Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-CA-00233-SCT CONSTRILLA WASHINGTON WILSON v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION AND AMERICAN LENDERS SERVICE COMPANY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CLAIBORNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:

883 So.2d 56 (2004) Constrilla Washington WILSON v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION and American Lenders Service Company of Jackson, Mississippi, Inc. No. 2003-CA-00233-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 29, 2004. Rehearing Denied October 21, 2004. *59 Gerald Patrick Collier, attorney for appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-01361-SCT GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. MENOLA BAYMON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/01/97 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH HUMPHREYS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPEALED: ATTORNEYS FOR ANDREW L. FREY APPELLANT: EVAN M. TAGER MIRIAM R. NEMETZ

732 So.2d 262 (1999) GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Menola BAYMON. No. 97-CA-01361-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. February 18, 1999. *264 Andrew L. Frey, Evan M. Tager, Miriam R. Nemetz, Jess H. Dickinson, Biloxi, Attorneys for Appellant. Don Barrett, Brian Herrington, Lexington, John T. Murray, Sylvai M. Ant

USCA11 Case: 18-13894 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 of 142 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13894 ____________________ RAY CHARLES SCHULTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, BRADLEY HESTER,

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Roger Howell, appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs former employer, General Motors Corporation (GM), and his union, the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 969 (UAW Local 969). Plaintiffs hybrid § 301/fair representation claims alleged breach of contract by GM, see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and breach of the duty o

NO. COA14-233 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 6 January 2015 JOANN HESTER, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leland Hester, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bladen County No. 12 CVS 402 HUBERT VESTER FORD, INC., and LARRY McPHAIL, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal by Plaintiff from

141 Ga. App. 28 (1977) 232 S.E.2d 375 GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION v. HESTER. 53205. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted January 6, 1977. Decided January 13, 1977. Lewis N. Jones, John A. Clark, for appellant. Holcomb & McDuff, Terry E. Willis, for appellee. WEBB, Judge. On October 1,

Action to recover two automobiles and two cashier's checks, all of which were in the possession of defendant, D. F. Mayberry, receiver, at the date of the commencement of this action. Prior to the appointment of the said D. F. Mayberry as receiver of the Turner Motor Company, the said automobiles were in the possession of said company. They had been delivered to said company by the plaintiff, under and pursuant to the terms of a contract between the plaintiff and said company. T

984 So.2d 1207 (2007) SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., and Leak Memory Chapel v. Charles Frank HESTER. 2060260. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. November 30, 2007. *1208 Patricia K. Rea of Fann & Rea, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants. William K. Abell of Shinbaum, Abell, McLeod & Campbell, P.C., Montgomery, fo

838 F.Supp. 1479 (1993) James A. BERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 88-2570-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 30, 1993. *1480 *1481 *1482 Dennis E. Egan, The Popham Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, Christ

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND HER LEAD ATTORNEY AND REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON AMOUNT OF SANCTIONS BARTLETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Melody Perkins brought the underlying Title VII claim against General Motors Corporation (G.M.) alleging that she was the victim of both a sexually hostile work environment and qu

MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff below Melody Perkins and her attorney Gwen G. Caranchini appeal an order of the district court 1 refusing to vacate sanctions. Appellants also seek mandamus relief ordering the district court to lift the sanctions. Appellants argue the sanctions must be lifted because the underlying acti

709 F.Supp. 1487 (1989) Melody PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 87-0048-CV-W-9. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. April 10, 1989. *1488 Carroll E. McCue, Gwen G. Caranchini, the Law Offices of Gwen G. Caranchini, Kansas City, Mo., and Linda Skinner, Overland Park, Kan., C. John For

KAROHL, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from a jury verdict in an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Following judgment based on a jury award of actual and punitive damages in favor of plaintiff, Jerry Turner, Sr., defendant General Motors appealed. To have the right to maintain an action, plaintiff must be shown to have a justiciable interest in the subject matter of the action.

I agree with the majority's decision to reverse the circuit court's entry of a j.n.o.v. in favor of Bandy and grant a new trial, but disagree with its relegation of the issue of punitive damages to a mere footnote on the last page of the opinion. In light of our decision in Ivy v. General Motors AcceptanceCorp., 612 So.2d 1108, 1111-12 (Miss. 1992), the $83,920.00 judgment against Evans and Bandy should be reinstated. The majority p

349 Pa. Superior Ct. 147 (1986) 502 A.2d 1317 Josephine JOHNSON, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 11, 1985. Filed January 3, 1986. *149 Laurence S. Berman, Philadelphia, for appellant. Francis P. Burns, III, Philadelphia, for appellee.

By Judge Herbert C. Gill, Jr. The parties, by counsel, appeared before the Court on November 19, 2001, on the matter of four motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of the plaintiff, defendant Continental Casualty Company, defendant Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company, and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. All parties were in agreement thatthere are no facts in dispute. Upon the completion of

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 750 William Brant, Mercantile National Bank of Indiana and Plum Creek Village Associates appeal a summary judgment and award of damages in favor of Hal Hester, Maurice Checroun, Rudy Kutansky and Donald Stratton ("Buyers"). Three issues are presented for our review: I. Did the trial court err

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-67L (Filed: March 27, 2020) ************************************* * UNITED AFFILIATES CORPORATION * AND MINGO LOGAN COAL LLC, * * Motion to Compel; Fifth Amendment Plaintiffs, * Takings Claim; Protective Order;