Cases

722 F.Supp.2d 476 (2010) Courtland C. PITTS, Plaintiff, v. Gregory SPENCE, Defendant. C.A. No. 05-185-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 8, 2010. *477 John W. Shaw, Esq., Karen E. Keller, Esq.; James L. Higgins, Esq. of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. Ralph K. Durs

By Judge William H. Ledbetter, Jr. In this divorce case, Mr. Spence has noted fifty-six exceptions to the commissioner’s report, ranging across every disputed issue in this protracted litigation. Background Facts Mr. and Mrs. Spence were married in 1990 in Palisades, New York. Two children were bom of the marriage: Brenna, 8, and Tara, 5. The parties separated on September 1

760 N.W.2d 674 (2008) 280 Mich. App. 213 SHAWL v. SPENCE BROTHERS, INC. Docket No. 275271. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted May 7, 2008, at Lansing. Decided August 19, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. *677 Hurlburt, Tsiros & Allweil, PC, Saginaw (by Lawrence A. Hurlburt), for the plaintiffs.<

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District SHUTTLEWAGON, INC., ) ) Appellant, ) WD83882 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: June 22, 2021 ) SCOTT HIGGINS, ET AL.,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0060p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN M. HIGGINS; CAROL HIGGINS; WEATHERGUARD, ┐ INC., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

*673SHARP, Justice. Plaintiff, Susan Durham Spence, bom 11 June 1935, instituted this action on 24 May 1971 to obtain the custody of her two minor daughters, Fay Frances Spence, born 15 June 1962, and Dianna Jeannene Spence, born 5 June 1964. The defendants are Ronald Kenneth Spence, the children’s father (Spence); James Robert Durham and wife, Faye M. Durham, the paren

OPINION LAYTON, District Judge. This is a purported class action by six1 plaintiffs to have declared unconstitutional certain statutes and Delaware Superior Court rules which permit the entry of judgments by confession upon warrant of attorney. Plaintiffs have also prayed for preliminary and permanent injunctions restraining the Prothonotary and Sheriff from recording or ex

409 S.W.2d 701 (1966) William Blair HUGHES and Mary Elizabeth Mosby, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. George D. SPENCE et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 51583. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. November 14, 1966. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied December 12, 1966. Opinion Modified on Motion December 12, 1966.

164 S.E.2d 593 (1968) 274 N.C. 536 STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph Eugene SPENCE and Glennwood O'Neil Williams. No. 658. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 11, 1968. *594 T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State. George W. Gordon, Greensboro, for defen

James S. Brown, J. This partition action was commenced in 1953. The real property involved consisting of seven or eight adjoining buildings is taxed under one tax lot with a current assessed valuation of $250,000. Plaintiffs own interests totaling 75% and the Niper defendants own 25%. By reason of various deaths and births it became necessary to file and serve, pursuant to orders and without prejudice to pro

306 F.3d 113 Ovalee BAREFOOT; George Wrage; Sharon Allen; Nicholas Fokakis; Algeron Lee Butler, Jr.; Susan Deibert Butler; John Ellis Bryant; Sherry Williams Bryant; Theodore Herring Hewlett, Sr.; Ann Joyce Hewlett; William Addison Hurst; Lillian Williamson Hurst; Miles Creamer Higgins; Margaret Glendy Williard Higgins; Miles Creamer Higgins, III; Colleen Mithcel Higgins; Janet Moore Hicks; John Russell Hicks; Carolyn Timms Hicks; Albert Emerson Wi

422 N.W.2d 277 (1988) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Michael HIGGINS, Appellant. No. C1-87-1424. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 12, 1988. *278 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Linda K. Jenny, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent. Andrew S. Birrell, Mesh

935 F.Supp. 1419 (1996) MILWAUKEE BRANCH OF the N.A.A.C.P.; Felmers Chaney; Vincent Knox and Barbara White, Plaintiffs, Ramon Arellano Valdez and The Federation for Civic Action, Inc., Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Governor Tommy THOMPSON; Senate President Brian D. Rude; Senate Majority Leader Michael G. Ellis; Senate Minority Leader Robert Jauch; Assembly Speaker Walter J. Kunicki; Assembly Majority Leader David M. Travis; Assembly Minority Lea

CHASE, Circuit Judge (dissenting). As Sec. 202(a) of the Revenue Act of 1935, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 811 (j), but gave to executors an option, it is plain enough that Congress might impose such conditions upon its exercise as it saw fit; But if Congress did intend to do what Art. 11 of T.R. 80 provides, and the majority has held the statute means, it chose a strange way to do it. Had that

350 N.W.2d 187 (1984) Barbara L. HIGGINS, Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF JOB SERVICE and United Parcel Service, Appellees. No. 83-849. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 13, 1984. *188 Robert C. Oberbillig, Des Moines, for appellant. Blair H. Dewey, Walter F. Maley, and Edmund Schlak, Jr., Des Moines, for appellees. Cons

28 Cal.App.2d 723 (1938) LELAND HIGGINS et al., Appellants, v. FRANK D. MONCKTON et al., Respondents, Civ. No. 10829. California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division Two. October 20, 1938. Carroll Single and Stanley J. Cook for Appellants. Courtney L. Moore, Morgan C. Lombardi, Keyes & Erskine, Charles K. Harper, Tinning & DeLap,

STURTEVANT, J. On November 26, 1937, Charles E. Higgins, while employed by and in the course of his employment by one of plaintiffs, the Consolidated Rock Products Co., a corporation, was injured. At that time the other *780plaintiff, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, was the employer’s insurance carrier. As a result of said injury said Charles E. Higgins died on the

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring. The plaintiff purchased the premises at a sale upon a decree rendered in a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed on the 21st of February, 1856. The defendant claims under a purchase at a sale made upon a decree rendered in a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien which attached on the 18th of January, 1856. The property was not red

308 F.Supp.2d 43 (2004) Tammy PASSA; Walter Castle, Jr.; Cheryl Rossi, as next of kin of decedent, Joseph E. Rossi, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN; Michael Derderian; Derco, d/b/a "The Station"; Manic Music Management, Inc.; Jack Russell; Mark Kendall; David Filice; Eric Powers; Daniel Bichele; Paul Woolnough; Knight Records, Inc.; Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; McLaughin & Moran, Inc.; American Foam Corporation; WHJY-FM; Clear Channel Com

OPINION BY JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN **26 In this medical malpractice appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred when it refused to qualify plaintiff's only proposed expert witness, citing Code § 8.01-581.20, and granted summary judgment for the defendants. BACKG