Cases

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

914 F.2d 1498 Farmer (J.D., Jr.)v.Higgins (Stephen E.) NO. 90-8185 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. AUG 30, 1990 N.D.Ga., 907 F.2d 1041 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

ALARCON, Circuit Judge. Vincent M. Higgins appeals from the dismissal of his federal civil rights claim that Howard L. Beyer, the Assistant Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections, and 13 employees of the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center (“ADTC employees”) violated 38 U.S.C. § 5301(a) by seizing money derived from a veteran’s disability benefits check from

PER CURIAM. Carl P. Higgins, Appellant, filed a motion for postconviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and raised numerous claims. The trial court denied relief as to all the claims without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching those portions of the record refuting the Appellant’s claims. We find that claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 are legally sufficient. Consequently, we reverse the trial cour

PER CURIAM. We find that appellant’s allegations in his motion for post-conviction relief are sufficient to support his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to advise appellant of the defense of voluntary intoxication. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying that motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the merits of appellant’s claim. POLEN, FARMER and KLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 47 Bruce Higgins, Rebekka Higgins, Estate of Judy Devney, dec’d, and John L. Devney, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Maynard Lund, Kjersti Eide, Don Eide, and Jennifer Eide, Defendants and Appellants and XTO Energy, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., and Whiting Petroleum, Corp., Defendants and Appelle

PER CURIAM. ■ Affirmed, without prejudice to Higgins filing a proper 3.850 motion that conforms with rule 3.987. Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), rev. denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996). STONE, C.J., WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Turner v Higgins (2020 NY Slip Op 04125) Turner v Higgins 2020 NY Slip Op 04125 Decided on July 17, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

259 P.3d 256 (2011) In the Matter of the Marriage of Daniel J. FARMER, Petitioner v. Teresa W. FARMER, Respondent. No. 83960-3. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 11, 2011. Decided September 8, 2011. *259 Catherine Wright Smith, Valerie A. Villacin, Smith Goodfriend PS, Seattle, WA, Douglas Alle

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case of first impression, we are asked to determine whether the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986, prohibits private persons from possessing machine guns. We hold that the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act does prohibit the private possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed prior to May 19,

Turner v Higgins (2020 NY Slip Op 00938) Turner v Higgins 2020 NY Slip Op 00938 Decided on February 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 47 Bruce Higgins, Rebekka Higgins, Estate of Judy Devney, dec’d, and John L. Devney, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Maynard Lund, Kjersti Eide, Don Eide, and Jennifer Eide, Defendants and Appellants and XTO Energy, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., and Whiting Petroleum, Corp., Defendants and Appelle

ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellee Isaac Edward Allen filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit while in prison at the Central Missouri Correctional Center (CMCC). In his pro se complaint, Allen stated that twenty-one separate constitutional violations concerning his treatment and conditions of confinement were committed by ten separate defendants between December 1983 and January 1984. When the matter was submitted to the jury,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2582 ___________________________ Carlos Hall, Sr. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Eric Higgins Def

Petition by defendant (Charles B. Higgins, Sr.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.

Fearing, J. ¶1 Target National Bank sued Jeanette Higgins for defaulting on a credit card debt. The trial court granted Higgins’ motion for summary judgment. As the prevailing party, Higgins requested $11,076 in reasonable *169attorney fees and costs under both RCW 4.84.250 and RCW 4.84.330, respectively labeled the “small claims settlement statute” and the “reciprocal at

239 S.W.3d 752 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Keith Lemont FARMER. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. December 12, 2006 Session. March 28, 2007. *753 T.J. Jones, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Keith Lemont Farmer. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Blind Akrawi, Assistant Attor

OPINION STOWERS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A debtor was given proper initial notice of a pending nonjudicial foreclosure sale but was not given additional notice when the sale was postponed. The debtor argued that equity required re-notice after each postponement and that the lack of re-notice violated his due process rights. The superio

901 A.2d 122 (2005) Anthony P. HIGGINS and Carol Higgins, Plaintiffs, v. Benjamin F. WALLS, III, David W. Tyre, James H. Tyre, Jr., Martin E. Taylor, Sydney McBroom, Sean Messick, Elsie Mitchell, Melvin L. Joseph, Trustee of Trust U/A December 16, 1992, Messick Supply, L.L.C. and George W. Marvel, Sr., Defendants. C.A. No. 03C-10-175-JRS. Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County.