Cases

LOGUE, J. Yuri Sucart and Jose Gustavo Gomez seek writs of certiorari to prevent the plaintiff in the lawsuit below from taking their depositions. They contend that federal law preempts the lawsuit, and therefore the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to issue the subpoenas. Because the record before us does not clearly establish that the lawsuit is preempted, Sucart and Gomez have failed to meet the high standa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AARON SENNE; MICHAEL LIBERTO; Nos. 17-16245 OLIVER ODLE; BRAD MCATEE; CRAIG 17-16267 BENNIGSON; MATT LAWSON; KYLE 17-16276 WOODRUFF; RYAN KIEL; KYLE NICHOLSON; BRAD STONE; MATT D.C. No. DALY; AARON MEADE; JUSTIN 3:14-cv-00608- MURRAY; JAKE KAHAULELIO; RYAN JCS KHOURY; DUSTIN PEASE; JEFF NADEAU; JON G

ORDER RE: 1) MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; 2) MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT COLLECTIVE ACTION; AND 3) MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT DECLARATION AND TESTIMONY JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiffs are minor league baseball players who assert *530

HARPER, J. The petitioner, Charles Marshall, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court erroneously determined that his trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by (1) having an actual conflict of interest as a result of his prior representation of a witness in an unr

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1589 CANGREJEROS DE SANTURCE BASEBALL CLUB, LLC; SANTURCE MERCHANDISING LLC; THOMAS J. AXON, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. LIGA DE BÉISBOL PROFESIONAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC.; CRIOLLOS MANAGEMENT, INC.; RA12, INC.; INDIOS DE MAYAGÜEZ BASEBALL CLUB INC.; GIGANTES DE CAROLINA BASEBALL CLUB INC.; LEONES DE PONCE CF INC.; J

ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I

PRECEDENTIAL AMENDED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGU

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE

VANASKIE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with my colleagues that the Leagues have standing to challenge New Jersey’s Sports Wagering Law, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 5:12A-2, and that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PAS-PA”), 28 U.S.C. :§ 3702, does not violate the principle of “equal sovereignty.” I therefore join parts III and IV.C

ACCEPTED 13-15-00312-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/19/2015 6:10:46 PM

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 18-3550 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, an unincorporated association doing business as MAJO

MEMORANDUM ORDER DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2015, after Plaintiff Robert Swope, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss was submitted on behalf of Defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff was given until January 14, 2015, to file written objecti

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE

680 F.Supp.2d 716 (2010) Robert ACEVEDO, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1044. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 21, 2010. *720 Jeffrey Campolongo, Law Office of Jeffrey Campolongo, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Anne Barden, Jeffrey B. First, City of Philadel

SILER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee Yonatta Crispin-Taveras (“Crispin”) brought a civil rights action against Defendants-Appellants Municipality of Carolina (the “Municipality”) and various Municipality police officers. The district court defaulted the defendants for discovery violations. After a jury trial on damages, the district court entered a judgment in favor of Crispin

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, District Judge. On June 25, 2008, plaintiff Pilar Romero commenced this action as the biological mother and legal guardian of her then-minor daughter Jane Doe (together with Pilar Romero, “plaintiffs”) against defendants the City of New York (the “City”); the New York City Department of Education (“the NYCDOE”); the Special Commissioner of Investigation for

ACCEPTED 15-25-00142-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 15-25-00142-CV 9/29/2025 12:00 AM

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiffs, Kathie Sinisgallo (“Sinisgallo”) and Steve Tsilimparis (“Tsilimparis”) bring this action against the Defendants Town of Islip Housing Authority (“IHA”), Richard Wankel, and Paul E. Levitt, alleging that the Defendants terminated their tenancy in public housing in violation of their constitutional due process rights; United States Housing

406 F.Supp.2d 92 (2005) Timothy SULLIVAN et al. Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AUGUSTA, Defendant. No. CV-04-32-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 22, 2005. *93 *94 *95 Lynne A. Williams, Law Office of Lynne A. Williams, Glen Cove, ME, Zachary L.

OPINION FEATHERSTON, Judge-. These consolidated cases were assigned to Special Trial Judge Helen A. Buckley pursuant to the provisions of section 7456(d) (redesignated sec. 7443A(b) by sec. 1556 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2755) and Rules 180 and 181.1 The Court agrees with and adopts her opinion which is set forth b