants, vertically-integrated manufacturers of containerboard products, conspired to restrict output and raise prices in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. All but a single defendant move to transfer this case to the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois p
Cockrum v. C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc.public domain
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON MAY 29, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON SARAH R. PENDLETON MAY 29, 2025
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: A jury awarded $1,312,665.35 to Colonial Trading, LLC (“Colonial”) on its breach of contract claim against Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. (“Bassett”) based on a dispute involving recalled baby cribs. The jury also awarded Colonial $41,472.08 on its North Carolina Unfa
626 F.Supp. 667 (1985) PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Plaintiff, v. PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION, Defendant, and PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION and Eli J. Ehrlich, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Counterclaim Defendant, and PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION, Furniture Marketing Specialists, Inc., and Eli J. Ehrlich, C
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed April 28, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00558-CV LITIGATION & RECORDS SERVICES, LLC, Appellant V. QTAT BPO SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee and QTAT BPO SOLUTIONS, INC., Cross-Appellant V. LITIGAT
276 B.R. 507 (2001) In re RIVER OAKS FURNITURE, INC., R.O. East, Inc., Gaines Manufacturing Co., R.O. West, Inc. River Oaks Furniture, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BDO Seidman, BDO Seidman, LLP, Jerome Walsh, Walsh Communications, Inc., Ronald G. Ashby, James B. Cross, Eileen M. McGinley, Leland E. Graul, Jack A. Weisbaum, and Scott M. Univer, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 98-21152 to 98-21155. Adversary No. 98-2172.
Committee for Idaho's High Desert v. Yostpublic domain
881 F.Supp. 1457 (1995) COMMITTEE FOR IDAHO'S HIGH DESERT, Plaintiff, v. James A. YOST, Ted Hoffman and Quey Johns, doing business as "The Committee for Idaho's High Desert, Inc.," Defendants. No. CV 94-0089-S-LMB. United States District Court, D. Idaho. April 6, 1995. *1458 *1459
Clearon Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 16 -110 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : CLEARON CORP., and : OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge
THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether an Arizona high school district is an arm of the state entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 & 12203 et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Camco Mfg., Inc. v. Jones Stephens Corp.public domain
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, Chief District Judge. *520Plaintiff Camco Manufacturing, Inc. ("Camco") claims that Defendants Jones Stephens Corp. ("JSC") and Trek Power Inc. ("Trek Power") copied its yellow and black trade dress for electrical adapters and extension cords. (Doc. 16 ¶ 1.) Camco alleges trade dress infringement under § 43(a) of the Lanham
Clearon Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 15 - 91 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : CLEARON CORP., and OCCIDENTAL : CHEMICAL CORP., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Albrightpublic domain
HARRELL, J. On 17 February 2006, Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”), reported a leak of approximately 26,000 gallons of gasoline from the underground tanks at its fueling station located in Jacksonville, Maryland.1 The seemingly cursed Jacksonville community, the unfortunate site of multiple gasoline leaks over the years, see, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Yarema, 69 Md.App. 124, 516 A.2
Little Cypress-Mauriceville Consolidated Independent School District v. Pal Environmental Safety Corp.public domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00069-CV __________________ LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant V. PAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY CORP., Appellee ___________
Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge This case is about small plastic closures that are used to close bags of pastries, bread, and fruit. Kwik Lok Corporation (“Kwik Lok”), a manufacturer of bag closures, has had a long and successful history in the bag closure industry in the United States. Schutte Bagclosures, Inc. (“Schutte, Inc.”), an American subsidiary of Schutte Bagclosures B.V. (“S
Farah, LLC v. Architura Corp.public domain
OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary Farah, LLC, and Barrington Jewels, Inc., (collectively “Farah”) appeal the trial court’s judgment in its breach of contract action against Architura Corporation (“Ar-chitura”) and Architura’s counterclaim on a mechanic’s lien. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. Issues The restated issues before us
Franklin Corp. v. Tedfordpublic domain
*219 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING RANDOLPH, justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. The motion for rehearing filed by Franklin Corporation is denied. The previous opinions of this Court are withdrawn and these opinions are substituted therefor. ¶ 2. Today we are presented with the latest conflict in the ongoing legal stru
ITT Corp. v. Xylem Group, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on (1) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [78], (2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Michael B. Mazis, Ph.D. [76], (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Damages [70], (4) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Robert A. Hutchins, CPA, as to a Reasonable Roy
AHS Hospital Corp. v. Town of Morristownpublic domain
BIANCO, J.T.C. This constitutes the court’s formal opinion following trial, with regard to the profit test stage of a property tax exemption determination pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6, concerning property owned by plaintiff, AHS Hospital Corp., d/b/a Morristown Memorial Hospital1 (the “Hospital”), located within defendant, Town of Morristown, a Municipal Corporation of the State
892 F.Supp. 413 (1995) L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CANAL DOVER FURNITURE CO., INC. and Charles F. Kuder, individually, Defendants. No. 95-CV-492 (FJS). United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 7, 1995. *414 *415 *416 Heslin & Ro