Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHEKETA MCKNIGHT-NERO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-1541 (APM)

Opinion MILLER, J. Defendant and appellant Town of Apple Valley (Town) and real party in interest and appellant Wal-mart Stores, Inc. (Walmart), appeal the grant of the motion for summary judgment and/or adjudication (Motion) in favor of plaintiff and respondent Gabriel Hernandez. This case involves a measure (Initiative) passed by the Town’s electorate on Nov

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL GRIECO, Appellant, v. DAIHO SANGYO, INC., AW DISTRIBUTING, INC., and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Appellees. Nos. 4D20-2294 and 4D20-2557 [June 15, 2022] Consolidated appeals from the Circu

Appellate Case: 24-2055 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 07/13/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 13, 2026

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated July 8, 2013, as granted that branch of the defendants/third-party *1096 plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. <

GRASZ, Circuit Judge. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") cited Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., doing business as WalMart Distribution Center #7035 ("Wal-Mart"), for two purported violations of OSHA's regulation relating to bloodborne pathogens, 29 C.F.R. § 19

KAREN R. BAKER, Judge, dissenting. The majority affirms this case reasoning that the analysis involves the competing opinions of two doctors. Characterizing the opinions as merely conflicting medical evidence, the májority further concludes that the resolution of the conflict was a question for the Commission leaving this court powerless to reverse the decision

Case: 22-1872 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. SAMAH BENSALEM, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1872 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent

Case: 22-1872 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. SAMAH BENSALEM, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1872 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00125-CV PAY AND SAVE, INC., Appellant v. Roel CANALES,

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Appellant Alasko Foods, Inc. (“Alasko”) and appellee Foodmark, Inc. (“Foodmark”) wage a pitched battle over the meaning of certain provisions in their “U.S. Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement,” which governed their nearly five-year relationship. The district court found that, in accordance with its contractual obligations, Alasko owed

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHELSEA HAMILTON; ALYSSA No. 19-56161 HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. Nos. situated, 5:17-cv-01415- Plaintiffs-Appellants, AB-KK 5:17-cv-01485- v. AB-KK WAL-MART STORES, INC., a corporation; WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MARTIN RODRIGUEZ, § No. 08-17-00113-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 83rd District Court CEMEX, INC.,

Filed 2/23/24 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166401 v. ALAMEDA COUNTY TAXPAYERS’ (Alameda County ASSOCIATION, INC. et al., Super. Ct. No. RG20070099) Defendants and Appellants. ALAMEDA COUNT

Filed 1/29/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166401 v. ALAMEDA COUNTY TAXPAYERS’ (Alameda County ASSOCIATION, INC. et al., Super. Ct. No. RG20070099) Defendants and Appellants. ALAMEDA COUNTY TAXPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. et al.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARLI BROWN; LACEY SMITH, No. 24-3789 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:22-cv-00668- BJR v. OPINION ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.; ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWA AFL-CIO,

James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32) and Plaintiff Carol M. Whitmire's ("Plaintiff") Rule 56(d) Application (Doc. 35 at 11-13). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Application is denied, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

OPINION John Michael Vazguez, United States District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) filed by Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. (“LG”). D.E. ,37. Plaintiff William Eberhart opposed the motion (D.E. 47) and LG filed a reply (D.E, 50). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part

811 F.Supp.2d 766 (2011) PARK B. SMITH, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHF INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant. No. 06 Civ. 869(LMM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 12, 2011. *769 Peter J. Phillips, Lucas & Mercanti, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. James P. Calve, Stephen L. Sulzer, Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, United States District Judge The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this matter has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that Shwarz-Pharmá, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgme