Cases

Docket No. 105018. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS THE BOARD OF EDUCATION, JOLIET TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 204, Appellee, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION, LINCOLN WAY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 et al. (The Illinois State Board of Education et al., Appellants). Opinion filed October 17, 2008. JUSTICE GARMAN deli

Memorandum Opinion Granting in Part Creditor’s Objection to Debtors’ Homestead Exemption, Granting Judgment to Creditor on its §§ 727(a)(2) and (a)(4)(A) Claims, and Denying Creditor’s Claim under § 727(a)(5) Janice Miller Karlin, United States Chief Bankruptcy Judge The creditor’s claims in this case are not unusual; Creditor Holley Performance Products, Inc. (hereafter “Creditor”) objects to Debtors’ ho

Filed 10/25/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA K.M. et al., D075957 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. Nos. 37-2015-00004806- v. CU-PO-CTL, 37-2015-00031982-CU-

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 15:45:42 2018.01.23 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2018-NMCA-005 Filing Date: August 7, 2017 Docket No. A

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: August 7, 2017 4 NO. 35,286 5 LORI KREUTZER and 6 MARCELLE CARUSO, 7 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8 v. 9 ALDO LEOPOLD HIGH SCHOOL, 10 Defendant-Appellee, 11 and 12 NISHA MILLIGAN, BARBARA JIMENEZ, 13 and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF 14 AMERICA, 15 Defendants. 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRANT COUNTY 17 Jennifer E. Delaney, District Judge 18 Law

DANA L. RASURE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTION .. .800 II. FINDINGS OF FACT.. . 800 A. Background Leading to the Appointment of Trustee.. .801 B. Initial Trustee Period... 804 C. Challenge to the Legitimacy of Trustee... 807 1. Findings Supporting Denial of Motio

OPINION Opinion by Justice Moseley High Mountain Ranch Group, LLP (High Mountain), filed a petition for declaratory judgment against Elbert L. Niece, GT Land LP (GT Land), Mary Hernandez, 1 and the Estate of Manuel Saucedo, Sr. (Saucedo), among others,

Filed 4/26/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TANIMURA & ANTLE FRESH FOODS, H045470 INC., (Monterey County Super. Ct. No. 16CV000616) Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SALINAS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and App

David Nuffer, United States District Judge OVERVIEW This case was tried over 12 days in April and June 2018.1 The United States presented *1121testimony from 25 witnesses, both live and via deposition designation. Defendants rested their case without calling a single witness, but

Filed 6/12/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOLDEN DOOR PROPERTIES, LLC, D075328 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018-0001- 3324-CU-TT-CTL) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

15-25-00136-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00136-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/14/2025 1:41 PM No. _________________

Greenwood, P.J. *779In this appeal we consider whether a school district acted reasonably in imposing school impact fees on a new residential development project intended to house adult seasonal farmworkers employed by the company. The trial court found that there was no reasonable relationship between the fee and the project's impact on school

Opinion DUARTE, J. California has long contemplated a high-speed rail system connecting its southern and northern regions. In 1996 when the Legislature established defendant California High-Speed Rail Authority (the Authority), it declared the need for an intercity rail system operating at high speeds to complement the existing infrastructure of highways and ai

Appellate Case: 25-1335 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 07/17/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 17, 2026

Robb, Judge. Case Summary and Issues [1] In 1961, the City of Hammond created an inspection program for rental housing that permitted inspections of housing and required inspections of rooming houses. In 2001, Hammond created a program which required annual registration of all rental housing and assessed a per unit fee. Beginning in 2011, the Indiana General Assemb

DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Appellee Donna Goetz was terminated from her position as a custodian at the Rock Springs Junior High for stealing or attempting to steal a backpack containing an iPad which belonged to a student. The Board of Trustees of Sweetwater County School District No. 1 upheld the termination, finding that Goetz was provided adequate pretermin-ation process, and that there was cause for termination. On a petitio

JACKSON, Justice. In this appeal we consider whether defendant Cabarrus County (“the County”) had the authority pursuant to its general zoning powers or, in the alternative, a 2004 law enacted by the General Assembly, to adopt an adequate public facilities ordinance (“APFO”) that effectively conditions approval of new residential construction projects on developers paying a fee to subsidize new school construction to prevent

(Chapter 11) Contested Matter (Motion to Approve Settlement Docket Entry 498) MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert G. Mayer, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case is before the court on the Joint Motion and Memorandum for Order Approving Settlement Agreement Between Debtors and First Owners’ Association of Forty-Six Hundred Condominium, Inc., and

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Dr. William W. Gilhaus, Dr. Christy Ziegler, and Lana M. Gerber- filed this action against Defendant- Gardner Edgerton Unified School District No. 231 (USD 231), and Defendants Rob Shippy, Brad Chandler, Teresa Boden, Mary Nelson, and Pam Stranathan, in their individual capacities, based on Plaintiffs’ termination of employment.

2006 WI 95 Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Younkers, Inc., Saks, Inc. and Parisian, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, City of Green Bay and City of Green Bay Redevelopment Authority, Intervenors-Respondents. No. 2005AP323. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Opinion Filed: July 11, 2006. For the plaint