Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 3, 2012, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendants Redwood County, Lon Walling (‘Walling”), Patrick R. Rohland (“Rohland”) and Steven Collins’ (“Collins”) (Redwood County, Walling, Rohland, and Collins are collectively the “Redwood County Defendants”) Joint and In

560 S.E.2d 557 (2002) Richard GILES and wife, Joann Giles, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. FIRST VIRGINIA CREDIT SERVICES, INC., and Professional Auto Recovery, Inc., Defendant-Appellees. No. COA00-1252. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 5, 2002. *559 Sigmon, Clark, Mackie, Hutton, Hanvey & Ferrell, P.A., by E. Fielding Clar

KAPLAN, District Judge: Jacqueline Lewis, an African-American police detective in Union City, Georgia, was terminated abruptly from her position after about ten years of service. The ostensible *1173reason was that Ms. Lewis was absent without leave-this notwithstanding that the Union City Police Department ("UCPD") only days earlier had pl

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The adversary proceeding pending before this Court was filed due to an unscrupulous attorney's theft of $2.4 million. This attorney has no moral compass whatsoever, and his perfidy has resulted in litigation among his former clients, friends, and various third parties who did not have the displeasure of knowing him. While he deservedly spen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. *286BACKGROUND 287 I. PURCHASE OF THE ADT SECURITY SYSTEM........................287 II. AGREEMENT BETWEEN LEE AND ADT.............................290 III. ALLEGED SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURE ............................291

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A, Lindsay, United States District Judge The court makes the following findings of. fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following a bench trial on the following claims by Plaintiff Balfour Beatty Rail Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “BBRI”) and Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“Defendant” or “KCSR”) that remain

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WARE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case raises three vital interests: (1) the national interest in a judicial system to reach informed decisions through the power of a subpoena to compel a third party to produce relevant information; (2) the third-party’s interest in not being compe

488 F.Supp.2d 1157 (2007) Gloria HUNTER and Jessica Hunter, Plaintiffs, v. THE BUCKLE, INC. et al., Defendants. No. 06-2056-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 29, 2007. *1158 *1159 *1160 James D. Bowers, Keith S. Rhodes, Taylor Fields, Fields

(2008) ABN AMRO, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Eirles Four Limited, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Sarco Holdings, and Dhananjay (Dan) Hajela, Defendants. Case No. 04-CV-3123. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 16, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Ju

*434 OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Chief Judge. This multi-district litigation docket involving the classification of FedEx Ground pickup and delivery drivers is before the court on the motions for class certifications filed by plaintiffs in the actions categorized in this docket as “Wave 1,” Wave 2,” and “Wave 3.”

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: The trustees of six multi-employer fringe benefit funds sued John Kny Painting & Decorating, Inc. (Kny. Painting), Fine Finishes & Restoration, Inc. (Fine Finishes), and John H. Kny, alleging that they violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Plaintiffs alleged that Kny closed Kny Painting and opened Fine

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

979 F.Supp. 185 (1997) Bari-Ellen ROBERTS, Sil Chambers, Janet Leigh Williams, Marsha Harris, Beatrice Hester and Veronica Shinault, Plaintiffs, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant. No. 94 CIV.2015(CLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 11, 1997. *186 *187 Daniel Berger, Bernstein

51 S.W.3d 643 (2001) Hipolito Ramos SANCHEZ and Alma Laura Galvan De Ramos, Both Individually and on Behalf of the ESTATE OF Hermes Hipolito Ramos GALVAN, Deceased, Appellants, v. BROWNSVILLE SPORTS CENTER, INC., Leon James, Honda Motor Co., Ltd, Honda R & D Co., Ltd, Honda R & D North America, Inc., Honda North America, Inc., and American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Appellees. No. 13-97-436-CV. Cou

Kato, C.J. Level 3 Communications, L.L.C., (Level 3) appeals summary judgment orders concluding it trespassed by installing underground telecommunications lines in a railroad right-of-way that crosses property owned by Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. (Kershaw). It contends the railroad that approved the installation owned the right-of-way in fee simple; alternatively, it contends the lines are an incidental use of the right-of-wa

91 P.3d 104 (2004) 121 Wash.App. 714 KERSHAW SUNNYSIDE RANCHES, INC., a Washington Corporation, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. YAKIMA INTERURBAN LINES ASSOCIATION, a Washington Nonprofit Corporation, BNSF Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, The State of Washington, Defendants, Level 3 Communications, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Appellant, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Compan

OPINION MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: On July 15, 1983, the United States Department of the Army, acting through the Watervliet Arsenal, in Watervliet, New York, issued the first step in a two-step bidding process for the construction of a chrome-plating facility for the inner surfaces of 120-millimeter M256 cannon barrels mounted on the M1A1 tank. Only plaintiff, Sterling Millwrights, Inc. (Sterling), and a

*435 OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Chief Judge. This multi-district litigation docket involving the classification of FedEx Ground pickup and delivery drivers is before the court on the motions for class certifications filed by plaintiffs in the actions categorized in this docket as “Wave 1,” ‘Wave 2,” and “Wave 3.”

799 F.Supp. 695 (1992) MICHIGAN PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Peggy BABIN, et al., Defendants. No. 90-70181. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. July 22, 1992. *696 *697 *698 *699</